Second Look: Show-Me MAGA Hat Hot Mess Temper Tantrum At Missouri Western

An even better glimpse at debatable college fashions at this 2nd-to-last choice nearby college . . .

MAGA hat disagreement between students, police at Missouri Western garners national attention

A disagreement between an unidentified student wearing a Make America Great Again hat, other students and campus police at Missouri Western State University in St. Joseph was caught on video and is now making national headlines.According to a report from The Griffon News, the incident started around 4:30 p.m.

Comments

  1. Now there's a stalwart individual. The portion where she rants about wearing a turban is priceless.

    Higher education (slightly higher . . . it is Mo Western after all) will prove very beneficial in her future career as a US Senator.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think the sad thing is that some portion of the population has been brainwashed as a part of a political narrative that anyone showing support of our current president is an OVERT RACIST and they have the right to accost, insult, and threaten them.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I got an idea mind your own business. If your saying that hat is killing your people look in the mirror. Your people are killing your people. There is a huge problem here. What if a white person told a black person i dont want you to wear FUBU because i think it raises racial divide. Then the white person would be racist. Its a hat supporting our president and his beliefs. Like them or not its just a hat. In 2 years if another person wins there will be more hats but its still just a hat

    ReplyDelete
  4. "Only real thing killing blacks in huge numbers is other blacks." That's a statement you never ever hear a black person say. But a white man in a MAGA hat is who they blame instead. That right there proves how stupid and narrow minded black people really are.

    ReplyDelete
  5. It's amazing the level of denial by Trump supporters. Not all are racist but Trump and the high majority of his cabinet have obvious racial issues.
    Outside of the Hillary email mumbo jumbo, Trump ran his campaign on getting rid of Muslims with the idea that all are black and extremist. And for the last year it has basically been a war on Latinos with the idea that all are illegal immigrants in gangs and dealing drugs. Latinos do the work no one else in this country will do and they do it for cheap due to little to no opportunity for them south of the border. People seem to either not know or try to forget that we receive crops and other imported goods from Mexico that American farmers cannot grow in certain seasons. The pressure will be on white American farmers to do the impossible if the ridiculous wall is built and border shutdown.

    "Only real thing killing blacks in huge numbers is other blacks." Ok, and "Only real thing killing whites in huge numbers are other whites. Most if not ALL mass shooters have been white with the majority of their victims being white." That's a statement you never ever hear a white person say, except for me. But other races of people offended by people in a MAGA hat are the ones to be considered stupid and narrow minded. That right there proves how stupid and narrow minded most Trump supporting people really are. Ironically, just about every policy Trump intends to implement will impact us as white Americans more than it will blacks and latinos. Lack of more strict gun laws will result in more mass shootings by WHITE mass shooters. Blacks can barely purchase everyday items from stores without complications, and although they might do more damage in their own neighborhoods whites are in the higher percentile of legal, illegally owned and inherited guns. I would be more afraid of white mass shooters killing us in large numbers than a black guy shooting in his own neighborhood. I can avoid his neighborhood but I cannot avoid an angry MAGA supporting douche at work, in my neighborhood or in a public venue.

    Some of you inbred rednecks really need to leave your Podunk backwoods once in a while and see the rest of the world. Total ignorance.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. KKK FROM RAYTOWN4/2/19, 3:11 PM

      Josh, you bun wearing snowflake. Wake the fuck up before one of your negro friends shows you the real world of racism. I'm glad you received your student loans education so you can spell and use grammar correctly. Its to bad that nigers can't do the same.

      Delete
  6. Byron Funkhouser4/2/19, 11:35 AM

    Well spoken, Josh.

    I am more likely to be randomly killed by an angry white man than a black or brown man, or any woman.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you, but we would all be more likely to be randomly shot by an angry white man at a public venue than by a black or brown man. I am not afraid of being shot by an angry black man because I would not move to a poor area full of violence and drugs where the likelihood of that would increase. Yet, I am always at risk of being shot dead by an angry white man at any given time wherever I go. It is a fact that I am not afraid to accept and admit.

      As men, the probability is higher to be killed by the wife or woman at home. Haha

      Delete
  7. I don't understand why josh is against gay rights and the LGBT community. Muslim immigrants in this country slaughtered 50 homosexuals in Orlando and countless others...THEN josh goes on saying he wants to import more muslims from countries where they throw homosexuals off buildings merely for being gay. Muslims are at direct odds with the LGBT community and people like josh perpetuate this hatred.

