The City Council needs to respond to Mammy-Gate!!! Gloria must go before she causes more damage to Kansas City!!!



There is no question that Co-Mayors Funkhouser and Squitiro are ruling over City Hall like King and Queen. The recent firing of Ruth Bates (the victim of the "Mammy" slur by the Mayor's wife) is simply the most recent example of their arrogance, vindictiveness and stubborness when it comes their mostly wrongheaded decision making process. Even the Mayor's closest supporters have said time and again that he and his wife have become insulated and no longer reach out to former friends for advice. The cowardly firing of Bates, WHILE THE CO-MAYORS WERE OUT OF TOWN, seems like the poor decision of an scared couple on the run rather than leadership in the face of controversy.

Sadly, strangely every dumb joke I've written about the Mayor now has a even more merit given the lack of character and unqualified support he has shown for his unpaid, volunteer, and foul mouthed wife. The excuse the Mayor initially used for the slur was equally awkward and lacking of any kind of merit:

Let's not forget that Funkhouser explained on KMBZ that his wife regularly used nicknames for employees and added an "e" to the end of their names. THIS "MAM-EE" EXCUSE IS SO LAME, SO SLAPDASH AND RIDICULOUS THAT IT NOT ONLY GIVES CREDENCE TO THE CLAIMS MADE BY BATES BUT ALSO REVEALS KANSAS CITY'S MAYOR TO BE HOPELESSLY OUT OF TOUCH WITH HIS MINORITY CONSTITUENTS AND REALITY!!!

Even worse, the Mayor has been going around town basically calling Bates a liar. He has been using the office of Mayor to quash a legitimate complaint against his unpaid, volunteer wife who doesn't belong within 10 feet of City Hall. Mayor Funky has also recruited columnists and conservative talk radio scumbags from sinking stations to support his position. Still, one question remains:

DOES ANYBODY BUT BILL DRUMMOND, THE GLASS ETCHER GUY, BELIEVE THAT THE MAYOR'S ACTIONS CONCERNING BATES AND HIS SHOELESS WIFE IN CITY HALL ARE APPROPRIATE?


I don't wanna talk crap on Drummond because he's basically a nice guy and the kind of crazy civic activist that makes Kansas City so hilarious but he has his own problems in the Crossroads that probably should concern him more than online debates regarding Mayor Funky; besides I don't think a white dude who tirelessly advocates for a luxury living space really brings that much to the table in a discussion of Kansas City's divisive racial politics.

And speaking of the sordid subject of racial disparity in Kansas City . . . Let's not forget that Mayor Funky is once again relying on bigots from around the metro to back his cause.

Sadly, these racists don't know that the move to switch Bates to the Water Department (literally throwing her down the well) was out of line and probably an abuse of power in and of itself. A line from the Mayor's press release regarding the subject also gives a bit of perspective on the employment of Bates:
"All positions in the mayor's office are political appointments in the city's unclassified system and mayoral staffers serve at the pleasure of the mayor,"
Therefore, a lateral move to the Water Department would have been inappropriate for political appointment and it's just another sign that the Funkhouser's have no problem abusing power to try and save their neck. More importantly, "serving at the pleasure of the Mayor" is not a justification for racial slurs to be thrown around the Mayor's office in Kansas City. Let's make this simple:

EVERYONE EARNING A PAYCHECK HAS THE RIGHT TO FILE A COMPLAINT WITHOUT FEAR OF REPRISAL OR RETRIBUTION! MAYOR FUNKY'S RETALIATION AGAINST BATES CLEARLY INDICATES HE HAS ABSOLUTELY NO RESPECT FOR THE PEOPLE WORKING AT CITY HALL!!!

Obviously, the Mayor Funky's few remaining loyalists will be out goose stepping across town to prove their loyalty to the Co-Mayors but their propaganda is uninspiring and out of mainstream political thought in Kansas City.

THERE IS NO ONE WITH ANY CREDIBILITY IN KANSAS CITY WHO WILL DEFEND MAYOR FUNKY'S MISHANDLING OF THIS CASE OR THE USE OF THE RACIAL SLUR BY GLORIA SQUITIRO!!!.

It is a clear cut case of retaliation, nothing more. TKC reported on the ongoing attacks against Bates last week but I honestly didn't think it was this bad. With this action, Mayor Funky has lost any hopes of credibility within the minority community for the remainder of his first term. This example of how poorly Mayor Funky treats minorities in his own house is indicative of his lack of sensitivity and skill when it comes to his overall grasp (or lack thereof) of community relations in this diverse city.

