
TKC Note: Some of you folks think you know who Brutus is but you don't. In any event, I always have to remind people that it's not about the messenger but the message. Today, Brutus blesses us with some intriguing analysis of the upcoming Mayoral race that needs to be well remembered by Kansas City Mayoral hopefuls.
Check it:
A PATH TO VICTORY BY THE FUNK
For the game that is musical chairs for the final two seats in the March 28 run off for Mayor, the most frequently asked question is---can the Funk squeeze into the General Election?
Most, but not all insiders, say NO. He is one and done on primary night, February 28.
Not so fast.
As the number of opponents have added up, Funk's chances have risen too. We now have 5 serious contenders, Mike Burke, Sly James, Jim Rowland, Jonas Hughes, and Deb Hermann.
Tony pointed out weeks ago this is highly unusual. It is almost as if it were an open seat. When there is no incumbent Mayor then 4 to 6 major candidates are the norm, think back to 1979, 1991 and 1999. The election in 2007 was a record breaker with 9 serious candidates running for an open seat.
Incumbent Mayors usually face only one substantive opponent for re-election. But with the Funk we keep getting the unusual.
So how does a guy with a reported 18% re-elect number get re-elected? Well if you go back to those open races of the past you will see that the top two vote getters only get vote total percentages in the 20's. For example, in the last primary Brooks got 26% and Funkhouser received 25.6%. In the 1999 primary neither Kay Barnes nor George Blackwood blew past 30% and there were 5 serious candidates.
Assuming the two top vote getters only need to be in the mid 20% range, the Funk is in shooting range from day one. Can he hold his 18% and add another 7%? Yes he can especially if the other candidates start ignoring him and going after each other believing the sure path to be Mayor is to be the finalist against the Funk.
Funk is rather smartly laying out a position that no one else can claim---the beat up but still standing Don Quixote battling the windmills of special interests. He just might string together enough votes throughout the city to make it. Funk will have to do it with few campaign resources, but he is the only candidate to date with substantial name identification. He has paid for it dearly, but he has it. Hermann thinks she is a house hold name---NOT. And a fair amount of her name ID is associated with a discredited and dysfunctional City Council in the view of the public. Rowland has a base, but not a citywide base of votes so he has a ways to go. The others will have to find some political ground to stand on.
Funk has one important obstacle and that is the Northland. In previous polling his favorable numbers are always highest there. He needs one but not both of the northlanders out of the race. If Jeff Roe stays with him to show everyone again his political skill he has lots to work with with Burke and Hermann. The development attorney and the party switching, now ethics challenged City Hall insider are both raw meat for him.
So Funk makes the General Election against one of the contenders. He will not be without campaign funds at that point. The money folks in KC are chicken shit to be kind and many will be covering their bets. He may not have the most, but he should have enough money to compete. Anything can happen in those last 28 days. His chances will be largely dictated by who he is running against.
And here is the wild card---the Earnings Tax issue that is likely to be on the ballot if a statewide mandate passes in November. If King Rex decides that a helpful tool to wiping out the E Tax is dumping half a million dollars behind a slate of anti E Tax council candidates, this will be one crazy place next March.
A lot is still to play out in the next few months. But don't handicap this race without the Funk on your play card.
#############
Funk wins.
ReplyDeleteHmmmm .... Brutus.
ReplyDeleteWould that be like "Brutus the Buckeye," which is the Ohio State mascot?
I only ask because there is a politico named Kevin Hennosy who lives for arcane references and who went to Ohio State, so I just might think that we may know who Brutus is.
That sounds just like one of his rants, and he is the only live person I have ever heard say that Funk can still win re-election.
Because Funk and Gloria are the undead amoung us, I do not count them.
Co-mayors are toast in every part of this city.
ReplyDeleteCo-Mayors can't win. If this happens I'm buying Tony a bus pass to Arizona. Won't be able to stand it.
ReplyDeleteMr Mark Funkhouser is a loser. He was born a loser, did his damnedest to hide the fact that he is a loser during his tenure as our City Auditor. He came flaming out as a loser when he became our failed mayor. Loser bright and true.
ReplyDeleteSo...
Dearest Civic Leaders,
What the hell is the matter with you? What are you waiting for? Christmas? It is time to get off the fence in this mayor's race. Anyone thinking about jumping in now is a political dilettante. A wuss. There is no white stallion in the offing bearing the PERFECT candidate. No such person exists. PICK ALREADY!
