TKC BREAKING NEWS!!! CLINTON ADAMS STAYS WINNING!!! HIS REDISTRICTING MAP PASSES!!!



So . . .

THE LAST MINUTE COMPLAINTS OF AN ANGRY MOB OF WHITE PEOPLE FROM WALDO/BROOKSIDE DIDN'T REALLY MAKE MUCH OF A DIFFERENCE IN THE WAY THAT NEW KANSAS CITY COUNCIL DISTRICTS HAVE TAKEN SHAPE!!!

The map recommended by the Redistricting Committee i.e. Steve Glorioso and John Fairfield et. al., passed just now.

What have we learned?

Well . . . This fight was over before it started . . .

Staying involved in KC politics is much better than showing up at the last minute . . .

The Vote was 11-1 with only Councilman Sharp objecting . . .

Unrelated . . .

It really was a shame to see so many white people come out and try to take away the voting rights of minorities in Kansas City. 

We hear that Mayor Sly's outburst was kind of epic during the discussion!!! He basically said it didn't really matter.

So, until the next census . . . Kansas City is going to look like this when it comes to voting.

Outcomes:

4th District Now Crosses The River into the Northland. A very smart TKC TIPSTER says this could be a chance to "change the culture" of the Midtown classically liberal and Democrat section of KC.

South KC reaches further into 4th . . . They claim they'll lose influence to the Ward Parkway Crowd . . . But c'mon, did they have much influence anyway?!?!?

Best of all . . .

AFRICAN-AMERICAN VOTES IN THE 3RD DISTRICT ARE NOW PROTECTED UNTIL THE NEXT CENSUS!!!

Credit to TKC TIPSTERS . . . We were the first to report this drama and now the first to break the news of it's conclusion . . .

Follow the whole redistricting drama via our label.

Comments

  1. No tweaks? So john sharp could have his BM? Or Circo her farm?

    ReplyDelete
  2. You forgot Tony. The Stadiums come out of the 5th District. That is huge.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Will this improve the 3rd District?

    No.

    It will continue to be a hell hole.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Sly is right. It doesn't really make a difference.

    ReplyDelete
  5. With Council Dud Sharp the Southland stays losing.

    ReplyDelete
  6. There is no possible map that would result in the election of even one decent council person. Maybe we need smaller districts.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Sharp's stomach problems must really be acting up about now.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I can't wait until the holidays are over and the community starts having meetings again. It will be interesting to see if Sharp gives us his poor me act or if he makes excuses.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Amen @ 6:11

    ReplyDelete
  10. Took about 6 months for the Mayor to witness the Sharp crap we have come to expect in the current and future 6th District. Sharp is a bully and he would burn the City down over racial divisions if it benefited him.

    ReplyDelete
  11. The voters in the 3rd Dostrict aren't at all protected from the folks they should be the most afraid of and who they have been taken advantage of for decades: people like Clinton Adams, Gwen Grant, the revs, and all the rest of the grifters who've made good livings through intimidation and extortion.
    Clinton Adams is a big-time loser who turns everything he touches into crap.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Waldo Warrior12/8/11, 7:20 PM

    second @; 7:13

    ReplyDelete
  13. Sharp makes Clinton Adams look like a beginner gifter. Look at how SKC, MAST, Hickman Mills School District has turned out under Sharp.

    ReplyDelete
  14. I feel badly for Waldo and Brookside. Sharp cares nothing about any of the sixth west of 71 highway. There's no way he's going to have any interest in Waldo and Brookside.

    ReplyDelete
  15. That's the point 8:17. West of 71 will run their own candidate and kick Sharp's ass. THATS was this was all about.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Tipster #8082912/8/11, 9:30 PM

    @8:49, Sharp can't run in the next election, so the worst he can do is anoint a successor (probably some loser like Bonnaye Mims, Jason Holsman, or Michael Brown). After leaving the City Council, Sharp will be working his connections that he has been serving while on the council (commercial interests over neighborhood interests), possibly in a paid position to lobby the city for taxpayer giveaways (TIF, CID) and to coordinate "leveraged" funding of trophy projects to line the pockets of developers, contractors, consultants, and other City Hall apparatchiks (projects which invariably degrade quality of life for people who live nearby).

    ReplyDelete
  17. No wonder people don't vote.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Sharp should be done. The Mayor should not allow someone who has created so much division to be chairperson of a committee. John Sharp has proven he doesn't put Kansas City ahead of his on personal interests.

    ReplyDelete
  19. This debate slowed down City progress, such a shame.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Even Scott Taylor abandoned John Sharp on this issue, continuing the icy relationship in the Sixth between the in-district and the at-large council members that started when Taylor's wife held the at-large seat.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Sharp's Committee resolves issues relating to pedicabs. Not like it matters anyway.

    Taylor showed BALLS. Good for him.

    ReplyDelete
  22. "It really was a shame to see so many white people come out and try to take away the voting rights of minorities in Kansas City."

    Go fuck yourself and your racist lies, Tony.

    ReplyDelete
  23. No one is trying to take away anyone's voting rights.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Tony, I could hear the sound of your lips smackin' Clinton's ass all the way in south KC. Try to be more subtle.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Once again, Tony, you try to give John Fairfield credit where none is due. That angry little Napoleon just lurks around trying to grab attention and credit. If he weren't Ed Ford's little buddy (and I do mean little), he would have no standing in KCMO.

    Glorioso is just a hanger on, looking for any paycheck he can grab. They're both gigantic losers.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

TKC COMMENT POLICY:

Be percipient, be nice. Don't be a spammer. BE WELL!!!

- The Management