TKC EXCLUSIVE!!! IN MINORITY CONTRACTOR CONTROVERSY KANSAS CITY HUMAN RELATIONS DEPARTMENT FINDS LACK OF "GOOD FAITH" EFFORT ON H&R BLOCK PROJECT!!!



From the outset, I've believed that the so-called Downtown Renaissance would ultimately leave out minorities and developers and contractors wouldn't live up to their agreements.

Now, THANKS TO KICKASS TKC TIPSTERS, I have the paper work which proves I'm correct.

Here's the background on this story that TKC has blogged for more than a year . . .

Today's a big day for this town, TIF and the so-called Downtown Renaissance because we'll find out if the TIF Commission will do the right thing and agree with a division in City Hall that H&R Block and J.E. Dunn didn't live up to their part of the agreement to include minority contractors . . . Meanwhile, The Kansas City Star is still running a love letter to the H&R Block in what almost looks like a paid advertisement rather than performing any of their "journalism" which they tout but rarely publish nowadays.

Here are the Kansas City reports which say they didn't and provide a lot of details as to how they allegedly gamed the system . . .

The latest, final, nicer draft appeared on May 8:



However, the even more direct memo was released last month:



Again . . . From a previous post . . .

Word on the street is that J.E. Dunn is applying political pressure and threatens to tear apart the City's MBE (Minority Business Enterprise) program if the TIF Commission rules against the H&R Block project. Also, there's talk that Kansas City could be on the line as well for big bucks if the TIF Commission finds in favor of minority contractors.

But even in the report . . . The biz in the minority community they're doing doesn't seem to be doing ANYONE any good. I think this is the money quote from the report:
It should be noted that throughout this project, J. E. Dunn engaged in contracting tactics with MBE's and WBE's that were designed to artificially boost the reported amount of MIWBE participation. As an example, Heartland Specialty Contractors, a majority contractor, submitted a bid for the drywall scope of work. According to internal documents from J. E. Dunn disclosed during the project manager's deposition, Heartland listed Skyline Construction, an MBE contractor, as a subcontractor. Heartland was asked by J. E. Dunn if it was possible to increase its minority participation. Heartland then suggested that Skyline could subcontract for the entire amount and Heartland would be listed as the subcontractor to Skyline. This would allow J. E. Dunn to count the entire contract amount, $2,427,742, as MBE participation. This arrangement was approved by J. E. Dunn. Skyline's bid to J. E. Dunn was the same amount, to the dollar, as the Healtland bid. J. E. Dunn simply allowed the two subcontractors to switch roles so that the entire amount of the contract could be counted as MBE participation. Skyline Construction was paid $536,000, or 22% of the contract.

This type of arrangement was used on other contracts during this project. These arrangements allowed J. E. Dunn to inflate its MBE participation numbers in a manner that was outside of the normal industry standard.
Even worse. . . Blame is being cast of City Manager Wayne Cauthen for having the report cleaned up which initially alleged even more details of despicable tactics used by H&R Block and J.E. Dunn in order to fake minority participation.

What all of this really means is that big companies are dictating how Kansas City reports are put together . . .

A major part in this story will be decided in a few hours.

Developing . . .

Comments

  1. So what happens now?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Kill de white people.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Why have quotas at all? Why not award the work to whomever can do the best job for the best price?

    Having quotas creates an impression that minorities and women are inferior. (Though we know TKC agrees with the latter.)

    ReplyDelete
  4. 12.2% out of 15% doesn't seem that bad to me.

    ReplyDelete
  5. so this is news????? that's how the wagon rolls bitches!

    ReplyDelete
  6. This is how the set aside game is played. It does little to help the true minority contractor. Most of the so called "minority contractors" are just entities formed by those with political connections. They have no intent of ever competing for jobs, they just suck off a little cream. If Dunn figured out a way to cut these people out so be it.

    ReplyDelete
  7. This is true...MBE's want to suck the cock of the big white boys but just end up taking it up the ass for them. No honest business ever becomes of this charade.

    ReplyDelete
  8. The minority contractor scam has run its course, the whole system should be scrapped. It is corrupt to the core.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Yep. It's time to give up. Let Dunn do it all. And please, don't question any of the ways that Dunn spends public money. It's all hopeless.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Racists suck Dunn Cock.

    Well.

    ReplyDelete
  11. This is just sad. The Dunns pose like they are great philanthropists in the KC community, but the best way to be a philanthropist is to be an honest business person and follow the law in the spirit of the law.

    ReplyDelete
  12. JE DUNN and Cauthern in bed togetherr? Presents a very strange picture, and not a very nice one. I say boycott H&R until they do something. After all if they did not want this type of thing to happen it wouldn't

    ReplyDelete
  13. I think the whole MBE/WBE system should be scrapped as well. Everything should be based on lowest qualified bidder, regardless of race or gender.

    I really don't think there should be any factor that would give one subcontractor an edge or another. It's all crap.

    ReplyDelete
  14. sheet. That's great but it still doesn't negate the fact that Dunn and Block took the TIF deals under those terms.

    We're a nation of laws, right?

    ReplyDelete
  15. What law did they break? They are called "goals" for a reason. If they (Dunn) made a good faith effort to acheive those goals it's the city who is going to have a hard time winning in court. It's that iffy language that will make it a loser for the city.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Both of you are wrong. It's an agreement not a law. There was a contract to fulfill the goals in good faith, H&R Block didn't do so.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Here's the real deal. Whatever percentage Dunn met, the developer would be able to claim that percentage for reimbursements. Keep in mind though that the city has funded most of the 300 million so were talking relatively small sums for MBE participation. Dunn fell short of the goal and will be able to claim for reimbursement that percentage he did meet (legitimately). So here's the real question one must ask - why should he recieve 100% credit if he only achieved about 90%? He will still get his 90%. Why does he want more? It is the same thing as an hourly worker who puts in 7 hours of work and then is whining and bitching because he will not get paid for 8. Ask any hourly worker on a Dunn project and see if Dunn will pay them the extra hour. Come on Terry Dunn, you bitch, answer me.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

TKC COMMENT POLICY:

Be percipient, be nice. Don't be a spammer. BE WELL!!!

- The Management