
This legal move was downplayed in local media.
From our vantage . . .
The abortion debate is now, MOSTLY, a losing fight against medical technology and we'll only continue to witness the inevitable casualties by way of watching the precipitous decline of the birth rate amongst the middle & upper classes in Western nations.
Now, here's more on the ongoing and probably futile effort to keep technology out of the hands of young American women . . .
"U.S. District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk in Amarillo said that Idaho, Missouri and Kansas had a right to intervene in the case, which was originally filed against the U.S. Food and Drug Administration by anti-abortion groups, rejecting the FDA's argument that the states had waited too long.
More deets . . .
"The FDA had argued, among other things, that the states had waited too long to try and be a part of the suit. However, the judge disagreed in the order, stating the states could argue their interests in the lawsuit. Judge Kacsmaryk, appointed by President Trump, previously suspended the use of the drug in what was called an unprecedented legal move in April of 2023."
Read more via www.TonysKansasCity.com links . . .
Texas judge grants motion allowing Idaho to join in lawsuit against FDA over Mifepristone
The lawsuit, originally filed by an anti-abortion group, would make it illegal for people in Idaho to access the drug. The FDA approved its safety over 20 years ago.
States can join lawsuit seeking to restrict abortion pill, judge rules
Three Republican-led states can join in a lawsuit seeking to restrict the availability of the abortion pill mifepristone, a federal judge in Texas ruled Friday, threatening to complicate a closely watched case the U.S. Supreme Court has already agreed to review.
Developing . . .
Comments
Post a Comment
TKC COMMENT POLICY:
Be percipient, be nice. Don't be a spammer. BE WELL!!!
- The Management