Amanda Adkins Moves Ahead Of Rep. Sharice Davids After Debate

The returns are in . . . The televised showdown didn't turn out well for the incumbent.

To wit . . . 

SHOCK!!! SURVEY SEYZ CONTENDER AMANDA ADKINS MOVES FORWARD FOLLOWING HER VICTORY IN LAST NIGHT'S DEBATE AGAINST SHARICE DAVIDS!!!

Actually, it's not so shocking.

Our blog community has noted that the challenger has been far more aggressive in recent weeks.

Recently, she was trailing in most polls . . . HOWEVER, her performance last night has powered a surge and a great deal of excitement from supporters.

Ms. Adkins connected with strong criticism against the Prez Biden administration and Rep. Davids simply wasn't nimble enough to answer the objections. 

Criticism about a few pauses from Rep. Davids is mere nitpicking and easily dismissed . . . What's more important was her inability to answer TOUGH QUESTIONS about her connection to unpopular White House policy & Prez Biden's record. From our vantage, that's what moved the dial.  

And so . . . 

We checked the reference and it's accurate . . . Ms. Adkins is now ahead by one as we move down to the wire. 

What's even more curious is that every news outlet in KC was sent this presser . . . But our humble blog is the only place putting it on blast . . . We feel like the news deserves more attention.

Check-it . . .

RATING CHANGE: Adkins Now Favored in KS-03

OVERLAND PARK, Kan. – Ahead of tonight's debate, FiveThirtyEight shifted their forecast for the KS-03 race to favor Amanda Adkins.

“Kansans are clearly ready for a change after two years of disastrous policies coming from Washington," Adkins stated.

The model also ranks KS-03 as the most competitive House race in the country.

The FiveThirtyEight model had previously listed Davids as a 1-point favorite in the race. Davids had been the favorite in the race since the end of August.

Despite outside groups pouring in more than $5 million to try and save Davids, the momentum is clearly on Adkins' side as we approach Election Day.
###

Developing . . .

Comments