Helling carries baseball analogy out to its illogical conclusion: Hobby Lobby case shows Supreme Court justices, like umpires, can miss calls
Comments
Post a Comment
TKC COMMENT POLICY:
Be percipient, be nice. Don't be a spammer. BE WELL!!!
- The Management
Well that was fucking stupid
ReplyDeleteGlazer must have wrote it.
Kansas City Atheist Coalition Cocksuckers.
ReplyDeleteHelling wants the Gubment to control birth control by way of making the employer pay for it.
ReplyDeleteHobby Lobby objected to providing drugs that would abort the unborn.
The fuckin government needs to get the fuck out of the Health Care business, the Education business and ALL things not related to high ways, and the military.
The over reach of teh Fed is like a goddamn cancer that is just killing this country.
The only people less qualified than the Federal Government, to run damn near anything, is the American Press.
ReplyDelete"Glazer must have wrote it."
ReplyDeleteKCPS?
Helling- Glazer ... Idiots
ReplyDeleteWhen I see Helling I wish his mother had been on the pill or had access to cheap RU-86. Helling is supposedly a journalist, so he ought to do more research on this issue. It is not about birth control pills, it is about abortion pills.
ReplyDeleteI for one am glad that the theologians on the Supreme Court are nice enough to interpret the scriptures for us.
ReplyDeleteAlthough I don't remember reading a lot about abortion in the Good Book.. I reckon I must have just had the wrong translation.
Nancy McNoodly if you wasn't so damn ugly you might know what fucking was
ReplyDeleteINVESTIGATIVE!!! BREAKING!!!!
ReplyDeleteRE: Hobby Lobby case shows Supreme Court justices, like umpires, can miss calls
Dave Helling Strikes OUT With Recent Article!
Mr. Helling opens with an error, when he writes ----"During his confirmation hearings to become the nation’s chief justice, John Roberts compared his role to that of an umpire......Anyone who has played baseball understands that consistency is more important for umpires than strict adherence to the rules."
Consistency is more important than strict adherence to the rules? What? Mr. Helling has been caught with his foot off of first base and is called out! He was so eager to advance to second base that his inattentiveness cost him the opportunity and he must shuffle back to the dugout.
A judge who strictly adheres to the rules, will by definition, be consistent. Let's stick to the rules.
A Falling Star, while briefly entertaining, is destined to quickly become extinguished and cease to exist.