Monday, July 20, 2020

SHOW-ME CHARGES AGAINST STL MISSOURI MANSION COUPLE ACCUSED OF BRANDISHING GUNS ILLEGALLY!!!

A bold debate decision that has already resonated across the nation and now threatens to intensify the Missouri culture war . . . Read more:

Charges Filed Against McCloskeys, St. Louis Couple Who Pointed Guns Toward Protesters

Updated at 6:55 p.m. July 20, with the Missouri attorney general filing a request for the court to dismiss the charges and comments from state Rep. Rasheen Aldridge, D-St. Louis St. Louis Circuit Attorney Kim Gardner has filed charges against a St. Louis couple who confronted protesters with guns in June.

36 comments:

Anonymous said...

Good deal! Nobody is above the law. Pardon away if you want, they will still have spent money on lawyers. Should have stayed their dumbasses in the house.

Anonymous said...

9:23 hey dumbass, they are lawyers, plus they didn’t break the law, the rioters did. Now go ahead smarty pants, what real law did they break? Go ahead dummy, tell all of us.

Why did the rioters get off Scott free? They trespassed, threatened the owners with death and burning down their house and destroyed a perfectly good and very expensive gate. Did you miss that part or are you just that stupid???

Anonymous said...

9:30 Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.

Anonymous said...

Prepare for the ranting of 300-pound basement bois who aren't too clear about which end of a gun the bullet comes out of, but know that "The Second" gives these two the right to point guns at people.

Sure, pardon them, so they won't have to serve the hours of Community Service the Prosecutor is recommending, and please continue to spout the myth that "Them Bassers tore down them Gates", when the full Police Report indicates that no damage was seen by the Responding Officers, and the HOA President is on video record saying she had the Gates unlocked before and re-locked after the Demonstration passed by.

Parson better consider letting Trump issue the pardons, or else he'll find himself just another Republican footnote swept into the pages of History by the Trumpian/GOP Cataclysm of 2020.

Anonymous said...

They were on THEIR propert... you obviously have no right to defend yourself now.

Anonymous said...

9:35 you’re a stupid idiot

Anonymous said...

The stinking filthy ape rioters wouldn’t stand a chance in my front yard I would’ve wasted those fucking leftist pieces of filth

Anonymous said...

I guess all the video and pictures of the destroyed gate shown on tv were all fabricated huh? Jesus Christ you liberal fags can’t get anything right, what’s wrong with you freaks?

Take your crazy meds dear, your not acting like a sane person again.

Anonymous said...

The St Louis Prosecuting Attorney is a racist.

No wonder St Louis has the highest homicide rate per capita with Gardner as their Prosecuting Attorney.

Whites, Asians and Hispanics better think twice before voting for the Marxist, racist Democrat Party as the St Louis Prosecuting Attorney is yet another example of the support of anarchy.

The Democrats do not believe in the rule of law or the Constitution. Rather they want control of the country via a coup.

Anonymous said...


When the rioters broke down the gate entered onto private property didn't leave when told to, the property owners had every right to point their weapons.

Kimberly Gardner is under investigation anyway and she was caught using campaign money for her private residence. She had to pay a lot of money when she was found guilty. She is funded by George Soros and he tells her what to do. She's his prostitute. She has made a lot of people mad in SL including judges. The only problem is these people are democrats and have given large amounts of money to the democratic party. Maybe now they can see what a mistake that was.

Anonymous said...

The Missouri AG has already filed a brief to dismiss the charges.

The Ayatollah said...

The prosecutor is a crazy black lady... This will get thrown out or pardoned. This is a non-story now. I’ve seen their house. It’s surrounded by a shit part of town ...

Anonymous said...

stacy shaw says prosucate them stacy is a black commie bitch provocator ewe know what you do stacy shaw to cause trouble and stir up revolution

Anonymous said...

Only things black women prosecute successfully are forks, spoons and plates.

Anonymous said...

I said what I said. They will be convicted. They will spend $20000 in legal fees. They will be forever an internet meme. Parson can pardon all ge wants. They still should have stayed in the house.

