Tuesday, October 01, 2019

TKC MUST READ!!! KANSAS CITY TRANSIT ACTIVIST CLAY CHASTAIN DEFENDS PREZ TRUMP AMID IMPEACHMENT DRAMA!!!



This town's most prolific petitioners offers his insight into the current national drama and lead up to election 2020. Take a look:

Clay Chastain: "If Trump has not committed a crime, then let the voters, not lowly Congress, determine his fate."

I did not vote for Trump (I wrote in my former wife's name) but, since no other high profile leader in Kansas City will stick out their neck to defend the bullying of an American President in his time of need, then I will. Trump is not perfect, and neither are the liberal, self-righteous and bully-acting democrats trying to impeach him.

If it can be proven quickly that President Trump committed a crime (or an illegal act) for his own benefit, involving his phone call to the Ukrainian President, then impeachment must follow. But, if the impeachment-salivating liberal Democrats come up empty again, then it is they who should be ousted from office by American voters. In other words, in this on-going game to impeach a duly elected Republican President they dislike, there must be a severe penalty to all democrats involved with bringing forth (yet) another false charge against Trump. Thus far, this unrestrained and partisan Congressional posse has wasted the nation's time trying to run down and smear a President while neglecting to solve our nation's problems.

And, the first to go should be one of its most out spoken leaders - Congressman Adam Schiff. Remember, Schiff is the one who all told us on TV that he had observed first hand undisclosed facts that proved President Trump colluded with Russia. Adam Schiff has posted on his web this statement, " Coercing a foreign nation to interfere in our election is never OK." How Mr. Schifff, is asking for a "favor" coercion? How could it be coercion Mr Schiff, when the Ukrainian President himself said, "he felt no pressure"? How could it be coercion Mr. Schiff, when there was no quid quo pro discussed in the transcript? This politician should have the the most to lose if it turns out Trump did not commit an impeachable crime.

Trump's personality and style of governing may be disturbing to many, but if he has not committed a crime then the judgment of his actions as President should rest with the American voters in 2020, not a biased problematic governmental body whom Americans trust the least.

Most people agree that President Trump can sometimes act like a jerk. Nevertheless, many Americans also agree, including this conservative engineer, that he stands for something meaningful like ...bringing back manufacturing jobs to America, standing up to China and better trade deals for America, securing our border from illegal entry, keeping America out of foreign wars, lowering taxes and regulations and building a stronger sustainable United States economy.

And towards those ends, what have the liberal Democrats done to help make America great again? Try to use the liberal media and further their own party by continually trying to harass, humiliate and oust a duly elected and succeeding American President.

Kansas City community activist, Clay Chastain
###########

Further reading:

Fox News: Trump dares Congress, brandishing deep-red 2016 election map: ‘Try to impeach this’

CNN: The latest on the Trump impeachment inquiry

AP: Pompeo accuses Democrats of bullying in impeachment probe

You decide . . .

53 comments:

Anonymous said...

Trump/Chastain 2020

Considering that he already lives in Virginia.

Anonymous said...

"Clay Chastain: "If Trump has not committed a crime, then let the voters, not lowly Congress, determine his fate."

No problem there, but let's have the inquiry to get the facts out. Who knows? Maybe an intern gave him a blow job.

Super Dave said...

For once I agree 100% with Clay

Anonymous said...

Can we also all agree that Bryan Stalder is a complete fucking faggot?

Anonymous said...

in b4 lib shills have nothing of value to say and just name call because they don't have a fact based argument

TKC=Sad Clown said...

You have shoveled a ton of shit on this blog, TKC, but this is some of the smelliest! #ITMFA

Anonymous said...

No thanks Clay, I'll let Congress decide. That's the process in this country, don't like it? You can leave.

Anonymous said...

Hey, I got a fact-based argument for you. It's a FACT that you have a thing for sucking off trannies. Faggot.

Anonymous said...

An impeachment debate between Chastain and Jason Pander!
A battle of wits between two unarmed men!
Only in KCMO!
And the whole country breathlessly awaits the results!
Hahahahaha!!

Anonymous said...

^^No moron, just you. That's because your wife is dead and you don't have anything else to do.

Anonymous said...

^^To bad it's not you who is dead.

Anonymous said...

12:53: Oh, and which of the trannies was you? Was it as good for you as it was for me? Remind me.

Anonymous said...

It's called an impeachment inquiry. I'm sure that little drip, drip, drip will turn into a full on leak. More and more will continue to come out. What's sad in our country these days is the hypocrisy. If Obama said/did a fraction of the things Trump has done, he'd be impeached too.

