![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgmxR0KUjANrizNWyksSSx1aB-QfZM0SSV2S5Y8Nk1Ec8o6lQN_JIENEO-OokVnEZCBmpH2yxDqEKi6y4HL0HAdePfKrzCH-k0XyawwPD_Wlq9RmR3ln9CR9yT_ZfCbq0_CeeXrYw/s599/hawleytrumpagainlook.jpg)
Here's a quote from an extended interview that's worth checking out . . .
A vote to allow ballot banning of disfavored presidential candidates – whatever you think of Trump, he has not been convicted or even charged with insurrection – would be “grossly and blatantly unconstitutional,” he said.
“And if that goes forward, if that can happen, we will no longer have a constitutional republic. What will happen is, these petty state officials, many of whom are not even elected, will be able to say ‘I don’t like that candidate, therefore, I’m not going to put him on the ballot.’
Read more via www.TonysKansasCity.com link . . .
End of the republic? Allowing states to ban disfavored presidential candidates from the ballot would be just that, Sen. Josh Hawley argues
It would signal nothing less than the end of the American republic if the U.S. Supreme Court allows Colorado and other states to keep an unfavored presidential candidate off the ballot. That's th...
Comments
Post a Comment
TKC COMMENT POLICY:
Be percipient, be nice. Don't be a spammer. BE WELL!!!
- The Management