Tuesday, May 21, 2019

Kansas City Northeast State Rep. Ingrid Burnett Against Missouri Abortion Ban



Amid an overflow of reaction, this note stands out:

Rep. Ingrid Burnett, D-Kansas City: "Forcing women and girls to carry to term pregnancies that they did not assent to in cases of rape or incest; pregnancies that are medically complicated and beyond saving; and threatening women and their health care professionals with 6 - 8 years of prison for utilizing the doctor-patient relationship to base decisions on what the circumstances present is clearly wrong. This is a dark day for Missouri women and their health caregivers."

Via Turner Report

You decide . . .

15 comments:

Anonymous said...

I don’t think the Abortion bill passed the Mo legislature has any penalties at all against the woman who gets an abortion. Not challenging the honorable kngrid Burnett in general on her opposition to the bill, but if she’s going to make a statement of fact it should be accurate.

Anonymous said...

She looks like a clueless idiot.

Anonymous said...


She is blowing this way out of proportion and reading things into it that are not there. This is what liberals do. These are the same people who won't kill an animal for food, and are against guns for protection, but will kill a baby for convenience! Very confused lady!

Anonymous said...

Maybe less women will be sluts and whores because of the new laws.

Anonymous said...

^^^ Sure @9:21, and maybe fish will grow feet ad walk over to your F-150 while you have a beer.

Anonymous said...

What I want to know is what percentage of abortions are done to terminate pregnancies base upon rape or incest? Also if those claims are made, 1) are they substantiated? and 2) is the offender prosecuted? and 3) are those names added to the sex offender registry?
My guesses are:
A) Less than 2% claimed
1) No - because false claim, won't give up the name or description or DNA
2) No. It is not rape if it is consensual.
3) Probably not
Real answer = Straw-man argument.

Another problem = untested rape kits....why?

Anonymous said...

IT'S NOT MURDER IF THE WOMAN GETS PREGNANT BECAUSE OF RAPE. YOU ARE ALL SUCH BIGOTS

Anonymous said...

^^^ Back to your safe space.

Anonymous said...

9:29 Northern Snakehead fish can walk dummy and you could sit in your truck and drink beer and wait for them to walk by and grab them, god you’re an idiot.

Anonymous said...

11:47:

Hey, stupid!
All caps confirms that you are the moron that you appear to be.

And, yes. I am a bigot. Go fuck yourself.

Common Sense said...

"It's not murder if the woman was raped"

So if some ghetto hood kills my grandmother and I then go kill the hoodrat it isn't the crime of murder committed on my part?

Anonymous said...

@ 1147. So lets assume you know a woman who is raped AND becomes pregnant because after all she is a virgin. Then has the baby but decides a few months later this baby is a problem and is the result of a rape, so she kills it. Is it murder then? Why? It is a child because of a rape so according to your post it isn't murder.
Yeah, that's what I thought, you made a stupid comment. We forgive you because you are a child of a rape. We are calling your mom to take care of you now.

Anonymous said...

The utter stupidity of the men commenting here proves why they shouldn't be legislating anything regarding womens health.

They don't know the difference between rape and consent.

They don't know the difference between a baby and an embryo or fetus.

Time for women to take over the legislature. The lawmakers should be the people you refer to here daily as those "dumb cunts".

Anonymous said...

The few women who get pregnant due to incest or rape-rape will have eight weeks to get an abortion. Unknown why that's not enough time to decide.

Anonymous said...

Most sluts are getting fucked by dozens of different men every month. It could easily take more than eight weeks to figure out which one inseminated the slut.