    The islamic Brunei just announced they will be stoning gays...in 2019! https://www.cnn.com/2019/04/02/asia/brunei-lgbt-inhumane-stoning-laws-intl/index.html

    In addition, the muslims in England have protested the acknowledgement of homosexuals

    https://www.theguardian.com/education/2019/mar/04/birmingham-school-stops-lgbt-lessons-after-parent-protests

    Yet josh wants to continue putting the LGBT community in danger

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Of course you do not understand something that you have clearly fabricated in your screwy micro-mind.

      What you say is also false! It was only 49 killed in Orlando, and that still was not the biggest mass shooting and killing in history. More were killed by white shooters and that is an indisputable and undeniable fact. No amount of Trump loving, race baiting, homophobic propaganda being spewed will change that.

      The Orlando shooter was a closeted homosexual, so HE was the one with issues with LGBT rights. It's strange how that shooting was your first thought and go-to example. Many Psychology 101 theories would explain that your reason for this is that you either also have issues with gay rights or you are also a homosexual-in the closet, of course, suffering from issues of self acceptance. I have no issue with it and hope that you opt out of formulating a mass shooting or suicide, and decide to come out to your family and friends. I mean, if you have not done so already.

      Anyhow, your share and opening up to the blog community is appreciated. It still does not negate the fact that the majority of mass shooters in American history are STILL and will ALWAYS be white. Also, Sorry to educate you on this but being Muslim and Jewish are religions, not a race, just as considering yourself a Christian or Catholic does not mean you are white. People of all colors practice religion. And regardless of how much blacks kill each other at an alarming rate in their own communities, they would not be here if we did bring them here. FYI, they will never kill as many of themselves as we white men and women have during times of slavery. Another fact that is hard for the typical Fox News watching bigots to swallow.

      Links are awesome, here are some for you, buddy.

      Mass shooters in the US by race:

      https://www.statista.com/statistics/476456/mass-shootings-in-the-us-by-shooter-s-race/

      Links are awesome :

      https://www-m.cnn.com/2013/09/16/us/20-deadliest-mass-shootings-in-u-s-history-fast-facts/index.html

      Don't be angry at the stats, and don't remain angry and in denial of history, just consider and practice acceptance before you attend your next Trump rally. The real hatred is perpetrated by you and bred by those like you. Put down the moonshine and pick up a book.

      Delete
  8. Josh you ignorant slut.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That is a compliment coming from someone whom probably engages in animal sex and wore a MAGA hat as he impregnated his sister in his backwoods trailer.

      Thanks, pal.

      Delete
  9. B'lie'RON is Josh! What a racist fraudster! That post is all too wordy.

    "I hate Whiteys!" --- Signed, Phony Funky. There, fixed it for ya, faker!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I am not sure what a B'lie'RON is, but it does not sound pleasant. Based on your last sentence I will assume it some form of racial labeling nonsense? That is hilarious!

      You are proving those offended by MAGA hats correct by naturally assuming other "whiteys" whom are not racist or bigots have to be black or liberal Hillary supporters. Not all of us are ignorant race baiting scumbags, like yourself. I am white and love it. Perhaps one day you will learn acceptance and stop playing the victim. Get educated!

      Delete
  10. @11:54

    The Orlando shooter was a closeted homosexual, so HE was the one with issues with LGBT rights. It's strange how that shooting was your first thought and go-to example. Many Psychology 101 theories would explain that your reason for this is that you either also have issues with gay rights or you are also a homosexual. I have no issue with it and hope that you opt out of formulating a mass shooting or suicide, and decide to come out to your family and friends. I mean, if you have not done so already.

    Anyhow, your share and opening up to the blog community is appreciated. It still does not negate the fact that the majority of mass shooters in American history are STILL and will ALWAYS be white. Also, Sorry to educate you on this but being Muslim and Jewish are religions, not a race, just as considering yourself a Christian or Catholic does not mean you are white. And regardless of how much blacks kill each other at an alarming rate in their own communities, they would not believe here if we did bring them here. FYI, they will never kill as many of themselves as we white men and women have during times of slavery.

    Links are awesome, he are some for you, buddy.

    Mass shooters in the US by race:

    https://www.statista.com/statistics/476456/mass-shootings-in-the-us-by-shooter-s-race/

    Links are awesome :

    https://www-m.cnn.com/2013/09/16/us/20-deadliest-mass-shootings-in-u-s-history-fast-facts/index.html

    Don't be angry at the stats, and don't remain angry and in denial of history, just consider and practice acceptance before you attend your next Trump rally.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Josh is far from the sharpest tool in the shed, I see.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Considering that the proper usage of the phrase is "sharpest knife in the drawer", you just disqualified yourself, bucko!

      Typical idiot.

