OR . . . Show-Me The "No-win Supreme" decision awaiting the embattled Missouri Senator.
Read more:
Read more:
McCaskill under pressure from both sides of the aisle as she considers Supreme Court vote
U.S. Sen. Claire McCaskill says she has a growing list of questions as she preps for her meeting next week with Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh. And most of them won't deal with his position on abortion rights, a top concern of progressive groups.
The biggest questions MacAskill asked herself everyday is how can I keep my fat ugly ass relevant, and stay out of jail.
ReplyDeleteMcCaskill
ReplyDeleteLies
Konsistently
too late. she can't become a moderate two months before the election.
ReplyDeleteshe voted against gorsuch and supported obama in everything. not missouri!
Vote no on the pick. It's the right thing to do. As the repubs said when Obama was in office, it's too close to an election to vote for a Supreme Court pick. We should wait until after the election.
ReplyDeleteNonsense.
DeleteBull Shit!
Delete7:41 must enjoy sniffing Ruth Bader's thongs..
DeleteWhen you don't even know the difference between a presidential election in midterms it makes for a difficult life. Maybe that pre k funding isn't such a bad idea after all...
ReplyDeleteVote that Turd Ferguson down! America needs more abortion. Not less.
ReplyDeleteBring back Merrick Garland. We need a balanced court.
^^^^It doesn't fucking matter if it was a midterm or a presidential election you dumb motherfucker. The point was there was no fucking precedent to deny a president's supreme court pick for either. Or, are you such a stupid fucking goon, you failed to grasp that? Don't answer pants-shitter, we already know.
ReplyDelete9:45, are you referring to the Biden Rule? That applied to presidential elections, not mid-terms. Maybe soon you'll be able to cite the Pelosi Rule in support of your notion that it should apply to mid-terms as well, if she can connect with reality for long enough to say it.
ReplyDelete