Saturday, December 22, 2018

TKC READER: KANSAS CITY STAR WRONG TO DISCRIMINATE AGAINST WHITE GUYS!!!



While we may not agree with everything this TKC Reader notes, it's worth checking as a bit of counter-programing.

The reaction is to this week's race-based policy screed . . .

"Another white guy appointed to statewide office in Missouri? C’mon, Gov. Parson"

Here's the alternative take . . .

TKC READER AGAINST KANSAS CITY STAR QUOTAS

The Kansas City Star Editorial Board (4 White Males, 2 White Females, 1 Black Male) does hereby announce that they are PRIMA DONNA HYPOCRITES and secretly hate themselves for what they've become.

Just days following the Star discovering that Kansas U.S. Senator Pat Roberts is 82-years old, this racist editorial board is chastising Missouri Governor Parson for appointing "by most accounts… a well-qualified" candidate. So what's the problem with this appointee? Well, you see, he's a white man! And despite the fact that The Kansas City Star Editorial Board is itself composed of some 86-percent white members, you the reader are not supposed to question that GLARING DISCREPANCY. "Think as you're told, not as the editorial board practices." Because The Kansas City Star is a Liberal Democrat propaganda machine, Senator Roberts qualifies as an "old white male" and Scott Fitzpatrick (the MO House Budget Chairman) is a "non-diverse white male" of innate suspicious character, thus they are both prime fodder for The Kansas City Star's targeted discrimination, derision, and diatribes of derangement.

In what psychologists describe as redirected self-hatred, the Star commits self-flagellation in their flagrant bias against white males. As a polite reminder to all, Pat Roberts is the senior United States Senator from Kansas because the citizens of our great state elected him to the position. Likewise in Missouri, Mr. Fitzpatrick was duly elected to the Missouri House by his constituents. That The Kansas City Star hates the democratic process, should not come as a shocker to anyone familiar with their hyper-partisan Democratic Party propaganda efforts.

Specifically on age discrimination, is it particularly peculiar that The Kansas City Star who's decimated their own senior staff with repetitive rounds of layoffs, would call for Roberts forced retirement due to age alone? No, instead it's par for the McClatchy course. But while the McClatchy newspaper chain has been forced to self-exterminate due to years of financial mismanagement and out-of-touch relations with their audience, Star writers would slide Senator Roberts into the rocking chair based solely upon his seniority. If this were a legal case, the Star has been caught on video confessing to premeditated discrimination.

Now, if Senator Roberts at age 82, should be exiled from the U.S. Senate, then surely Star writers have been calling for similar action in regards to their own Democrat darlings. Let's take a look at a few:

Senator Dianne Feinstein -- age 85, employed a Chinese communist spy on her staff for decades.
Senator Patrick Leahy -- age 78
Senator Bernie Sanders -- age 77, a likely presidential candidate in 2020.
Representative Maxine Waters -- age 80, prone to outbursts and calls for directed violence.
Soon-to-be House Majority Leader Nancy Pelosi -- age 78
Former V.P. and Senator Joe Biden -- age 76, potential 2020 presidential candidate a

The Star's Bryan Lowry may wish to review this excerpt from an October 2017 CNN Politics article:

Members of both parties in Congress are at their oldest average age in decades, but the average Democrat has about four years on the average Republican on Capitol Hill.

The average Democrat was 61.0 years old at the start of this term, the highest average age for Democrats on the Hill in available data stretching back to 1947, compiled thanks to a great piece by 538, plus recent numbers from the @unitedstates project, an Internet-driven repository featuring data from the Sunlight Foundation, GovTrack.us and the New York Times.

The average Republican was 57.2 years old. The gap between the two parties has been roughly four years since the 2010 tea party wave. For two decades before that, Democrats tended to be about one year older than Republicans, on average.

---

So, once again, The Kansas City Star has been caught violating the principles of common sense, decency, and journalistic integrity. Just as an ailing patient who's tethered to an oxygen tank should refrain from smoking, a writer lingering in newspaper hospice should refrain from throwing ink at innocent white men because of their skin color.
############

You decide  . . . 

27 comments:

Anonymous said...

The Kansas City Star is has been media and writers.

Anonymous said...

The quota mentality is the worst kind of forced diversity, putting pragmatic considerations such as job skill aside in favor of an infantile numbers game that is motivated only by identity politics.

Anonymous said...

They really are that stupid after all! Hahahahaha!

Anonymous said...

I’m sure when we find an intelligent Uncle Tom..........

Anonymous said...

Nobody should expect anything from the Star other than their current narrative. Bias at its best.

Anonymous said...

So chuck (white males average 96.835 years) sent you another rant before his double shot of Geritol? Goody goody goody.

Anonymous said...

The KC Star is trash

Anonymous said...

Apparently 7:16 is trashed, little early to be hammered on colt 45’s don’t you think?

