TKC BREAKING NEWS!!! INSIDERS QUESTION EDGEMOOR COPYCAT OF BURNS & MAC KANSAS CITY NEW AIRPORT DESIGN!!!
Nearly one billion dollars doesn't buy original ideas for the new Kansas City airport.
Accordingly . . .
THE FIRST LOOK AT KANSAS CITY NEW SINGLE-TERMINAL AIRPORT DESIGN REVEALS A STRIKING SIMILARITY TO BURNS & MAC RENDERINGS!!!
The similarities are striking to the Corgan design - Commissioned by Burns & Mac and complaints are already starting to surface against this lack of originality with big money on the line.
Like it or not, this could be part of an upcoming complaint that locals are expecting a KC corporation to file against City Hall in the aftermath of a controversial and contentious selection process.
Developing . . .
A no vote in November would solve all of this controversy!
ReplyDeleteBoth pics look like modern art assholes to me. Either will do for KC
ReplyDeleteJust vote no
ReplyDeleteLack of design is right. The crooks going to charge 1 billion for a 250 million project.
ReplyDeleteEdgmoor,has a real problem THE K.C.MO.VOTERS ARE SMARTER THEN THE AVERAGE POLITICIANS. THERE IS NO MORE PULLING THE WOOL OVER EVERYBODY'S EYES. ..THE BEST THING ABOUT THE VOTE IS THE ONES THAT SUPPORT THE SINGLE TERMINAL AIRPORT LIVES OUTSIDE OF K.C.MO.ALL THE OUTSIDE MONEY COMING IN FOR ADVERTISING.
ReplyDeleteThe B&M design was pretty identical to the original renderings from the Van Loh era as well.
ReplyDeleteGOLLY WOW!!! LEAPIN' LIZARDS!!! I'D CALL THE FBI!!!
ReplyDeleteWho cares. The Norks are preparing a launch they say can hit the west coast of North America. On October 9 (Monday)
ReplyDeleteGet out your popcorn
they have in common vagueness and subtle artistic qualities to appeal to viewers' emotions.
ReplyDeleteneither is detailed or concrete enough to have much informational content.
If the pic on the right has water coming down into a pool then it will make everyone want to go potty.
ReplyDeleteWomen especially if they hear running water always have to go to the bathroom shortly after.
You TKC clowns are solid fools. KC voters are predominately black. Most have NEVER been to the airport. WhyTF would they vote for a NEW airport. Not happening without a ballot stuff by SLYvestor and the nail tech.....Sexy Cindy.
ReplyDelete^^^ Stay in Johnson County Paul. You'll be happier.
ReplyDeletevote no!
ReplyDeleteOF COURSE THE RENDERS ARE COPIES!
ReplyDeleteSAARINEN DESIGNED THIS AIROORT IN 1962,
AND DEVELOPERS ALL OVER THE COUNTRY HAVE BEE PLAGERIZING HIS IDEAS EVER SINCE!
IF YOU'VE EVER FLOWN ANYWHERE YOU'VE LANDED AT THIS AIRPORT, AND YOU'VE EXPERIENCED EVERY ONE OF ITS OUTDAYED FLAWS IN EXCRUCIATING DETAIL!
NONE OF THESE JACKASSES HAVE ANY ORIGINALITY OR CREATIVITY,
THEY ARE MERELY COPYING COPIES OF COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL!
THE ONLY "MIRACLE" IS THAT THE ORIGINAL DESIGN FOR KCI WAS DIFFERENT,
AND ITS CONVENIENCE HAS BEEN SHAMING THESE SORTS OF "DESIGNERS"
EVER SINCE IT WAS COMPLETED!
KCI is convenient.
ReplyDeletesave it.
but remodel the obvious shortcomings, such as the bathroom shortage engineered by the crony establishment looking for profits in an unnecessary new terminal.
TWA Idlewild 1962.
ReplyDeleteThat is beautiful. I agree with Kraske it is "Real Kool" Can we get two of them. It will take two in order for us to have as many bays as we have right now. We going to build a pretty airport that is smaller!
ReplyDeletea series of deconstructed quonset huts with a price tag of 1 billion. BRANDING PROBLEM. They'll be a series of flags rotated over the course of the year: union station flags, crown center, plaza flags. It will be really neat and fun for 2 months.
ReplyDelete"We going to build a pretty airport that is smaller!" that must be jolie justice herself. alliterations are known to help one's careers.
ReplyDeleteDon't believe for a minute the rumor that the airlines will pony up the cash for the airport. I want to hear the airline reps (all of them, not just Southwest) say the words -- Yes, we will pay for the new airport.
ReplyDeleteKC News feeds need to stop telling this lie to the public. Only the taxpayers, their children, their grandchildren and their great-grandchildren will be paying for this unnecessary expense.
To hear the spokespeople tell us they CANNOT FIX THE PROBLEMS AT KCI is a big fat lie. Of course, you can fix whatever is wrong. Stop telling the voters that it's impossible.
Voters need to stand up and say NO to this ripoff proposal. Only you and I will be paying - not the airlines - not anyone else. VOTE NO.
KC needs 1 billion to reconfigure or make 'smaller and more pretty' the down town loop. it's a knot worthy of ridicule. there is a reason the airport is getting smaller folks. They took ur fckn family farms and wall street has been ass fckn the bread basket. Do u get beef from australia at trader joe's. and that's voluntary labeling.
ReplyDeletemore regional self identity and sufficiency or another federal shit show shoved dwn throat, the choice could be yours.
ReplyDeleteI love arriving at our current airport it's a great way to welcome someone to Wyandotte in 1981. It smells like cows and it's full of obese people. Don't change it please. Our image needs to stay the way it is
ReplyDeleteupdate it do it smells like a sewer treatment plant like the river market and it will still be full of obese people. Welcome to 2018.
ReplyDeletehas not smelled of cow since 1991 fool, the new airport will have fatter ppl.
ReplyDeleteKraske says it is KOOL.
ReplyDeleteActive wear is a hit is KC, will look great in new airport.
ReplyDelete