TKC BREAKING AND EXCLUSIVE NEWS!!! KANSAS CITY QUESTION 3 VOTE NO SIGNS HIT THE STREETS FOR APRIL 2ND BALLOT!!!
Kansas City (or at least the few dozen people who still vote) goes back the ballot to answer some important questions on April 2nd.
In a really interesting turn of events . . .
ON QUESTION 3 KANSAS CITY VOTERS WILL BE ASKED TO DECIDE THE FATE OF MUNICIPAL FUNDING OF NUKE FACILITIES!!!
It's an important and somewhat groundbreaking ballot initiative brought to the voters by the "Peace Planters" and supported mostly by grassroots efforts.
On the other side of the equation . . .
THE QUESTION 3 "VOTE NO" CAMPAIGN IS FUNDED BY KANSAS CITY POWER BROKERS AND IS HITTING THE STREETS WITH THEIR SIGNAGE THIS WEEK!!!
Because it's Friday Afternoon . . . Allow me this somewhat artsy insight . . .
Rhetoric about killing jobs in front of an empty and blighting former Kansas City School at the behest of the military industrial complex seems poignant . . . I don't know exactly what it means so I'll let the photo speak for itself.
Like it or not, the sign is effective because the nuke vote is juxtaposed against "killing" local jobs.
In fact, the Question 3 Vote No folks are doing their best to run an exciting campaign in this off-season election . . .
Check out their promo video that's just about as scary as anything on Fox News . . .
Keep America Safe! Vote NO on Question 3 Tuesday April 2nd.
Again, hopefully this IMPORTANT KANSAS CITY NUKE QUESTION brings more people to the ballot and reminds the locals that they do, in fact, have a say in the way our Democracy runs if only voters bother to show up.
DEVELOPING . . .
Nice pic.
ReplyDeleteInstagram?
If you vote yes on 3, you might as well tell organized labor to spread their legs and kick them in the ball sack as hard as you can. The new plant was the largest union construction project in KC this century.
ReplyDeleteIs that the same union that Honeywell bitch slapped and broke last year?
ReplyDeleteThe real question has more to do with local government subsidy of a toxic industry and not nukes Tony.
ReplyDeleteVote Yes.
ReplyDeleteUnions? Hell now I will vote yes.
ReplyDeleteIllegal campaign signage on public property, citizens should act and remove this litter. Good work TKC!
ReplyDeleteQuestion 3 doesn't kill jobs, nor does it disarm nuclear weapons. The people behind Vote No lowest common denominator simpletons.
ReplyDeleteNice photo tony, you're getting better.
ReplyDeleteVote NO. Don't kill kc jobs.
ReplyDeleteQuestion 3 doesn't kill a single job, that's just another line they use to scare the dummies.
ReplyDeleteYou'll notice very few if any of these signs will be appearing in people's yards, unlike the citizens who have signs that support voting YES on Question 3. Vote No pays naive Liberal™ college students $500 a week to put these signs in empty lots and medians.
Vote No. Don't let Golden Ghetto peaceniks Henry Stoever, a total crackpot, and his cuckoo wife, ramrod this initiative down KCMO. And like unions or not (I don't), this plant does mean jobs and lots of them.
ReplyDeleteThe plant can survive without tax subsidy. If they can create jobs then then can do it without taxpayer help. That's the real question.
ReplyDelete