BTW, what's the latest conspiracy theory Republicans? I haven't been caught up on my nuttiness today.

Anonymous said...

Nah, it's cslled the latest in the Dems' silly arsenal of made up shit. I haven't checked the New York Times or the Washington Post's retractions today, it's very hard to keep up with all the fiction. :)

You mean a conspiracy like Russiagate? Or The Second Kavanaugh Rape Hoax? Or Sharpiegate? The list of wacky Democrat conspiracies marches on. Can you go check and see if Maddow is still breathless and teary-eyed about Russian weather control?

Or this latest bullshit, whose only actual effect is to help raise money for Trump and to reject Biden from the race.

Try harder.

Anonymous said...

^^Don't have to try at all. Cadet Bonespurs is doing all the work himself. At this rate he will have nobody left to throw under the bus. It's happening. Deal with it. :(

Anonymous said...

@12:43, that would be classic. Two of the biggest panderers in KCMO politics (well except for the "in KCMO" part. Will say anything to make whatever group they're talking to feel good.

Anonymous said...

Oh Chimpy. Political discussions are for humans! LOL

Retro ROCKER said...

The Democrats have to play the Impeachment Game. They Don't have a candidate That can Defeat Trump. Sleepy JOE AS we have known for a Long time has been lining his pockets with Chinese Money .Along with Hillary .And his Problems with his son and Ukraine .They are going to throw so,many Fake allegations along with the Main stream media .until the Election. Don't be Surprised if Hillery wants to run again .

Anonymous said...

^^^^Oh hell, Pocahontas takum orange man scalp, which hidum giant turd.

Anonymous said...

Who cares what the reason are?? The republicans didn't need one when they impeached Clinton. Let's get the party started! The comedy value of watching The big orange dufuss shit himself on twitter is worth it. Hell, several months of this scrutiny and he'll confess to everything! His administration is such a shit show! This is going to be fun!

Anonymous said...

Hey @1:57, did you read the Mueller report? Ah fuck that, I'm sure you didn't. You probably read the Barr cliffs notes version. The second Kavanaugh sexual assault allegation which was corroborated by multiple people? Man, I hope you don't have daughters. Should something, God forbid, ever happen to one of them, I'm not sure you'd believe them. Sharpiegate? Really, are you denying that dipshit in the WH drew a fucking extra line on a weather map because he mispoke and said that Alabama was in the hurricane line of fire but couldn't muster the gumption to admit he was wrong? You consider that made up shit by Democrats?

Fuck dude, everything that happens to Trump is his own fucking doing. You know why, cuz no one, NO ONE, ever checks that asshole. He's never been told No in his fucking life. All he's done is run businesses into the ground. Yet, you think Dems are out here just creating all these issues for him. Guess what pal, you're his mark, plain and simple. You've been grifted by the king of the grifters. And here you are, still serving your loyal subservient role.

I'll tell you what, Hiliary sat in front of Congress for 11 hours for Benghazi, if your boy is so innocent, why doesn't he step up and sit in front of Congress and answer some questions?

Anonymous said...

Republicans are gutless. Trump is an evil lowlife fool. Get rid of him anyway possible. The sooner the better.

Anonymous said...

They did have reasons to impeach Clinton. He was caught lying to everyone, impeached, and disbarred.

Trump runs rings around the woke-joke media. Watching Schiff make up quotes from Trump was comedy gold...

Anonymous said...

^^Trump runs??? Hahahaha!! LOL!! You know Schiff made up those quotes? Howdo you know? Oh, Trump said so! Dude, go back to Faux News, you're talking points are as stale as your diaper. You embarrassed yourself with that post.

Anonymous said...

Donald Trump is the shit-stain on America's underwear. His supporters are the dingle berries attached to it's ass.

Anonymous said...

I did read it. You obviously didn't, or you'd read what it still says last I checked, which was no collusion. Say it with me so you'll remember, because it's a bit embarrassing when you keep forgetting that. Maybe you're still watching the Rachel Maddow Extended Psychosis version. :)

Ok. Kavanaugh part 2? You mean the allegations that were shot down almost as easily as the first set? Part 2 was even funnier, because the so-called witnesses don't even remember the party in question. That's why the the story moved on so fast, because like the first one it was completely made up. I'm truly sorry you can't read, sport, but the rest of the world saw the New York Times screw up yet again. Catch up.