Anonymous said...

Unfortunately this piece is only half of the story. It's not only a war on white men, it's a war on men period. Look at the press and support the democrat pushed #METOO movement gets every time a woman stubs her toe. Look at how Maxine Waters and the Hollywood left women get 24/7 press coverage to complain about how they have been mistreated and threaten violence with immunity.
I still don't understand why a man can't just have a conversation with a woman anymore without watching every word. But women, Black, White, Brown and Yellow can drop the F-Bomb all day long, can pose naked in ads, can enact a sex act in a movie to earn millions of dollars and not be called a tramp or prostitute.
This is all because of the democrat party pushing the courts to punish men because most real men are republicans.

Anonymous said...

^^^ amen brother

Anonymous said...

Works every time.

Anonymous said...

The Soviets hardly had a Chairman over 70.

Anonymous said...

The Star should be urging Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg to retire, she is 85 years old and having health problems.

Anonymous said...

TOP PHOTO -- SHATTERED OR SHUTTERED?

Those who print lies in glass houses will be exposed as transparent propagandists!!!

Anonymous said...

Everyone knows the Star’s death is imminent, sadly it’s just in the lingering phase. Someone show some mercy and pull the plug!

Anonymous said...

Poor pitiful Tony. It's been sixteen years since The Star didn't hire him and yet the bitter tears flow like he's Al Green.

Sad!!!>

CRYING KRAPSKEY HAS NO ROOM TO CALL ANYONE PITIFUL! SICKENING!!! said...

He's too good for that raggedy fishwrap. Oh,and how'd it go with your crusade to have the Nichol's fountain renamed?

Night Shift KC said...

Always find it weird that star writers think Tony wanted a job anywhere. I think you're overestimating the Blogger I know he's got you scared and everything but come on man. A blogger looking for a job? That's just as unbelievable as most of the political "news" they offer. LOL!

Anonymous said...

The Star is pathetic in its thinking.
Look what ex employees at their FB page (include the word scribe in your search) say and think.
Their left-wing-green-liberal/slant-Volving-driving-Pelosi-Biden-Schumer-worshipping-SNL-loving-bleeding-hearts thinking make St. Al Sharoton look conservative.
Yes read their FB page and see how their snarky comments expose their thinking and you will see how Karma works to include their leaders in helping align their implosion and demise and how they will blame everyone (including past leadership) for their demise while forgetting the true reason for media demise is in their bathrooms in the form of a simple mirror.

Anonymous said...

Like many, I stopped reading The Star long ago- not because of their leftist rant but there was no depth or originality in what was printed. I read this editorial by unnamed author and was reminded what lazy journalism truly is. This lacked original thought and was written as a filler. In other words, a headline looking for a story. Hypocrisy aside - asking member of the Black Missouri Caucus for quotes, which, surprise! wanted someone of color , qualifications be damned, - how about just a little effort? Like most, I am ok reading opposing viewpoints , but at least have a point and put some effort

Anonymous said...

I only read it occasionally at the library to see if someone I know has died. Death doesn't discriminate

Anonymous said...

It took a long time, but now most people understand that getting hired by a news outlet does not mean the hiree is a deep thinker. The opposite is closer to the truth.

Anonymous said...

The only unbiased section of the Red Star is the obituaries.

Anonymous said...

Any of the 7 Liberals which constitute the editorial board could have authored this extremely bad editorial, as they live in an echo chamber where group-think permeates their core being.

I love the fact that their HYPOCRISY was highlighted. 6 of 7 members are White, yet they feel the need to hector Gov. Parson for selecting the best-qualified candidate.

C'mon KC Star editorial board, fire your 6 White members, and replace them with:

1 Black female
2 Hispanics (1 male + 1 female)
1 Transgender activist who uses the pseudonym "Dick B. Gone"
1 Native American Lesbian who beats women for sport (oh wait, she already got a new job)
1 Token White male who lives under an I-70 overpass, begs for money on the corner, and specializes in editorials lambasting the elite white patriarchal newspaper corporation which downsized him out of employment.

Anonymous said...

One can see one of the op-Ed members is deeply offended by all this talk.
They think it is unfair they have any critics... as the board are very deep thinkers and know what is best for all.
They know they are deep thinkers as they are told this by others... like their mommies and daddies.
They know what is best because they are mostly white - survived The prior bitch publisher- and can criticize whites to make up for being white.
As the stock tanks and many short their stock and op-Ed snarky comments continue- some hope they continue to put reporters in op-ed roles to continue alienating readers and causing cancellations of subscribers who must deal with off-shores customer service.
What a great business plan!

Anonymous said...

The Star needs to work on getting some content. I almost bought one today at the Dollar Tree, and the Sunday edition was as small as the Saturday editions used to be. Not worth a dollar, let alone the posted price, whatever that is.

Anonymous said...

I hate that cracker William Rockhill Nelson