Not too long ago Sen. Claire McCaskill defeated Rep. Todd Akin in a controversial election that earned national attention on the topic of women's rights.
Accordingly, most of the press that followed the victory championed Sen. Claire as an advocate of women's issues . . .
Even during the inauguration it seems that that Sen. Claire is part of a movement to "champion progressive ideals" and support President Obama.
Then again . . .
SEN. CLAIRE'S MOST NOTABLE MEDIA MENTION DURING PRESIDENT OBAMA'S INAUGURATION TODAY IS HER FASHION TWEETING AND CALLING OUT A HAT WORN BY SUPREME COURT JUSTICE ANTONIN SCALIA!!!
Here's the damage . . .
Claire McCaskill Is Obsessed With Antonin Scalia's Hat
So, Sen. Claire might bring hope and change to Missouri during her term but also will help bring better fashion sense to Washington in a way that's not catty or stereotypical at all.
DEVELOPING . . .
Still better than akin.
ReplyDeleteThat woman is a waste of air and water.
ReplyDeleteTrue.
ReplyDeletewonder what the bill on this conga line is going to cost?
ReplyDeleteIf there were any justice in this world, she and her party would be tried and hung for treason.
ReplyDeleteIt was the Tea Party that was treasonous. Example:
ReplyDelete"Lock & Load, let's take back our country"
Byron is likely to be done-in by an ACA death panel for being a non-productive, resource vampire drag on the State, but he'll just smile and say OK.
ReplyDeleteAnon 3:31 PM
ReplyDeleteNo one two meters tall is inbred. Your knowledge of biology is even worse than your knowledge of politics. But hey, you're from either MO or Kansas ...
See, I can use stereotypes, too.
Good one, Byron.
DeleteOh ! Byron's a metric cocksucker ?
DeleteClaire needs a reality show on Style TV. After all she is Missouri's little trend setter for fashion.
ReplyDeleteI think 3:31 must have meant inbred as in the sense of a toothless West Viginia hag, partly descended of a Sasquatch/human interbreeding from the late 1800's giving birth to a baby from her own Sasquatch night of fun.
ReplyDeleteClaire probably has one of those hairly logs in the family woodpile as well.
Muffin Top Claire. Ugly, smelly, wrinkly old sea hag covered with cottage cheese cellulite. What a disgusting human being. Just another one of Obama's mudhsharks.
ReplyDeleteNo worries for Communist Obama !!!
ReplyDeleteMcDonald's Corp. and a franchise owner have reached a tentative settlement in a lawsuit alleging that food at a Detroit-area restaurant with a large Muslim customer base wasn't prepared according to Islamic dietary laws as advertised.
McDonald's and Finley's Management Co. agreed Friday to pay $700,000. The money will be shared by Dearborn Heights resident Ahmed Ahmed, a Detroit health clinic, the Arab American National Museum in Dearborn and lawyers.
Detroit is way past due for a complete bulldozing into the river and Lake St. Clair.
ReplyDeleteHappy MLK Day from Gabriel Cooper.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.liveleak.com/view?i=23d_1358772467
Some day, we ALL will live in Detroit.
Happy MLK Day
ReplyDeletehttp://www.wwltv.com/news/crime/NOPD-4-shot-on-MLK-and-LaSalle-in-Central-City-187769051.html
That hat is a sacred head covering for all of us members of Opus Dei. The conceals two, lesser rodents, usually hamsters, have have been starved for several days. Once the hat is secured to the wearer,the gnawing and clawing at the wearer's scalp and skull causes great pain, which reminds us of the pain that Christ felt for our sins.
ReplyDelete(Either that or we have totally lost our senses.)
Claire McCaskill has once again been shown to cavort with Satan by making fun of Justice Scalia's headgear.
There's something intrinsically bizarre about a bunch of white supremacists monopolizing the comment threads of a Mexican's blog. Consider it a last gasp. By 2050 we will be a Latino country, so in a way, the Native Americans will have won the race wars. Since, one of my Great Grandfathers was a Native American, I can only say, "Wunderbar!"
ReplyDeleteHere is Isalmic Fundementalism at work in Detroit.
ReplyDeleteFuck these cocksuckers.
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=563_1259115235
shut up Byron and go back to sucking that nigger imposter president you faggot.
ReplyDeleteYes Twitter. Life is now but a tweet.
ReplyDelete4:17
ReplyDeleteByron is right.
We are now as a country with a Judeo/Christian ethos, sliding into a Facist/Fiat ruled country where the takers far outnumber teh makers (See California.).
The ongoing violence inflicted on law abiding citizens by those who populate this ever increasing demographic will NOT abate and in fact will get far worse.
Byron and folks who belive as Byron does will win this conflict in the halls of government and on the streets of this nation.
One more thing, the coming electorate, the new Roman Mob, will kill Byron just as fast as they try to kill the rest of us, literally and metaphorically.
ReplyDeleteThe readership of this blog has definitely declined in knowledge over the years. Too many dead to the world bigots rule on here now.
ReplyDeleteByron I am glad that you do not let them bother you because you are correct and they are without merit.
John Gorman calls folks bigots.
ReplyDeleteNo disputation of facts, ad hominem insults from the left, as usual.