Finally, Internet denizens are on the top of their game when they ask an important question which Mayor Funky and the mainstream media have overlooked:

WILL KANSAS CITY BE FORCED TO PAY FOR THE DEFENSE OF GLORIA SQUITIRO (A VOLUNTEER) IN THE INEVITABLE AND JUSTIFIABLE LAWSUIT AGAINST THE MAYOR'S OFFICE?!!!

Squitiro's presence is unsanctioned and has been the source of ridicule on my part since last year given the woman's penchant to go barefoot in Kansas City's highest office . . . When it eventually gets out, this case will once again demonstrate that Squitiro doesn't belong at City Hall despite the Mayor's stubborn insistence. Squitiro has singlehandedly destroyed the Mayor's once promising career as all women seem to do to their husbands. However, the fact that she should be costing Kansas City with her repeated attacks against African-American females is unacceptable. In both the "Mammy-Gate" mess and another instance where she referred to another African-American employee as "Bernie Mac" her unprofessional, rude and intolerant behavior has damaged her husband's and (more importantly) this town's reputation.

CURRENTLY, THE MAYOR'S OFFICE IS WITHOUT ANY REPRESENTATION OF THE BLACK COMMUNITY AND THE REMAINING MINORITY WORKER IS MERELY A RECENT COLLEGE GRADUATE WHO IS NOW THE LOWEST PAID STAFFER IN MAYOR FUNKY'S CAMP . . . The pattern of discrimination, contempt and lack of consideration for Kansas City's people of color is now clear.

I don't know how this mess will play out but it's not going to be pretty. In the end, most reasonable people understand that GLORIA SQUITIRO MUST GET OUT OF CITY HALL and concerns over the actions of this out of control woman are going not only going to lead to a financial setback for Kansas City but also damage our reputation when this becomes yet another racially divisive issue that embroils the metro area.

To avoid this conflict TKC and people who don't live in their mom's basement are begging the City Council to pass some kind of resolution or ordinance (whatever works) to end Gloria Squitiro's reign of terror. Squitiro's actions have led to a potentially costly lawsuit soon to be filed against Kansas City and with no clear definition of her role in the Mayor's office, future actions against this town are inevitable from the Mayor's foul mouthed spouse who apparently can't get along with African-American females. There needs to be some documentation of where Squitiro stands, and for the good of Kansas City it's obvious that GLORIA MUST GO!!!

Comments

  1. Time for a recall. Point blank. Better yet, the city council needs to ask the gub'ner to remove Funk from office.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Fat black women have been a lightning rod for controversy in every office I have ever worked in. They bring the 'tude, a chip on their shoulder and a large-and-in-charge demeanor almost without exception.
    I've worked with some wonderful ones but mmmmmmm, child...you see and office with a few older fat mammy-types and you know there is gonna be trouble.

    ReplyDelete
  4. mayor didnt fire bates the human resources fired her after she refused to take the job in the water dept at the same pay as she was making. so i dont feel sorry for bates besides her husband mike is pulling her strings also. im willing to bet my pay check against anyone out there that ruth bates has called the mayor a few racist names also.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Obviously you're ignorant. Ed Wolf fired Bates.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Take a deep breath Tony. Ruth is going to be alright. She is probably in for a big cash settlement that will make her much better off than most people.

    ReplyDelete
  7. She's not going anywhere as long as he is the Mayor. I think we can sit back and wait the legal action from Ms. Bates. If they lose, it will be time to deliver a finishing off blow.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Anyone know who is paying the Co-Mayor's lawyer? Or who that lawyer is?

    ReplyDelete
  9. Bill Drummond is a convicted felon that once stalked a friend of mine and caused tens of thousands of dollars of damage to her house because she broke up with him.

    He filled her toilets with concrete, painted obscenities everywhere, broke fixtures, and appliances.

    Since I have seen him at art events several times very very high trying to seduce art institute fresh meat 25 years younger than he is.

    Class act that Bill Drummond.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I am sure she is a victim.

    Wish I could get a payout just for being fat, black, incompetent and obnoxious.

    ReplyDelete
  11. what are you talking about. you know nothing.

    ReplyDelete
  12. leave out the black statement and you nailed gloria.

    ReplyDelete
  13. I just can't believe this. Why didn't the Mayor do his own dirty work?