(Special note: Anyone who would find themselves on any Clinton's side should probably think a few times before moralizing about the fate of vulnerable daughters)

Moving on. Sharpiegate is just more hysteria. A line on a map. Impeach!! Impeach!! The Russians are behind that one too, or are we mixing up our desperate hoaxes? Do we need to drag out every arrogant mistake of Obama's for comparison?

Anyway, this is why you're not good at this. You assume I'm a Trump supporter (false), and you really have no place in a discussion about matters of fact because half your post is--big surprise--just more frothing hatred for a duly elected President. Take a few deep breaths and let that one sink in. Bet you can't.

Finally, here's the rub. Why do you even need Trump to testify? As Adam Schiff showed last week, you're happy to make up quotes from Trump wholesale.

Look, you're obviously mad. I get it. You hate Trump and Orange Man Bad and stuff. But you should really try to calm down before you look even sillier.

Anonymous said...

He did make them up, Chimptastic. He was on TV defending having done so. Or don't they allow that channel in the monkey house? LOL

Anonymous said...

^^and yet, after all that...he's still going to be impeached. Weird.

Anonymous said...

^^True Dat

Anonymous said...

Chimpy! I know monkeys aren't good at human politics, but even a dumb monkey like you knows that even if a vote happens in the House it will die in the Senate.

Poor Chimpy. Another coconut while you ponder your next post? LOL

Anonymous said...

But consider this: The facts come out, and he's guilty of some pretty serious shit. (Not sayin' he's guilty, but who knows what will come out?) One third of the Senate runs for re-election next year, including Moscow Mitch.

Do you think they're going down with a sinking ship?

Anonymous said...

Why oh why do you keep giving this gadfly a platform. Please oh please let him wither.

Anonymous said...

^^^Good question. Maybe because he doesn't seem to understand there is a chance Trump has done some serious shit.

Anonymous said...

I think time is not on the Democrats' side. They wasted three years on Russiagate, which failed to even get close to removing Trump from office. There have been so many bogus scandals, so many retractions, and so much obviously biased negative press attention that any legitimate crime has to be proven that much more to rise above the constant noise.

Who knows? The Ukraine scandal ain't it. The clock is ticking toward an election, and impeachment isn't very popular except among the wokesters.

Time will tell.

Anonymous said...

Sorry, this isn't really about impeachment, the bar for that is pretty high. This is about fundraising for the Dems. going into an election year. Many left wing donors have conditioned donations on impeaching Trump.

That's the way Washington works, but where not really supposed to know that, were just supposed to go home and yell at our TV's - Political Theater (and patronize the sponsors, of course).

Anonymous said...

Doubtful. Trump appears to like consent, unlike President Rape Kit.

Anonymous said...

3:58, no, this is about trying to politically discredit the administration and the DOJ before the hammer drops in the investigation of wrongdoing that led to the Mueller report. It is intended to give the Dems an opportunity to cry foul when many among them are perp walked to the calaboose.

Anonymous said...

The voters did determine his fate, he lost the popular vote by a landslide but rural small town Christian America wants to make America great again with a lying, cheating snake oil salesman who continues to fool the dum dums in our country. Trump is always doing some seriously scandalous stuff. He just uses his lawyers, money and influence to weasel his way out of it.

NicK said...

good thing his opinion dosent mean shit fuc off clay

Anonymous said...

Here's the rub @3:18, the Mueller report paraphrased that Trump and his lackey's were too dumb to collude with Russians. You assholes keep going back to this as if it's a badge of honor. On the flip side, the report showed no less than 10, fucking 10, instances of obstruction of justice that over 3000 prosecutors across the country were in full agreement would be indictable if Trump were not POTUS. Yet, you all fucking gloss over this fact. Is that not impeachable, to obstruct justice?????? Just fucking quit already with the no collusion. We know that. It's the other shit.

The lady at the center of the Kav shoving his dong in her face incident doesn't remember it, several other people do though. But whatevs, they're all liars and politically motivated.

Fucking sharpiegate is all Trump and it just highlights what a fucking narcissistic dip shit he is. Guy makes a stupid statement that is completely wrong and is corrected by the adults. This is common occurrence with this idiot that apparently, you're cool with. I guess I hold my President to a higher standard. And are you fucking kidding me about Obama? Do you really want to get into a scorecard over who lies and misleads. Fuck, tell you what, I'll take George Bush, hell any President in the modern times (maybe exclude Nixon). NO ONE, I mean NO ONE, comes close to the day in and day out lying our current POTUS lives on. Prove me wrong here.

