Dad Stays Losing In Facebook Jail: Show-Me Supreme Social Media Free Speech FAIL

Actually . . .

From what we can understand, the SCOTUS ruling isn't so bad given that decision was mostly about standing and not merit of the VERY COMMON PRACTICE of Feds dictating social media content guidelines.

Still .  . . 

For now . . . 

Reality Check: Government looms large over all of the apps on your phone. 

Most people already knew this and most doubt it'll change any time soon. 

Here are the basics . . .

In a 6-3 decision written by Justice Amy Coney Barrett, the court held that neither the states nor seven individuals who were co-plaintiffs in the case were able to demonstrate any harm or substantial risk that they will suffer an injury in the future.

Therefore, they do not have legal standing to bring a case against the federal government.

Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey, who inherited the lawsuit from his predecessor, has called the federal government’s actions “the biggest violation of the First Amendment in our nation’s history.”

Read more via www.TonysKansasCity.com link . . .

SCOTUS rejects Missouri lawsuit alleging feds bullied social media into censoring content * Missouri Independent

The U.S. Supreme Court arguments by Missouri and Louisiana that the federal government violated the First Amendment.


U.S. Supreme Court rules against Missouri Attorney General in social media censorship case

In a 6-3 decision, the court found that Missouri Attorney General and other plaintiffs did not have any standing to sue the Biden Administration and failed to prove that social media platforms acted due to government coercion.


U.S. Supreme Court rules against Missouri on social media free speech challenge - Missourinet

The U.S. Supreme Court has rejected Missouri's claim that the Biden Administration violated free speech rights when it encouraged social media sites to remove posts spreading misinformation about the COVID-19 pandemic. The 6 to 3 ruling found that the plaintiffs who brought the lawsuit had no legal standing to do so.

Comments