
Today, The Star decides to
sing the praises of women left behind as their husbands fight in Iraq. The article blithely paints a noble picture of these women:
Such is the wartime lot of the military spouse, whose address usually is where the parades end and real life begins.
And this is just a fucking lie and has nothing to do with "real" life. I respect every single troop (and maybe one or two generals but probably not) overseas. The word hero gets tossed around too loosely nowadays. While I'm sure I could probably
beat the shit out of somebody and take photos of them doing weird sexual stuff that wouldn't really qualify as heroic even if I did it at the request of White House officials . . . Still, the overwhelming majority of U.S. troops overseas are fulfilling their commitment to their utmost abilities. And if the mouth breathers at corporate offices in KC are any indication, honoring your commitments is rare indeed.
Anyway, while I respect the troops overseas their wives left at home are by in large the biggest hypocritical whores you could ever imagine. We've all heard the stories, we've seen them in local clubs or with strange cars parked in front of their houses. It's no secret why so many soldiers are
coming back from Iraq and subsequently going on shooting rampages or harboring some kind of mental illness. Being married to a woman who has been on her own for the past few months and years would drive any man crazy.
Put simply,
all women are whores and every single one of them cheat on their men when left unattended.
And your kneejerk reaction might be to say that this is somehow sexist or misogynist but it's exactly the same thing that men do as well. And while men may lie about it, women are far better at maintaining the pretense of "dignity" while juggling multiple dicks as taught to them by Oprah.
Let's hope that there is more truth to the propaganda about liberation and Democracy in Iraq than there is about the sanctity of marriage.
Almost everybody cheats. And leaving a partner alone, during a stressful period in a dire financial situation is nearly a recipe for sending them into the arms of another. Sadly, in this war there is no opportunity for soldiers to reciprocate because the bitches in burkas are not half as good looking as the "me so horny" broads of the Vietnam era . . . and for awhile it actually looked like we could win Vietnam, the same was only true in Iraq for about a half a week after the invasion.
Anyway, it doesn't matter. MOST PEOPLE GET DIVORCED. The only concern is that a returning soldier might show a similar disregard for the life of one of our precious white women as the American public has offered toward the wholesale loss of life by the Iraqis. I know that divorce court will make you wanna shoot somebody but it (she) is really not worth it.
Long term marriages that have survived the sobering statistics on infidelity and the ubiquity of modern day divorce have successfully answered one question: Are you okay with the fact that your partner's mouth has been on stranger's genitals while you were married?
Sadly, this is a question that confronts far too many returning soldiers and all varieties of married people. And while the troops deserve the respect of both supporters and detractors of the war in Iraq, their spouses are often nothing more than lying whores who sit at home and whine about their check not being big enough while cheating on their husbands . . . That's not exactly bravery but it's pretty typical of what most women would do in that situation.
And while this is exactly opposite of the nice picture of military family life painted by The Star today, anyone even vaguely familiar with women whose husbands are overseas will recognize some of the behavior that I've described. It makes me wonder, if the Star is so misguided about what really happens when soldiers are away or just the simple realities of marriage in this country . . . What else have they got wrong?