So, it's cool to obstruct an investigation? Is it cool for a President to call up another President and ask him to dig in on a political opponent? And now, you're gonna sit here straight faced and say, "meh, no big deal" and tell me you're not a Trump supporter. I call bullshit. You've been grifted by a guy who's been declaring bankruptcies and screwing the small contractors all his life. At least own it man.

Anonymous said...

This is why you fail. You cannot conceive of why someone would vote positively for Trump.

Also, there was no landslide and an eighth grader, unlike yourself, knows about the Electoral College.

Hyperblogal said...

Clay, a very wise man once said, "Better to be silent and thought a fool, than to open your mouth and remove all doubt."

Anonymous said...

Mkay. I'll play along some more and try to find your points amongst all the rageposting.

So you admit that there was no Russian collusion. That's great and a real step forward. There's no reason to rage about it, though. The problem with your ten counts of obstruction of justice is that there's no collusion, hence no underlying crime. I mean, you agree that there was no collusion despite three years of full court press on that assertion, right?

You also might check Mueller's definition of obstruction of justice, which seems to be his own invention. Mueller seems to think that the President exercising his first amendment rights to free speech amounts to obstruction. Anyway, Mueller's whole investigation was a keystone cops shit show, with investigators getting fired, FISA warrants obtained fraudulently...give it up. The Russia hoax is dead in the water where it belongs.

As far as Kavanaugh, you basically gave up on this one but look at the reporting from the Wall Street Journal--heck, even the two authors who were selling their Kavanaugh book at the same time. The New York times is still recovering from their embarrassment over the story. And yes, 100% politically motivated as was transparent about both stories from the beginning. Otherwise why did the whole thing go away so fast? Hmm.

You seem to get angrier as it goes on, so let's see. I do have to say that your blind hatred of Trump basically discounts you from a sane discussion of anything. For evidence I would suggest Sharpiegate--something that no one but you cares about, but for you is just more fuel for the jihad.

Lists of Obama's lies are easily found. I know you want me to do the work for you to make up for your lack of sane arguments, but what about "You can keep your doctor?" What about his shifting stance on warrantless wiretapping? No less than the Washington Post has a list of his ten biggest lies (easily searchable) called 'Obama's ten biggest whoppers.'

Let me know when you're finished sport.

And your final paragraph. Yikes. So you're not aware that Joe Biden is on camera defending doing what Trump is accused of on behalf of his crackhead son? And isn't Hillary well-known to have been digging up dirt from the Ukraine in 2106 on her...political opponent? Ya gotta read, man.

Finally, I know you're locked into a rigid, black and white worldview because of your pointless rage. I'm not a Trump supporter, whether you want to believe it or not. I even voted for Obama once.

Don't argue when you're angry. Or are you always angry?:)

anonymous said...

No, @5:58, the Mueller report said there was no indictable legal proof of collusion discovered, not that there was "no collusion".

We know by sworn testimony that there was at least one attempt at collusion made by the Trump Campaign, that was verified under oath by Donald J. Trump Jr.! Perhaps the alt-Right is now calling the President's son a liar? We also know that the President lied publicly about his son's attempt at committing collusion, first denying that it happened, then claiming that he did not know about it, in direct contravention to what his own son testified to under oath.

Then consider the matter of Russian contributions to the Trump Campaign routed through the NRA. Both the Wayne Lapierre of the NRA and Trump deny that they happened, but Maria Butina, the Russian Operative, was found guilty on Federal Court of making those contributions, and sits in prion today for having done so.

No collusion? Not according to Mueller, just not enough proof of collusion found in his Investigation to bring charges on that count, unlike the ten recommendations for charges of Obstruction Of Justice.

So, in order to believe there was "no Collusion", we have to accept that the entire Trump Campaign staff and Trump himself were too stupid to collude.

And we have to accept the idea that Trump's own son was lying under oath to Congress to involve his own Father in illegal activities.

And that the Mueller report was accurate when it said it did not find sufficient evidence to bring charges of collusion, but was wrong when it said they did find evidence of ten instances of Obstruction.

And that a Federal Grand Jury and Federal Court convicted a Russian Operative and sentenced her to Prison on the basis of a false confession that she made and a false guilty plea from her.

If you can accept these premises, they you have at least some basis for distorting the findings of the Mueller Investigation to say they prove "no collusion". Otherwise...

Anonymous said...

so , so obvious that the democrats all are brain dead lemmings that do , think ,act and speak like they are suppose to do . These morons have been trying to smear , destroy and get rid of our rightfully elected president from day one . the true Americans that voted for our President last time are energized as are those who have gained from his policies over the last 3 years will vote for President TRUMP in 2020 in a LANDSLIDE victory for 4 MORE YEARS !!!