    ReplyDelete
  14. Seems like squit is blogging here. These assumptions about black women
    are typical squit.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Funkhouser supporters can be so hateful when they are pushed.

    ReplyDelete
  16. the funks in their march to get the mayor's seat used many fine people. Brit, Aggie, Landon, Jeff, Amy, Evert, Ruth, Mike, Jim and a host of others. Once they were installed they saw know need to be nice. Now that they need people again, they are reduced to using Bill Drummond, Anita Dixon and, of course, Marie Young. NICE..

    ReplyDelete
  17. I think you're right about the council Tony there needs to be a resolution about the use of racial remarks within the ranks of elected officals. That way when Ms. Squitiro is found guilty she won't be able to work in city hall anymore or will face a reprimand. Now she's not accountable to anybody.

    ReplyDelete
  18. I have known Ruth Bates for a number of years. She is a quiet, petite, intelligent woman, who has a law degree and was grossly underpaid and treated poorly by KC's mayoral odd couple. Ms. Bates is the antithesis of the stereotypical comments about black women posted by the hate trolls who love to write disparaging blog comments regarding civil rights issues.

    Anyone who have ever filed an EEOC complaint knows that filing a discrimination complaint is not a decision that is done on a whim to get money. It is not an easy process, and each complaint must be fully documented or it is not accepted. The burden of proof initially lies on the complainant to lay out a basis for discrimination, essentially stating why they felt discriminated against and/or harassed. They must also indicate what efforts they took to resolve the problem internally before filing the complaint. Retaliation complaints are much easier as the time frame of the retaliatory acts is usually explicit and easy to prove.

    I agree with inafunk and Tony in their questions regarding the co-mayors' legal representation. Establishing the co-mayor's capacity in the mayor's office is crucial to the city's lean taxpayer dollars and might place the co-mayors in a catch-22.

    FROM THE EEOC website:
    http://www.eeoc.gov/facts/qanda.html

    Under most EEOC-enforced laws, compensatory and punitive damages also may be available where intentional discrimination is found. Damages may be available to compensate for actual monetary losses, for future monetary losses, and for mental anguish and inconvenience.

    Punitive damages also may be available if an employer acted with malice or reckless indifference. Punitive damages are not available against the federal, state or local governments.

    If the co-mayor acted as a city official, then there will be no need to pay punitive damages if the complaint is upheld - but it raises an ethics issue about nepotism in the mayor's office.

    If the co-mayor acted as a volunteer, the odd couple are on their own and may need to look to their few remaining supporters to "drink the kool-aid" and ante up to pay their punitive damages.

    What a dilemma!

    I, for one, look forward to the elected Mayor's welcome to the NAACP in KC in 2009!

    That will be interesting.

    ReplyDelete
  19. And some people live in fantasy land.

    ReplyDelete
  20. ed wolf fired bates after she refused to take the job at the water dept. idiot human resources started the procedure.

    ReplyDelete
  21. No HR was a pawn. The mayors pulled this off on their own. A couple of weeks ago Bates made one last attempt to see if there was a way out of this mess besides the lawsuit. She talked to squit for 2 hours. Several people who passed by on the staircase outside of the mayors' office witnessed Bates looking strained and squit actually thumped her chest and proclaimed that she was "Italian". Whatever that means...
    a small party gathered on the lower stairs. Some of us were overhearing a very strange conversation. It boils down to this.. the mayor's wife is pissing on the fence post. She has marked her territory..City Hall.
    O'Bannon and Franklin should have declined the mayors' request to stand as proxy to his fumbled attempt to chase Bates away. It failed. The woman was fired. I hope that they find the morals to not add lying for the mayors and present to anyone involved in the upcoming suit a job description of the position suggested to Bates. This was a ploy in the continuing effort on the part of the mayors to turn Bates into a clerk. A fine job, but NOT what she was hired to do. They needed this to present as evidence in court. Bates was correct in not falling into that trap.

    ReplyDelete
  22. So, are we gonna get to work on a recall petition or just stand around here pulling each others' peckers?

    ReplyDelete
  23. Looks like a lot of pecker pulling to me. Gloria is a troll. Get her out of there. Too bad cause I like the Funk, just not his junk in his trunk.

    ReplyDelete
  24. This bitch is looking for a pay day. She was given the opportunity to work at another position for the same pay and she refused.

    Do you really expect her to work well in that climate?

    Funk has been a useless douche, no doubt about that. But this woman was given the opportunity to work for her paycheck and she refused.

    She has her eyes on the lawsuit lottery.

