Check this scathing indictment released today from a Kansas City lady concern . . .
RFT: Missouri Women Are Totally Underrepresented in Politics
Here's why we note the former Senator . . .
"It's also worth mentioning: With the loss suffered by U.S. Senator Claire McCaskill (D-Missouri), the state has lost one of its highest profile women representatives. And while the state attorney general's seat opened as a result, Governor Mike Parson swiftly replaced one white male with another, appointing state Treasurer Eric Schmitt to the position. "
Actually, the study FROM THE KANSAS CITY WOMEN'S FOUNDATION drills down to the local level and blames us all for the horrible haircuts of Hillary Shields . . .
"Nicole Galloway is now MISSOURI's only female statewide elected officeholder, and women will still hold just a quarter of state legislative seats. Closing this gap is vital for our government to represent the diversity – and interests – of the communities it serves. Through our Appointments Project the Women’s Foundation is committed to building a pipeline of women leaders with the skills and experience needed to finally end the era of underrepresentation and close the leadership gap for good.”
"In Missouri, there were a total of 118 women running in state, federal and judicial races in 2018. Sixty-one, or 53 percent, of those candidates won their respective races. In Kansas, there were 75 women candidates for those offices, 32 of which won their elections. The gender makeup of the Missouri and Kansas state legislatures will also remain largely static, with the percentage of women in the Missouri General Assembly ticking up from 22.8 percent to 25.4 percent, and the percentage of women in the Kansas Legislatures declining from 28.4 percent to 26.5 percent."
You decide . . .
Actually, this is very important and that's why Sharice and Laura Kelly winning in Kansas was so crucial. Women can win their races but not when the opposition uses sexism as part of their camapign.
ReplyDeletethe granny beat Kobach, that is what's important.
ReplyDelete^^^^^^^^^ So stupid. The Democratic Party campaigned dirty, that is why he lost.
ReplyDelete4:56 dont act like a lefty. We lost fair and square. Now do what republicans do. Don't bitch don't blame, pick our asses up dust them off and try harder next time.
ReplyDeleteI am old fashion I have never been friends with a women I did want to screw. After I got married I can ignore their dumb asses.
ReplyDeleteThe identity politics shit has got to stop. Voting for a woman because she is a woman is just as sexist as not voting for a woman because she is a woman.
ReplyDeleteAmen, Cee Bee! Why is voting for someone based on their ability such a bizarre concept? Instead it’s because someone is male/female/gay/trans/non-white, etc. What ignorant grounds on which to base a vote.
DeleteLook Hawley is more feminine that McCaskill
ReplyDelete^^^I have to agree with that one! Air Claire is very manly!
ReplyDeleteContrary to popular belief, this is a free country. If these hags really believe they're underrepresented they are free to run for office themselves as well as free to give their vote and money to the candidate of their choice.
ReplyDeleteI suspect however that this is less a complaint about under representation of women and more about a bunch of bitchy leftist hags bitching about the fact that their un-electable bitchy leftist hag candidate didn't win due to the fact that she's an un-electable bitchy leftist hag.
ReplyDeleteClaire couldn't be more wrong, I didn't vote for her not because I'm underrepresented, but because she was saying one thing and caught saying another, it was straight from the horses mouth.....hers. I don't agree with her policies and after the way the democrats acted when Trump was elected I will never vote for one again. You want to see underrepresented? Take a look at Hollywood women!
Democrats have just gone way out there and I don't want any part of their nasty ways or their socialist agenda.
And they think Trump hates women?????
More howling from the melting snowflakes or in this case, nasty old ice queen.
ReplyDeletePeople are stupid. If there is a quality female candidate in Missouri to run then they should run. No man is oppressing women from running.
ReplyDeleteHave they considered the likelihood that out of 118 women running in Missouri elections, that about 115 of them were stupid cunts? They had so many stupid cunts running, it was ridiculous.
ReplyDeleteBased on the comments I read here I believe it would be a winnable case against "Women Vote PAC" and "Emily's List" as they fund only candidates of the female gender. NO men represented at all. Now that is sexist and I think Yoder should sue to get equal monetary support. If it isn't illegal for women to do this then why would it be illegal if men did it next election? Goose/Gander thing?
ReplyDeleteNote to KC Women's Foundation:
ReplyDeletePlease move over to Kansas, where you'd enjoy a 3-for-1 special in Sharice Davids.
Female
Lesbian
Native American
KC Women's Foundation flops with faulty logic! They argue for equality of outcome, while disregarding vital input data. These are the people who say that because women comprise 50-percent of the population, women should hold 50-percent of the positions at the KCPD, KCFD, KC Chiefs, Royals, Catholic priesthood, etc.
A little off of subject, but a question for all of you (And I know you are still here, reading now...) Fascist Progressives who were just SO SURE Trump was "colluding" with the Russians.
ReplyDeleteWhen is Trump going to jail for Russian Collusion?
You look like idiots. The media lied and lied and lied (They are even worse if that is possible.) and you bought in and you still do.
Albert Einstein once said, mans intelligence is limited but his stupidity is infinite.
ReplyDeleteSHOULD READ
Albert Einstein once said, WOMEN'S intelligence is limited but THEIR stupidity is infinite.
JUST MORE FEMINIST BS.