TKC BREAKING AND EXCLUSIVE NEWS!!! COMING SOON: KANSAS CITY PREPS RED LIGHT CAMERA CLASS-ACTION LAWSUIT!!!
It's nice to see a bit of local unity before the holidays and I'm surprised that people of every Kansas City demographic seem to be organizing against local spy tech.
To wit . . .
CHECK OUT EVEN MORE CHATTER OF AN UPCOMING KANSAS CITY CLASS-ACTION LAWSUIT AGAINST THE RED-LIGHT CAMERAS!!!
Here's just one of MANY e-mails that I'm getting about Kansas City frustration with City Council red light shenanigans . . .
"I want to get my money back for the ticket I paid that was illegal. Starting a class action suit . . ."
Again, this is just one note out of SEVERAL this week as we've seen increasing public discontent with the effort to save red light cameras . . . Along with more than a bit of local lawyer interest.
Developing . . .
Photo babe: Rachel Aldana
Link update:
KCTV5: Red-light camera ruling puts brakes on council's plans
KCUR: New Court Ruling Threatens Kansas City Red-Light Cameras
City legal will save us?
ReplyDeleteRight?
Holy cow she has some utters on her fo sho. Emergency flotation!
ReplyDeleteYou people sound like a bunch of communist. Traffic Cameras are Capitalism at it's finest moment.
ReplyDeleteHow much more of this Red Light shit we have to put up with around here.
ReplyDeleteLocal Spy Tech. Yes your safer using Google, Yahoo, etc, etc where you won't be spied on.
ReplyDeleteDamn Red Light Cameras violate my privacy! I'm sticking with Facebook from here on out!
ReplyDelete2:58 PM The dumbasses in City Legal Dept. is what got us here. Sue the shit out of them and then file complaints against the attorney on the legislation for incompetence. Don't stop.
ReplyDeleteAnyone else actually read this? https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=67793
ReplyDeleteThis legal drama is just the typical end result of contracting out an inherently governmental responsibility and the incompetence of local elected officials.
But KCMO contracts out EVERY governmental activity: public safety; water services; planning; and on and on.
ReplyDeleteAnd then holds NONE of the contactors or nonprofits accountable for much of anything.
Frees up lots of time for meetings, receptions, and comped meals.
KCMO Legal Department is just a cesspool of incompetent lawyers who can't get real jobs in the private sector.
ReplyDeleteTony go back to sleep or something?
ReplyDeleteProbably editing a Glazer blurb which can sometimes take a whole day to turn into something barely readable and understandable.
ReplyDeleteGlazer on Thanksgiving tonight?
ReplyDeleteGlazer on Glazer?
ReplyDeleteLet me guess. Tonight our friend and TKC favorite talks about booze, food, and sports betting. Like it or not, it doesn't get any better than that.
ReplyDeleteThe economy is healthy, 41 News.
ReplyDeleteLMAO!!
Follow the money. Who paid who behind scenes to adopt this fund raiser for the city coffers.
ReplyDeleteThe real story is the corruption in action to adopt these cameras.
Bet no fed gonna be lookin into dat sitsheation. Huh??
Velcome to Amerika. Your papers please. Paples por favor.
ReplyDeleteHey get a quote from dat shufflin shine...Bozo Alonzo.
ReplyDeleteNo 4:42 that be Glazer mounting Byron.
ReplyDeleteAnyone else notice Tony has been getting lazy since Glazer came on board?
ReplyDeleteHe has a sugar daddy now so he can afford to be a slacker.
ReplyDeleteGlazer post should be popping up any minute now.
ReplyDeleteUNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. THE CITY OF KANSAS CITY,MISSOURI
ReplyDeleteThis is a civil action for injunctive relief and civil penalties brought against the City of Kansas City, Missouri ("KCMO") pursuant to Sections 309(b) and (d) of the federal Clean Water Act ("CWA"), 33 U.S.c. §§ 1319(b) and (d), for KCMO's numerous illegal discharges of pollutants in violation of Section 301(a) of the CWA, 33 U.S.C. § 131 1 (a), including discharges of raw sewage, and for violations of conditions established in the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ("NPDES") permits issued to KCMO by the Missouri Department of Natural Resources ("MDNR"), as authorized by the EPA under Section 402(b) of the CWA, 33 U.S.c. § 1342(b). This action is also brought under Section 504(a) ofthe CWA, 33 U.S.C. § 1364(a), to require KCMO to take such actions as may be necessary to abate the imminent and substantial endangerment to the health of persons presented by KCMO's sewer system, resulting in discharges of raw sewage to homes, yards, parks, playgrounds, and streets.
UNITED STATES OF MURICA' v. THE CITY OF CITY KANSAS, MISSOURI
ReplyDeleteMizzura
ReplyDeleteThis is hilarious. The company in Arizona collects all that red light cam money and splits it with the city. Now the city is gonna loose its ass and the company is going to keep it's share under the contract. Talk about a classic P.T. Barnham move on the city. Arizona company makes a fortune and sucker punches Kansas City in the process. I wonder how the city father feel mow that they realize the whole damn city was really working for the camera business.
ReplyDeleteIf course the city moms and dads could care less because they know the dumb asses of KC will turn right around a re-elect them to office. If they had numb nuts detectors KC would be alarm central.
All those folks who advised against contracting those cameras and were castigated and here we sit with a city hall full of incompetent bureaucrats both elected and salaried. If this does not become the big "Oh Shit" of 2013 then the dumb asses of KC are never going to wake up and smell the coffee.
But enough about the red light cameras. Watch how well the open-ended change order contract for the streetcar construction works out.
ReplyDeleteAnd then these same people will do a deal for a 1000 room hotel.
And the city's still ponying up $14 million a year for the P&L District.
How much of this kind of success can the taxpayers afford?