Wednesday, July 01, 2020

Show-Me Veep Biden Beating Prez Trump In Missouri Seyz Democratic Party Polling

To balance the elaborate ruse . . . The polling features Missouri Auditor Galloway withing striking distance of Guv Parson.

We wanted to get to this one yesterday but it turned out that nobody really believed it . . . Checkit:

Poll finds Biden with narrow lead over Trump in Missouri

A new poll commissioned by Democrats finds former Vice President Joe Biden leading President Trump by 2 points in Missouri, which went for Trump by 19 points in 2016.

30 comments:

Anonymous said...

Fake News.

Anonymous said...

The poll should have probably asked more people than just Peters-Baker and Lucas.
Polls are tailored to get the results the folks paying for them want and polling has also become much less accurate with more and more people unwilling to answer their cell phones.
Anyone who thinks Missouri will go for Biden in November is delusional.
And the longer the riots go on and the mob's demands become more extreme, the larger the Trump margins will become.

Anonymous said...

Hard to believe any thinking person could vote for a geriatric mess like mubbling Joe "Sniff Em" Biden.

Anonymous said...

^^^^And yet many would vote for an inanimate object over the Great Pumpkin. Weird.

Anonymous said...

As much as you Botskis refuse to face it, "The LONE LIAR" has alienated those that put him in Office pretty badly.

Plus, this time he doesn't have Hillary to run against.
Plus, he's already given up, and is ready to walk away from yet another failure.
Plus, the damage to his oversized ego with a stroke added to his metal anguish, has left him badly shaken.

Anonymous said...

With all the lies the entrie Democratic Party told to try to get Trump out of office during his entire term, it's only fair that he gets another four years to keep taxes low, secure our borders, keep the military strong and drive unemployment again to record lows. The Dems have reached a new low by their harassment of a duly-elected president. The first thing Biden and the Dems will do is raise taxes on all income levels so the Dems can fulfill their socialist wet dreams. If you want your take-home pay cut in half, vote for Batty Basement Biden.

Anonymous said...

^^and yet Biden wins easily and you better start preparing for that inevitability. Look into killing yourself. Soon. Weird.

Anonymous said...

^^And you are wrong, Sperger. Weird.

Anonymous said...

8:23: And yet they aren't lies; they were only unsuccessful because our dishonest president had an dishonest Senate and a corrupt Attorney General to plaster over the cracks in the Great Pumpkin's facade. Voters have discovered you can only put so much makeup on a dead pig. Weird only that it took so long for them to figure it out.

Anonymous said...


The polls also said Dewey won over Truman. The polls also said Hillary was in the lead too. I don't recall having voiced my opinion in a poll and neither did you.

Anonymous said...

Stick in the mud vs. DJT - Stick in the mud wins a close one
Pile of dog shit vs. DJT - Pile of dogshit wins in a landslide
2 year old vs. DJT - 2 year old takes it easily.

Anyway, Trumptards, please, tell me why I should cast my vote for DJT. Not why I shouldn't vote for Biden. If past performance is any indicator of future performance, why?

Anonymous said...

Haha right. Just like the Hillary Landslide. Now we got a dementia Joe Landslide.

Anonymous said...

The 2016 Election was Hillary the Hated versus an "Unknown Quantity", and the "Unknown" squeaked by because of that dumb-assed undemocratic Electoral College.

Things are different now, the "Unknown" is known all too damn well!
Trump is toast!

Anonymous said...

8:49: Good post except the two year old wouldn't qualify. The rest could probably legally be sworn in. The dog shit would certainly do a better job.

Anonymous said...

8:44 & 9:00: And yet Hillary was unpopular and STILL won the popular vote. Weird in a lightning doesn't strike twice in a kind of way.

Charles Whitman said...

I'm still voting for Trump.

Anonymous said...

^^Good for you retard! Have you learned to tie your shoes yet? Keep trying!

Anonymous said...

It would be interesting to see how those voter roles looked in CA and NYC when Clinton won the popular vote. But since we use the electoral college, it doesn’t really matter. DJT won according to the rules.

Anonymous said...

^^ good choice

Anonymous said...

The White House couldnt reach Trump for 3 hours yesterday. He was golfing anf had all phones off, even the Chief of Staff. Now what if a war or 9/11 had happened. If most people went missing off their jobs for 3 hours they would be fired. He is not presidential material. He get horrible golf scores, and puts the nation at risk to obtain them. Or he was meeting up with stormy to have unprotected sex with her again.

Anonymous said...

Who has unprotected sex with a sex worker like Stormy Daniels? Did he bring home a STD to his wife? I guess only she knows!

Anonymous said...

Only with our Electoral College could a loser like Donald Trump become a winner.

Anonymous said...

Our Electoral College is a pretty good system.

Anonymous said...

^^If you are a retard it is. Are you a retard???

Anonymous said...

Polls aren't designed to measure public opinion. They are designed to influence public opinion.

Anonymous said...

And yet that would be pointless. Weird.

Anonymous said...

The states have popular vote. The electoral college is for the president and the vice. What should it be replaced with?

Anonymous said...

Well, that's not true. Sure, they saw that publishing election results for closed states influenced those states that were open, so they now delay broadcasting election numbers until all states are closed.

Anonymous said...

5:28: The fact that you're asking that question indicates a lack of comprehension on your part. In a democracy what would you think a system that was designed to give weighted representation to a region that was able to claim representation for 3/5ths of a population that at the time was property should be replaced with?

One person one vote might just be the way to go.

Anonymous said...

Really, 1945, I know quite a bit about the Electoral College in America. Probably more than most. I dont believe a popular vote for president and vice would be fair to those states more sparsely populated.
But you have examined the alternatives, and think popular vote is the best way to elect a president and a vice? The heck with those that don't live and vote in large cities?