Thursday, May 22, 2014

KAUFFMAN SCHOLARS CONTROVERSY OVER PREGNANT LADY FIRING!!!



KCTV5 has the deets on a EEOC complaint against the Kauffman Scholars, which is a program by the Kauffman Foundation designed to help inner-city students prepare for a college education.

A pregnant woman says she lost her job at a prominent Kansas City nonprofit because her bosses couldn't handle her high-risk pregnancy.

Story . . .

"She believes they retaliated against her by pulling assignments from her and creating distance between her and her co-workers. She was six months pregnant when she was told on Feb. 20 that her position was being eliminated.

She was given a few hours to get her things together and leave while her colleagues attended a staff meeting."

This one is a MUST SEE and features some rather stunning insight "the culture" of the big time agency that dominates Kansas City's non-profit scene.

Developing . . .

19 Comments:

Anonymous said...

I amgoing to take off a ton of work and you will still have t pay me or I wil sue you.

Anonymous said...

If you're going to shake somebody down, it might as well be an organization with a couple billion bucks in the bank.
Just add her to the endless list of self-identified aggrieved groups that the rest of society owes something.
Who's next?

Libtardian Philosophy At Work said...

In addition to wasting money on niggers they are also promoting abortion?
Maybe if the preggo was a lesbian they would have rolled out the red carpet and gave her daily massages, pedicures, aroma therapy, a private bath with Jacuzzi, and herbal enemas.

chuck said...

Then after years on and off the job, her stats will be lumped in with dozens of dozens of millions of other women who will become part of the "Grievance Industry" created by folks like Lynn Bratcher, whose faux cause is politically weopanized (The War On Women) by liberals. Equal Pay is part of the narrative used to destroy companies as a by product of an effort to excite the left in a phony cause.

The New Demographik will not be happy until the last for profit business in the New AmeriKa hangs up an "Going Out Of Business" sign. This "Not For Profit" is getting a dose of some Facist Medicine sans the spoon full of sugar.

In the future we wil all live in Detroit and EVERYTHING will be Single Payer.

Even the Toy Train will be free. It won't work, it will be down for repairs, it will be dangerous, but, it will be free if you have a receipt stating that you have turned in your guns.

Anonymous said...

Chuck, if you hate the bill of rights so much, maybe move to a place that shares your disgust for human rights. South Sudan, Syria, Myanmar are probably a good fit.

Jane Woodworth said...

I really want to know more about this war on women? Is it something new? Cause I recall another iteration of it.

I started working in the 2nd grade (giving out milk and cookies to get mine free). NO one told me a boy should have the job. I worked every year after that. I worked in the cafeteria, I babysat all through high school. I don't know of any boys who had got jobs babysitting. I was even allowed to dish out ice cream to hungry customers.

I went to college, I can't remember any problem being female in getting in. I can't even remember worrying about it. I certainly was allowed to work the whole time I was at college, both at the school and in the community. No one ever told me I didn't have the correct anatomy to bag groceries or wait on tables.

Of course it all changed when I got out. I needed a job. I applied to be a claims adjuster. Liberty Mutual had recently been told they had to let women be claims adjusters. Who knows if some guy was more qualified than I? But times were different so they put me in the front of the line. 2 years later I was asked to apply to be a Risk Manager in a growing software company. They wanted a woman because the 2 other people in the department were men. I have no idea how many resumes they got from qualified men. But I went straight to the front of the line.

I got into MBA school - which I truly sucked at. Some guy would probably have done better. And then I applied to law school. The fact that I was both older (by then) and a woman, guaranteed my acceptance. I couldn't hold a candle to either the men or women who were there straight out of college. They had to have much better credentials just to get accepted. I only had to be female and old. I was apparently the face of past discrimination, and clearly deserved to go to the front of the line over and over again.

I was able to get a job in a law firm during my first year - I'm pretty sure that was based on my resume, which I'm pretty sure was helped by the facts I stated above. That firm hired me out of law school and 2 years later I started my own firm. I had an awful lot of clients who wanted a female litigator because they were harder to come by. That woman thing was such a disadvantage.

So someone tell me more about this war. Cause I don't get it.

And I apologize in advance for posting my resume.

Lawyer = Vampire said...

Chuck is dead-on with the scumbag lawyer industry statement.

chuck said...

Your affective appeal to emotion by way of deflection is noted by me and your "Thought Leaders".

"Human Rights"?

Thats not just a Red Herring, it's the sign of a mind so full of gratuitous dondescension and imbued with Liberal BS that when called upon to defend the NARRATIVE the wrong line of bullshit accidentally fell out.

Reboot slave.

cml said...

7:39

What r u talking about?

Mennel Helth Sistim of KC said...

7:39 needs to report to the Prolixin® nurse immediately!

Anonymous said...

My sister was fired from a social services group after she had her baby. Everything was fine during her pregnancy and the birth and her short maternity leave. She went back to work as scheduled and when she went in she was told her position was filled by someone else when she was gone.

Anonymous said...

8:43

She needs to"Take Her Power Back" and be a "Stake Holder".

Anonymous said...

Just remember, only whores have abortions and only prostitutes need birth control!
A womans proper place is receiving her husbands seed, wherever and whenever he deems nessacary. That's why women should not work! If you do, you're keeping a good Godly man from that job.

Anonymous said...

Things were a lot better when a man could legally beat his wife as long as the rod was no bigger around than his thumb.

Anonymous said...

I'm guessing she was one of those loudmouth radical black bitches and this was a great oppourtunity to get rid of her.

Anonymous said...

10:56. Yeah, that picture that goes with the story looks just as you described. Good eyes, man. Good eyes.

Anonymous said...

Hit the bricks ya fat cow!

Anonymous said...

You sexist are hardwired.

contridiction said...

Ever notice the broads who claim their right to motherhood is being infringed upon, are usually the same ones demanding the right to abort their own children?