TKC laid out the candidates. Jim Rowland is a no-starter. The guy is just one self-congratulatory rude man. He over values his mental capacity. We have had enough with the "smartest guy in the room" syndrome.
Sly James doesn't have backing or experience where it counts. If we collectively get hit by a city bus, he's the guy to call. Some where in his campaign is a lawyer joke.
Deb Hermann? If this city weren't so down on it's knees I'd say "maybe" She made some odd choices with Funkhouser at the helm. Maybe she backed him and his idiot ideas hoping that she could bring him to heel? Her work as Finance Chair is admirable, but she lacks the deep knowledge of how business really gets done. Her neighborhood leader status helped as a council member, but we need someone with a clue to present day economics. Someone who can work wisely to retain our jobs and set the stage to grow new jobs when this economy finally lets lose it's death grip. Sorry, that isn't Hermann. Burke? That's my choice as I thought it out.
Sure, we all say "anyone but Funkhouser." I think Kansas City deserves better than just "anyone".
Oh Dear, I forgot Jonas Hughes.
ReplyDeleteIt would be more credible if you knew when the elections were. Elections aren't on Mondays. It will be primary Feb 22 and general March 22, 2011
ReplyDeleteI'd like to say GODDAM, that guy's ugly. But I really don't want to offend his brother, who I kinda like! (Haw haw haw!)
ReplyDeletereal UGLY
ReplyDeleteInteresting post but not a chance in Hell he gets into the finals. There are too many strong names in this election. He won't get the votes and more importantly he doesn't and won't have the money to compete.
ReplyDeleteI agree. Everybody hopes to get in to the finals with Funk. If they do they know it's a sure win.
ReplyDeleteThis is Brutus and my fault for getting the 2011 election days wrong. I was going back to check the vote percentages in one of the previous races and those incorrect dates stuck in my mind. And as for predictions--all I was saying is there is way for him to get to the finals. Lord help us all if the co-mayors return for a second term.
ReplyDeleteIf I were the co-mayors id put my house on the market now.
ReplyDeleteSorry, Steve, but Funk (nor Rowland, YOUR candidate) has 'raw meat' to work with on Deb Hermann. Her ethics are above reproach and her "party-switching" is a non-issue. This is a non-partisan race, in case you are growing addled by being away from the Mayor's office for so long. And it's actually a compliment that both Dems and Repubs think enough of Deb to make her a committee woman in her county. And her name credibility is high and favorable, unlike your candidate whose biggest claim to fame was getting up from his chair, storming over to Bonnie Sue Cooper and screaming at her, all during a council session. What kind of base is that? Even the 4th District residents, whom Rowland was supposed to represent, hate him.
ReplyDeleteDeb Hermann is a tired old bitch who hates Black people.
ReplyDeleteHow's that for raw meat?
She won't get many votes outside Gracemore and none South of the River.
She needs to go back to college and get that degree. Maybe then she will learn tolerance.
ouch
ReplyDeleteHas Funk outraised Crispin yet? Last I checked he was still working on getting $700 bucks in the bank. The guy's campaign will be over by October.
ReplyDeleteAnd why exactly do you claim she hates black people?
ReplyDeleteShe can't get along with Sharon, Terry, Wayne Cauthen or any Black person who stands up for themselves.
ReplyDeleteShe has got problems and she won't get a single vote outside of her small, small white flight neighborhood.
Poopsie,
ReplyDeleteHolyshit, I thought that was me posting... damn.
Not liking three black people doesn't mean she doesn't like black people. There are white people she doesn't like, I bet -- does that mean she doesn't like white people?
ReplyDeleteNot liking three black people doesn't mean she doesn't like black people. There are white people she doesn't like, I bet -- does that mean she doesn't like white people?
ReplyDeletePoopsie (or should I call you Steve?), you know nothing. Deb is certainly not a bigot and gets along with people of call colors. You're projecting your own prejudice onto Deb and it won't fly!
ReplyDeleteSweetie Pie, you've made a critical error in judgment by underestimating Deb Hermann's intelligence. She knows businesses and the City inside and out. She is the only candidate who can beat Funkhouser. She can deliver multiple council districts, whereas Rowland can deliver maybe one, James and Burke deliver zero. If you want Funk out, vote for Hermann.
ReplyDeleteFunk has recently been pushing for votes on the east side.
ReplyDeleteWe will see one of the black Mayor candidates drop out and push his votes to Funky.
Hermann and Burke will split the north.
The fight will be won in the forth and sixth.
That kill Rowland no one likes him in the forth. So it is Door to door in the forth and sixth