"It was inevitable that the American left, and its mouthpiece the mainstream media, is now resorting to its usual mindless name calling, as they cannot intimidate the NRA and the bulk of the American citizens into meekly acquiescing to their so-called "gun violence" initiative. The majority of the citizenry see this ploy for what it is: an attempt at further incrementalism with the ultimate goal of eviscerating the Second Amendment. Therefore, the references to the NRA and gun advocates as racists as well as comparisons to Hitler and the Nazis are coming fast and furious. It is as predictable as the sun rising in the east.
This past week, Bob Sheiffer of CBS compared defeating the NRA to defeating the Nazis in World War II. Not to be outdone Martin Bashir of NBC said the NRA "...deserved to be compared to Hitler." Representative Hank Johnson (D-GA) claimed: "...they [NRA] cannot get over the fact that Obama is black." And the ever reasonable Charlie Rangel (D-NY) in discussing gun control said: "..the Southern states have cultures that we have to overcome." These are but a few of the many references to either Hitler, the Nazis, racism or backwoods gun-totting hicks in fly-over country since the debate spawned by Obama's determination to impose more stringent gun control measures began.
The well-worn and dog-eared tactic -- used by the Progressive cabal to malign and intimidate their political opponents by the obligatory reference to anyone who opposes their agenda as Nazis, references to World War II and the mindless charge of racism as synonyms for political disagreements -- is beneath contempt and is indicative of the inability to present a coherent argument in support of their position."
ON ANY ISSUE LIBERALS DON'T AGREE WITH. NAME CALLING IS THE RESPONSE.
Agreed. This means, also, Rush Limbaugh is a complete loser. I would post facts to back up my insult, but, is it really necessary?
DeleteAnd just a quick clarification, I'm bashing only Rush here. I don't want to alienate any TKC regulars because I like to read all your comments. And, occasionally, trade insults and ideas with all of you.
You can tell when you have won an argument whenever ANYONE calls you a racist, or a gun nut etc etc, teh argument is over, the opposition, bereft of logic, their postion once again untenable in the face of the facts, will call you names.
ReplyDeleteTake a pill Charles.
ReplyDeleteHey Chuck 'N Buck,
ReplyDeleteYou are the KING of calling names, you racist fuck. I think the white sheet is a little tight on your head today. Why don't you go burn some crosses to let off steam.
Byron is a Quisling wannabe.
ReplyDeleteHe welcomes his own extinction as well. Very strange.
Chuck spits, but he still has the scent of my load on his lips and tongue.
ReplyDeleteDo you think the hate really conceals two hungry rodents digging at his scalp for penance?
ReplyDeleteOk, maybe these concepts are over your head.
ReplyDeleteJohn, 4:57, and 5:00
You just provided prima facie for the argument that I JUST made.
Happy MLK Day.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.metacafe.com/watch/1538987/thugs_shoot_and_kill_young_girl/
5:06 PM WHERE'S BYRON? COMMENTS BRYON?
ReplyDelete"We cannot mistake absolutism for principle, or substitute spectacle for politics, or treat name-calling as reasoned debate," Obama said from atop the Capitol steps overlooking the National Mall.
ReplyDeleteIt would seem the president's address to the nation TODAY would indicate that argument which includes "name calling" is indeed a defeat for those who employ such tactics.
Claire is a pig. I've seen her up close and personal at several events and that woman has no business criticizing anyone's fashion sense.
ReplyDeleteDid anyone else hear Beyonce butcher the national anthem? Girl needs to put a sock in it.
If Claire is that fascinated by hats, I'm surprised Brenda Washington hasn't tried to interview her.
ReplyDeleteAt least Scalia can change his hat, Claire is stuck with her face...
ReplyDeletelotta guys halfway watching "The Beast" drive at 3 mph on PA Ave, and surfing TKC. I found reading the bitter right much more interesting.
ReplyDeleteMust be hard being an Ex KCStar guy. Without dad, they'd be homeless wouldn't they?
This blog is nothing but two fools trying to see who can pile up their own pukeshit the fastest. Congrats on being both the first last place loser winners. If you're curious about who I'm referring to, just pick out the most vocal commenters in this thread.
ReplyDeleteYou two morons think that anyone EVER has had their mind changed by arguing on the internet?
And by the way, it's at stupid looking hat the dude is wearing.
While admittedly a silly topic of discussion considering the trouble this country faces, if we think about McCaskill's comment as a commentary on political dialogue can we not surmise:
ReplyDelete1) She's poking fun at a male Supreme Court justice because he is a safe target. That being, unlikely to respond to her childish tweet. Imagine if she had done the same to Ginsburg or Sotomayor, or heaven forbid Mrs. Obama. So she was being sexist.
2) To send out such a message during the Presidential Inauguration ceremony demonstrates a lack of manners and respect. So she was being rude.
3) Yes, as someone previously pointed out, Justice Scalia is a Catholic. So, some might infer that her comments possibly were a slander on Catholics, although she is a convert herself.
4) Scalia was appointed by Reagan, so perhaps McCaskill was targeting a Republican. Or, as the longest serving current Supreme Court justice, maybe she could be accused of discrimination against the aged.
Bottomline......her comments were inappropriate, rude, and childish. But, is anyone really surprised?