TKC EXCLUSIVE!!! A Talk with P&L District Chief Operating Officer Kevin Battle!!!



I knew that Chief Operating Officer of the P&L District Kevin Battle was serious about improving the image of P&L District when he sought me out and worked with me to set up an interview to discuss all things Cordish and Kansas City.

Walking into the posh offices atop Town Pavilion it was clear to me that this is where more important people than TKC make decisions which impact folks on the streets below.

The most important thing that came out of this meeting for TKC readers is greater access to workers within the P&L District to fact check posts. Mr. Battle agreed that the upcoming NAACP meeting and protests efforts that are underway represent some unique challenges and opportunities for the District. On the topic of ongoing discrimination complaints made in the context of planned protests, Mr. Battle called the accusations "baseless."

Most importantly, Mr. Battle didn't back down from previous statements that he plans for the P&L District to extend its help to the NAACP as a major "supporter and host" to the upcoming National Convention. In fact, Mr. Battle confirmed that he had purchased an entire table (a pricey prospect) at a recent NAACP event and has further and developing sponsorship opportunities in mind. However, to put the move in perspective Mr. Battle reminded me that the P&L District makes the same kind of outreach efforts to a great many of Kansas City's diverse communities. Considering that the upcoming NAACP convention is going to be right next door at The Sprint Center, it simply doesn't make sense to think that the P&L District wouldn't take some sponsorship role . . . Local NAACP President Anita Russell can gripe all she wants about my wording but I've fact checked this sponsorship question twice now . . . And that's twice the work I put into most of the posts on this blog. Simply opening up her books and the books of National and other local NAACP orgs would be a lot more convincing than her rhetoric on the matter.

Mr. Battle and I simply disagreed on a recent lawsuit of the Missouri Human Rights Commission. The Chief Operating Officer didn't seem to get the seriousness of the move and explained it as a matter of a dispute over the "process" of complaints whereas I think that any attack from a party place against an organization facilitating Human Rights is unacceptable.

During the conversation it was clear that Mr. Battle was a rather brilliant guy who has an impressive command of the issues facing the P&L District. He touted the upcoming P&L Garment District and a few new stores in order to speak to concerns about local participation.

On the question of this year's $12 million subsidy from Kansas City, Missouri Taxpayers Mr. Battle was quick to remind me that a great deal of the initial $300 million deal to establish the District went to infrastructure improvements that not only benefit the P&L District but also downtown KC. Despite my nitpicking about nearby restaurant closings, undue influence over the affairs of local politicos, government subsidized entertainment and lingering doubts about any real progress to change public perception regarding dress code discrimination . . . Mr. Battle remained steadfast in his opinion that the P&L District was a boon for The Downtown area along with a top advocate for all things inside the loop. Mr. Battle blamed a great deal of any financial hardships on the recession but pointed toward progress to archive profits while viewing the KC subsidy as an overall investment in Downtown.

We ended the conversation with talk about the future for the P&L District. I've always been of the opinion that all entertainment venues have a short lifespan and the fickle party-going crowd isn't dependable for consistent revenues. Mr. Battle quickly offered a catchphrase that he has obviously put a lot of thought into . . . He spoke of his long term goal of making the P&L District "not just a destination but a tradition." It sounded like the perfect PR pitch but I was actually impressed that Mr. Battle has given that much thought to the long term destiny of the P&L District.

All things considered, it was a productive meeting if only to get a quick glimpse of the folks on the other side of one of the most controversial entertainment venues in all of Kansas City. I expect to write more things bashing the P&L District in the future but I'm also glad to have another source for fact checking . . . This year may prove crucial for Kansas City's priciest party investment and we'll see if they will be able to successfully deal with ongoing concerns under what could be a national spotlight.

Developing . . .

Comments

  1. Nice write up T.

    ReplyDelete
  2. actually one of your better posts, tony.

    this is the result you get when you don't rely on "tipsters", etc. and go get the story yourself.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Agreed, 8:51.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Fact-checking? On this blog?

    ReplyDelete
  5. You're becoming "establishment" and a real-time reporter now. Watch-out other bloggers will start calling you the Blog-of-record.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I thought maybe you had a guest author, since this post had actual facts, covered both sides and didn't just go for shock value - nice job Tony!

    ReplyDelete
  7. you should feel proud of the accolades for believeing what cordish's house negro layed on you. Puuuhleeez!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Dear Mr. Battle,

    A sniper loose in the Power and Light District would probably give you better PR than Tony's Kansas City.

    In your future efforts to try and generate some good spin for the district, you should probably try and stay away from Tony, whose reputation for hype, inaccuracy, making things up, reporting unfounded rumors and not missing every opportunity to slam the P&L at every turn precedes him.

    See that link I posted? It's totally made up. In fact, if Tony can't produce a picture of you and him and provide some concrete evidence that this interview actually took place, this whole interview is probably fiction as well since there are no direct quotes from you, Mr. Battle.

    So in short, Mr. Battle, if you did indeed invite Tony into your office, you would be better served by not doing so in the future.

    If you were not, and this whole "interview" is a falsehood as I believe it is, I apologize. Because I frankly think you're smarter than using a thoroughly discredited blogger as an outlet.

    Veritas

    ReplyDelete
  9. Ouch Your Hurt Pussy1/27/10, 2:42 PM

    Veritas is a Kansas City Star reporter looking for a job. And I've seen this same guy posting this same comment for almost half a year that I've been reading TKC.

    Nice post Tony. You're blog is getting really fucking good.

    ReplyDelete
  10. well, ouch, right or wrong, veritas' observations and questions raise valid points.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I am not Tony's mom1/27/10, 3:25 PM

    Not really. It was an okay write up and a sign that Cordish knows exactly who is talking shit about them. Other than than it looks to me like a Star reporter spent at least 10 minutes thinking about Tony when they should be chasing a story.

    ReplyDelete
  12. What kind of arrogant prick would call themselves "Veritas"

    The post was okay but needs more titties. And I think Tony realizes he gets more mileage out of his haters than people who like me who enjoy his blog.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Did Kevin have you sit in that chair with the sawed off legs.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Bwahahaahahahaha. Nice to see that Tony is getting some charity from the P&L.

    ReplyDelete
  15. The dress code issue is done.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Finished, only turkeys like Tony are done.

    ReplyDelete
  17. This is a good article but I think that Kansas City is tired of the dress code debate. We need to move forward. Get over it people, pull your pants up.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

TKC COMMENT POLICY:

Be percipient, be nice. Don't be a spammer. BE WELL!!!

- The Management