      Delete
    2. No he said it correct. Its just you have never probably worked a hard day in your life.

      Delete
    3. No, he did not say it correctly - not 'correct'-. But if that makes you feel better as you jerk yourself off to the voices in your head and waste away in mommy's basement, then have at it, kiddo.

      Delete
    4. so your a grammer idiot. Im no kid but i would surely compare net worths with you. But your prbably not worth the shit that comes out of your pie hole fuckhead

      Delete
    5. @3:04
      The word is "grammar", so you should probably glance in the nearest mirror to view the idiot you referenced.

      BTW, Your "net worth" is more than likely in my pocket, kid.

      Delete
  12. Josh,
    I know it’s easy to espouse liberal agendas when you’re young and still looking at the world through rose-colored glasses, but there’s a good chance your opinions will change as you mature. Additionally, you lose credibility when you attack factors such as your opponents’ lifestyles, living conditions, etc. The topic of this thread was an incident over a MAGA hat. Only silly, triggered liberals are to blame for such nonsense. I (along with many people) couldn’t stand Obama, but I never felt compelled to confront anyone wearing “Hope and Change” merchandise.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I know it’s easy to dismiss what is staring you in the face, and do the typical Trump deflection tactics  (considering any opinions which differ from your own as "liberal agendas"). When you have gotten drunk off of propaganda laced kool-aid, it will be a struggle for you to return to sobriety in reality. This sort of behavior is part of what triggers disturbing results. Just because someone does not support Trump (whom is not a true Republican nor conservative) does not mean that someone is a liberal or Democrat. That is quite the narrow view you are looking through. 

      I do not look at the world "through rose-colored glasses". I have travelled the world, seen the worst of it in other countries as well as my own (America) as a U.S. Marine, survived my three tours, and returned home to further my education all before hitting the age of forty. I do not sit around all day following tweets on social media and feeding into the ridiculousness of FOX "news" and MSNBC. I am very capable of developing my own ideas and pride myself on independent thinking.  Your view would be more valid if I were an inexperienced youngster and spewing opinions based on media rhetoric and propaganda. However, as you previously stated: there’s a good chance your opinions will change as you mature. I hope that yours do!

      Additionally, YOU lose credibility when you attempt to overlook the kind of attack factors used by those you refer to my "opponents", and try to make it appear as if they are my own. Just as you cleverly attempted to "attack" me as a liberal just because my opinions are different than those of Trump supporters. It is the same "with me or you are the enemy" mentality and tactic used by soldiers in Nazi Germany. If one is not in agreement or following Hitler then they are the enemy? No!
      I do admit that response to such silliness could have been different, however, I do not apologize for responding to it without being overly offensive.  If you can overlook ones reply to me that includes "attacks", and focus solely on my response to them, then your argument lost validity. 

      Delete
    2. Indeed, the topic of this thread was an incident over a MAGA hat, and I commented on it. Your response and mentioning of "liberals" and such proves one and/or a few of my earlier points. As I said earlier, Not all Trump supporters are racists or bigots, but Trumps campaign was run on bigoted, discriminating ideas catering to a certain kind of thinking. I can understand why certain people would be upset about the wearing of the MAGA hat and merchandise (because of what it represents, and what Trump's campaign clearly translated that it represents). I do not agree with how some people  (including the young woman in this video) reacted to it, but I understand why she did.  

      When those of us who pay attention to the rantings of the average Trump supporter, and how they go on about "snowflake" this and "liberal" that, it further provides examples of the division in this country. You like to throw politics into the equation, but Trump is not and never has been a true conservative. Oddly, his fanbase gets behind him as he attacks REAL conservatives, dead and alive. He was not lying  (during his campaign) when stating that he hoped to face off against Hillary in the end because he had dirt on her. It was not the emails; the same thing those in his family and on his staff are also in question of doing. I am glad that you never felt compelled to confront anyone wearing “Hope and Change” merchandise, neither did I.

      Like yourself, (along with many people) I also could not stand Obama, but Obama merchandise and Trump merchandise have less to do with the issue. To his credit, Obama did not campaign with attacks on race, gender, and religion; Trump did, and unfortunately his campaign has yet to stop, even after winning the election. If you visit Donald Trump social media pages and claim to not see the nonstop childish race baiting, insults targeting other races, religions, countries, etc (coming from the man himself), then you contain some of the denial that I mentioned previously, and I will no longer entertain you with debate time. 
      Had Obama campaigned on "Hope and Change", said everyone who is not a black or biracial Christian must go, we should build a wall to keep Canadians out because they are white, coming into our country illegally, raping, killing, trafficking drugs, and destroying our economy? I would see a valid point and credibility in your argument and I would be saying the exact same thing about Obama. Yet, Obama did not do any of those things or anything remotely close to it. 