Anonymous said...

Soros funded her election with $190,000.

The Ayatollah said...

Imagine if a bunch of people invaded your moms basement.... You should not have to stay on the futon under the stained blanket. You should have the right to jump up and protect your playstation and whip it’s.

Does this make sense?

Anonymous said...

Well, Soros overpaid. She is worthless

greg said...

You have to use equal force when defending yourself. If no protesters were armed, you can't point guns at them, as no gun threat exists. But you could wear the rifle slung across your chest, as that's always allowed on your own land. That would have worked. But unless threatened by deadly force, brandishing a gun is too much.

Anonymous said...

The lady is a cow. Mooo mooo

Anonymous said...

The prosecutor is a stupid pig. Oink oink.

Anonymous said...

Greg, not so. If you are in fear of your life, and being outnumbered 350 to two or whatever the number was would justify that, you can defend yourself with a gun. If someone pulls a knife on you and you are in fear of your life, you can shoot them.

Super Dave said...

This is all that needs to be said;

Shortly after Gardner's charges were announced, Attorney General Eric Schmitt's office filed an amicus brief urging the court to dismiss the case against the McCloskeys. John Sauer, Missouri's solicitor general, wrote that Missouri's laws "specifically authorize Missouri citizens to use firearms to deter assailants and protect themselves, their families, and homes from threatening or violent intruders."

Anonymous said...

Even with a gun, one hundred to one is not commensurate force. He only had a thirty round magazine in the rifle and could easily have been overwhelmed and killed, despite taking some of the cowards in the angry mob with him. The idea that a citizen protecting his home is not allowed to pull a gun until he sees a gun is completely fallacious. All he has to show is that he had a reasonable fear for his life, even without the Castle Doctrine. Being confronted by a large group of angry people is enough to establish that.

Kim Jong Un said...

But nobody wants to be the first 30.

Unknown said...

9:23 is a commie idiot.

Unknown said...

Agree. Go after that Soros creature and get her disbarred.

Anonymous said...

And yet they still got charged and being typical CHUDS they are, likely learned nothing. Don't be surprised if one or both are killed in a murder suicide soon by those very guns.

Anonymous said...

All these liberal pusses would be crying like bitches on the local news if someone stole their phone or scooter from their midtown porch. But they think it’s completely acceptable for a herd of protesting dirtbags to go onto someone’s fenced property threatening murder and arson.

Anonymous said...

9:23 must be worried that if he vandalizes or threatens a homeowner he will get shot. Best advice is to stay away from other's property unless invited. Don't scream obscenities and threats at homeowners when you outnumber the homeowner 100 to 1.

Anonymous said...

Apparently, they firearms were not loaded. Imagine a few hundred lawless criminal trespassers surrounding your home on your property. These two law abiding citizens decided to defend themselves against a mob who threatened to kill them. Only a stupid ass would think they did something wrong. Don't forget, the police were not going to be dispatched there. They had one recourse that sensible people pick. Defend yourself against lawless thugs and street scum.

Anonymous said...

@ 12:08 I call BS on that. You got that fair fight crap from watching westerns in mommies basement. Had just one trespassers thrown a brick in their direction the law allows deadly force. A brick can kill you. I would shoot. They would scoot.

Anonymous said...

She is ugly! Dude get a new wife. Brandishing is always illegal (except Texas). They were brandishing.

Anonymous said...

All those who decry the action need to read the MO Castle Doctrine. Reading is a good thing. It prevents proactive stupidity.

Anonymous said...

she is a sow

Anonymous said...

Really think after he shot the first 30 and they are lying on the ground, and gun is empty, the rest of the crowd will come for him. They would be running away from him. You have never been in combat. These people are not willing to give their lives. I dont see them currently dumping gas on top of themselves and lighting themselves of fire like the Monks often did in 'Nam. When do you think the 1st BLM protester is going to emolate themselves? NEVER! These were unarmed protesters walking to the mayors house. Nothing more.