Wednesday, July 08, 2020

Prez Trump & Guv Parson Secure STL, Sorta

The third best town in Missouri is secure in name only . . . (Fact check: Columbia & St. Joe are tied for 2nd place) and STL is more like a 4th rate East Cost burg . . . Read more:

Trump urges Missouri Gov. Mike Parson not to rename St. Louis

President Trump said Tuesday he opposes a campaign to rename St. Louis. "You won't be changing the name St. Louis, will you?" Trump asked Missouri Gov. Mike Parson at a White House event on reopening schools during the coronavirus pandemic. "No, we will not be doing that," the Republican governor replied.

27 comments:

Anonymous said...


Change St Louis name for an antisemitic jew hater. I don't think so. Keep it up liberals and you are pushing more people over to our side.

Anonymous said...

How about the fact that our POTUS sold out our own troops to Russia and still hasn't said shit, not one disparaging remark or warning to Putin.....to this fucking day. Or are we just bent out of shape over statues and names of cities. Yeah, that shit's more important than our own troops. Loser fucking Trumptards.

I'm sure you assholes don't have relatives over there in harms way so it's of no concern to you.

Anonymous said...

^^^Oh shut the fuck up loser

Anonymous said...

remember, it would be wrong to make mischief, kansas city

Anonymous said...

Or how about the fact that POTUS paid Russian prostitutes to piss on a bed that Obama slept on while in Russia. Oh wait, that wasn’t true either though we had to listen to that wild allegation for three years before the angry left finally gave up on it. Maybe these wild allegations will last through the election, before they are finally proved to be lies too.

Anonymous said...

And yet with all that is going on, Trump decides to concentrate on this. Weird.

Anonymous said...

Obama was far more accommodating to Putin than Trump. Put another way, Trump has been a lot stricter against Russia than Obama ever was. And who can forget (no matter how much we want to) Hillary's misspelled "Reset" button? The Dems have a lot to answer for, but they have no answers.

Anonymous said...

^^^^And yet neither do the Republicans. Weird.

Anonymous said...

Really 9:52? Was he accommodating enough to simply sit out the fact that Putin is rewarding Taliban for killing our service members? You got anything at all comparable to that you fucking Trumptard asshole? Cuz I'd sure love to hear it boot licker. Take your whataboutism and stick it up your bootlickin autocrat lovin ass. Why don't you move to Russia you fucking traitor.

Good one 9:29. You got nothin better huh. Maybe tell that to a veteran you fucking pile of shit. Sell out all your values for some fucking shitty ass POTUS who couldn't manage his way out of a paper fucking bag.

Trumptards...all you fuckers do is wallow around in the cesspool of shit because apparently that Orange fat fuck in the WH has some sort of trance over your dumb fucking asses.

Byron Funkhouser said...

Why is the retard in the White House so against renaming anything?

In a democracy the people make these decisions, not the dictator.

Anonymous said...

10:56, did you forget your happy pill again this morning?

Anonymous said...

Nutjob at 10:56: the intelligence agencies have not been able to corroborate that charge. Obviously you have, or you wouldn't do such spittle flecked rant. Will you let us know what your corroborative evidence is? Or do you accept it as true just because you want it to be true? That's called confirmation bias, and you have it in spades.

Anonymous said...

11:52 and 11:55 - what, it's ok to put bounties on our soldiers? I'm overreacting? And yeah it's been fucking corroborated. Is it corroborated enough when our intelligence warns other countries and their soldiers? What's the matter, Fox News didn't confirm it for you so it's just non existent information? Is that the case? We gonna have to have Fox say it live on air for you to believe it? I'd post links but ya know, fake news, right?

Go fuck yourself and your phony ass patriotism. Your a fucking traitor scum and so is our POTUS.

Here's another newsflash assholes. Our POTUS has made his disdain for our intelligence community abundantly clear and oh, yeah, he lies all the fucking time. Continue to lick those boots assholes. He'll tell when he wants you to move up to sucking his cock and I'm quite sure you'll oblige.

Anonymous said...

11:55 - uh, there's been a monetary link that sane people would consider 'corroborating' but you carry on with your undying support.

Anonymous said...

Wow, someone is still quoting this story as if it's true. One more time for you: Washington Post walked the story back, both the National Security Advisor (and council) and the Pentagon have stated there's no reliable evidence, and Adam Schiff (intelligence committee) knew about this a long while ago and took no action, implying no meat in the sandwich.

Hell, even John Bolton has clammed up about it now, and he will literally say anything to promote himself.

Spare me the fake outrage, doofus. The violation of our shared culture on behalf of a Marxist tantrum/thug mob is far more important than your dead spin.

Anonymous said...

Please see above, fake outrage dipshit.

Anonymous said...

Again, you seem to be out of your tiny mind. The reason the press has mostly dropped the story is that the clear consensus in the defense/intelligence community is that there's no real evidence it ever happened.

Just think for a second. Difficult for you, but try. Do you think the Taliban needed any incentive to kill our soldiers? Why would the Russians risk such a stupid plan if they knew the consequences of disclosure would far outweigh the benefits? And are the Russians and Taliban, after the equivalent of a Vietnam that was no good for either side, now on such good terms that they can engage in a pointless and risky collaboration to bounty American soldiers when the Taliban is going to kill them with or without money?

Look, I know your only motivating passion in life is hating Trump. Believe me, we get it. But it shouldn't be too hard to find another bullshit story to get pissed off about. ;)

Anonymous said...

And yet the Wall Street Journal, hardly a left-wing rag, had an article on it just to day. Weird.

Anonymous said...

You mean sane people like the defense/intelligence/national security apparatus on both sides of the aisle?

Because they don't. Let it go, Fake Outrage Man!

Anonymous said...

Stunning evidence. Do go on.

Anonymous said...

3:09, you mean the article where a commanding general says there is no evidence that the supposed Russian payment scheme caused a single American troop death? Not at all weird.

Anonymous said...

^^^He said he needs more evidence dumb dumb. The CIA and other "personal" based intelligence agencies are saying there's a bounty situation while other agencies who look for more "causation" links are not ready to go there yet.

Let me guess, you dumb fucking cocksuckers who doubt this shit all were right there saying Benghazi was the on the up and up too? Amirite you fucking hypocrites? Maybe Trump or some one in his administration could spend a few days in front of Congress like Hiliary? Nah, they'd just ignore any request.

The evolution of the WH story in response to this is concerning enough, unless you're a fucking boot licking cult member.

Anonymous said...

3:48: The article in which he said there was a payment scheme but there are no known American casualties of the scheme. Yes.And he didn't used the word "supposed."

Anonymous said...

Lots of TDS here.

Trump's Delusional Sycophants.

Try reality for a change.

Anonymous said...

But what about all those fucking emails, amirite? Let's get our priorities straight. And a splash of Benghazi to top it off?

Anonymous said...

Well, in reality we like evidence before we chase after horseshit.

Anonymous said...

I hope you're real and not trolling, because I love your stupidity.

Mkay. Sort of like we need more evidence for Bigfoot or UFOs. Gotcha.

Nope. Today the head of CENTCOM also pissed on your crazed anti-Trump birthday cake, as the NSA has been doing as well. So, you know, I would take their word over yours. And whatever Rachel Maddow episode you saw. ;)