      Delete
  13. Josh makes a comment and 6 minutes later Byron likes it.

    What's wrong with that picture?

    Everything!

    Josh is Byron end of story

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It must be miserable to be you. A lot of your time has been spent on the computer, huh? You come across as the kind of guy to browse the internet night and day, and without the intellect to formulate and/or contribute anything knowledgeable to a debate, you resort to "hey, this guy said 'thee' instead of 'the'. I have only witnessed one person type that... they must totally be the same person". It's sad! When in a room with others, (in your case) it would be best to simply remain silent.

      Delete
    2. Oh yeah, END OF STORY!!

      Delete
  14. 2:29, your stats tell us nothing we should not have known already. Of course whites would constitute the majority of i.a. mass shooters, because whites are by far the largest racial demographic in the country. On a proportional basis, the country is roughly 72% white and 14% black. Your link shows that there have been 107 mass shootings since 1982 (I did not look up how it defines mass shooting, but assume it's reasonable). Sixty of those were committed by whites, or just under 56%. Seventeen were committed by blacks, or 16% (both percentages rounded to nearest whole integer).

    So, on a proportional basis, whites committed fewer mass shootings than blacks.

    Since you're in a statistical mood, now show us the proportions of violent crimes committed by whites and blacks. I don't think there is any way even you can massage those numbers.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. KKK FROM RAYTOWN4/2/19, 3:16 PM

      As the negroes say, Josh got the fuck knocked out.

      Delete
  15. Yep, Josh is a dummy. One of those dummies who really, really wants you to know it, too.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Wow, adderall has been good to josh today

    ReplyDelete
  17. Josh is probably Byron’s favorite goat to shag and now he’s filled the poor critter’s head with his keyboard diarrhea.

    ReplyDelete
  18. @3:11


    Yes, of course whites would constitute the majority of mass shooters, and yes, whites are by far the largest racial demographic in the country. But according to your average Trump supporter and FOX "news" viewer, the majority of mass shooters are black, and whites are in the minority. Hence, the statement made by the typical white nationalist and supremacist "we are losing our country", and the latching onto MAGA in hopes to Make America Great Again (?) by making it more white.

    If you did not look up how it defines mass shooting, then you should research it before attempting to have a discussion. Your questions may already be answered for you. If you are too lazy to do so, why should I do any research FOR you and provide you with what you can find on your own?

    Since you're in a statistical mood and creating numbers based on your own theory, YOU do some research and show us the proportions of violent crimes committed by whites and blacks. YOU research on mass shootings based on demographics, race, gender, etc. Provide us with links and data, now! 
    I agree, I do not think there is any way you can massage those numbers, but I welcome you to try. We will be waiting for you, pal.

    Without conducting any research to support your self created analytical data, your "on a proportional basis, whites committed fewer mass shootings than blacks" has no credibility and absolutely unfounded fabrication. I mean, you did admit to not even completely reading what has already been provided to you. So, until you do, Thank you, and I agree that my provided stats tell us nothing we should not have known already. 


    @3:16

    Your cheerleading and lame s/n with the purpose and intent to create shock value, trigger offensive feeling, and angry response from exposes you for what you truly are. Step outside when your homework is done, junior, and perhaps the other neighborhood kids will show you how to be as courageous as your s/n indicates your wish is to become.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Ha! This Josh character comments about some other poster spending a lot of time online, yet he has been pontificating on here all day with drivel that would rival the length of “War and Peace.” Crazy on a ship of fools.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If you consider spending a total of approximately 38 minutes (an average of 1 to 5 minutes per reply) as "all day" then your life must be very inactive.

      Delete
  20. Mercifully, Josh is too stupid to know how stupid he is. He's lucky that way.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If you consider spending a total of approximately 38 minutes (an average of 1 to 5 minutes per reply) as "all day" then your life must be very inactive.

      I am genius when compared to your average Trump supporter whom blindly follows the president (in a mindless zombie-like state) as he tells them he is "Making America Great Again (?)" while simultaneously walking them off of a cliff into another depression. A recession will come first within the next year or so, and a depression most definitely if Trump is reelected in 2020. Considering the weak level of Democrats lining up to challenge thus far, a second term, recession, and depression are all highly likely.

      Delete
  21. What a dumbass negress. She was either looking for 15 minutes of fame, some fast cash or both.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Really like Josh's comments on this, they seem reasonable. Thank you!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

TKC COMMENT POLICY:

Be percipient, be nice. Don't be a spammer. BE WELL!!!

- The Management