    Was she wronged? That's up to a court to decide.

    Clearly she is looking for a payday, does she care about the racist aspects of this situation? Does she want things to improve?

    I don't think I would want to know or hang around anyone involved. They all sound like assholes.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Hayyyyyyyaayyyy. I'm bout to to get payyyyayyyyyyddd.
    Sistas' doin' it for they ownselves!!!

    ReplyDelete
  26. Great, the staff is gathering to eavesdrop on a private conversation and then yacks about it anonymously on a known funk hate site. Really impressive crowd. Get back to work you slackers.

    ReplyDelete
  27. You know what this post needs? More bold, red type in 30pt font.

    Just saying.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Keep the Funk.

    Ditch the bitch.

    I dare you to find one person who disagrees. Tony actually has it right on this one. Good job.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Bates was making 36k in the mayor's office with a LAW degree; in contrast; Joe Miller and Kendrick Blackwood make 80K a piece. Bates, with a law degree and work experience, was making about 5k more than Crispin Rea, who didn't even have a college degree until a week ago.

    She WAS royally screwed on pay.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Anonymous said...Great, the staff is gathering to eavesdrop on a private conversation and then yacks about it anonymously on a known funk hate site. Really impressive crowd. Get back to work you slackers. 5/20/2008 03:48:00 PM
    ===================================

    Get back to work? Are you talking about the City Hall staffers belonging to Mayor Smart With Nothinghouser?? Aren't these the same people who just struck out on the tax abatement for light rail, brought felons for the Funk to laude during the State of the City Address and forgot to vet Frances Semler? So you're kidding, right?

    ReplyDelete
  31. Bill Drummond is a convicted felon that once stalked a friend of mine and caused tens of thousands of dollars of damage to her house because she broke up with him.
    ==============================

    Any link to this? Any legal citation? This would be a hoot (alas not for the lady you described).

    ReplyDelete
  32. I was interested in that delicious little detail, too, inafunk, but alas I could find no reference to it on Casenet, the Missouri court database. There were a few references to a "William Drummond," but they didn't match the age of the one we've all come to loathe.

    You gotta admit ... the image of him pouring concrete down a toilet and painting obscenities on the wall (albeit in a artistic manner) are priceless.

    I did know a woman he dated for a while though I doubt it's the same one he allegedly stalked. Apart from recalling that she came to think of him as "creepy," the most vivid memory of her Drummond stories involved her objections to getting dressed up in the latex fetish outfit he prefers his partners wearing during sex. (Something about the feel of rubbing against the latex ... an image I'm still trying to sear from my mind.)

    ReplyDelete
  33. How many font changes was that?

    ReplyDelete
  34. If Funkhouser hired 2 brown people and let go 1 black person. How could you call foul?

    ReplyDelete
  35. Why loathe Bill Drummond, No One's Friend? He is a pathetic creature. And if he gets tagged for doing what anon 741AM suggested, then he will be both pathetic and ignored completely.

    ReplyDelete
  36. Anon 741 we are still waiting on some back up for your post about Bill Drummond.

    ReplyDelete
  37. I'm voting for Gloria to take over for Funky

    ReplyDelete
  38. anon 741AM --- seems you full of it. Nice try... facts work better than BS.

    ReplyDelete
  39. Thanks for the knowledge Anon 10:38am. The Mayor's Office is making this lady out like a do nothing uneducated lady.

    I'm glad to see her take it to the mayor. He is such a jerk. I for one can't wait to see him recalled.

    ReplyDelete
  40. I found this out about Bill Drummond... taken from the CCA website. He always refers to himself as "your friend from the crossroads." For sure, he is not my friend and it seems like he isn't the friend of many from the Crossroads. Nothing on the apparently spurious charge from ANON 741AM

    http://blog.crossroadscommunityassociation.org/?p=84

    Update on Recent Quarterly Meeting and Vote
    Filed under: Communications — debora at 7:21 am on Wednesday, April 16, 2008
    We had a large turnout to our Quarterly Members’ Meeting on April 10th. As many of you know, the Board asked the membership to vote on whether to remove Bill Drummond from the Board. After the Board’s and Bill Drummond’s positions were given and community members responded, a vote was taken. The situation was resolved with a vote of 61 to 3 to remove Bill Drummond from the Board. The Board now looks forward to continuing with the great projects we are working on for and with this community.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

TKC COMMENT POLICY:

Be percipient, be nice. Don't be a spammer. BE WELL!!!

- The Management