Anonymous said...

So, once again, parse it as you will:

No collusion. No basic crime. And it's worth noting that Mueller, after three years and many millions, did not even take a stand on prosecution of the strangely-defined 'obstruction'. This was left to Barr/Rosenstein, who declined to prosecute the flimsy charges. Do you remember the laugh riot when the Russians identified by Mueller as 'colluders' actually showed up? Mueller ran for cover. This is very thin gruel for three years, media-wide hysteria, and tons of resources. But then, the whole extended mess was meant only to drive Trump's approval numbers down, and it didn't work.

What becomes more and more clear as Barr's investigation ramps up is the Nixonian overreach of the Obama administration. From the fraudulently obtained FISA warrant to the once-denied surveillance of the Trump campaign to the partisan hacks used as 'investigators'...it's about to get really interesting.

Anonymous said...

Weird, again @5:58 Federal prosecutors all across the US are in agreement that had the POTUS not been POTUS, he would have been indicted for obstruction. So, apparently the definition of obstruction is an invention of Mueller, and, what, like 3000 other federal prosecutors? Damn, that's some sort of conspiracy huh?

Sharpiegate, concocted by Trump but I guess calling Trump out on his idiocracy is raging?

Did I say Obama never lied or mislead during his tenure. I think all politicians do, would you agree? The extent to which our current POTUS does it and over the most mundane things at times is, let's be honest here, embarrassing. And like I said, I'll put any President, Republican or Democrat up against Trump and he will win the lie Olympics hands down.

So, I guess because others did what Trump did like you say, it's cool that he's doing what he does. Got it. Why hold the guy in the WH currently to a higher standard when everyone else is doing it. Kind of like telling Russians you're not concerned with their election meddling because, hey, the US meddles in elections too.

Good to hear you voted for Obama once. Do you have a black friend too?

Anonymous said...

I think we can all agree on one thing....Trump's Presidency, no matter who is responsible, has been a shit show from Day 1. Why, is debatable, but it's a fact it has been.

Anonymous said...

False.

Anonymous said...

Good morning Rageboy. Your arguments have not improved overnight, I see.

Well, the truth of the matter is that the justice process in question is not a majority vote. 3000 prosecutors, 10,000 prosecutors. It just doesn't work that way. I know you hate this, but ten flimsy 'obstruction' charges cobbled together using brand new definitions of obstruction, and which went absolutely nowhere, is a pretty weak return on all that time, money, expense, and hysteria. Ya gotta let it go.

Again, the AG is looking into how the whole corrupt mess got started. That's the real investigation, and we'll just have to see how it goes.

So one after the other you abandon your arguments, leaving us with this notion that Trump lies more than any politician ever, holy cow Orange Man is bad. Again, your venomous bias invalidates your opinion. If you want to do a lie tabulation President by President I'm sure we'd all be interested. But your assertion was 'every day' right? Do your best and come up with a list showing that frequency. Otherwise people will justifiably think you're just full of shit. ;)

So, yeah, not much here to work with. You know what? Why not just post "Orange Man Real Bad" about a thousand times instead of pretending to argue actual points? It would spare you embarrassment, it might be therapeutic (you need it), and it would actually be a better argument than you've had so far.

Anonymous said...

^^^^I see Fox News has provided your talking points for the day.

Good luck with that. I would prefer to see Trump voted out office come next year, but looking at the way things are going, he's toast. Get over it and concentrate on finding someone other than Pence to head the ticket next year.

Anonymous said...

Nah. I mean, I get it. You see anything that isn't crazily anti-Trump as dictated by Fox news, when you're taking it hook, line, and sinker from the constantly-retracting leftist outlets. Once again, broaden your worldview and sample a broad variety of sources. You'll be better off.

If you did, you would see that the Dems are in flames. Hence the nonstop efforts to relitigate the election. You know that Biden's on his way out, Warren is s joke, Sanders is too ill, and no one else in the Dem stable has a shot.

The Ukraine bullshit is already starting to fall off; its Russia Hoax 2.0. Impeachment is not popular with anyone but wokesters but hey, good luck! We'll see how Pelosi handles it. Since Biden is on video boasting about doing what you're accusing Trump of doing, he's gonna be gently ushered offstage.

In the meantime, you're the party of transgender bathrooms and free healthcare for illegals. Yikes! :)

Anonymous said...

OK. Live a life of delusion if you want to.