TKC BREAKING NEWS!!! JASON KANDER ON THE ATTACK!!! CALLING OUT SHANE SCHOELLER "NO-BID FEE OFFICE" CONTROVERSY!!!



36 days till the election . . . SO basically a month . .

Take a look at Kansas City's Jason Kander getting aggressive . . . Check it:

Jason Kander calls on Shane Schoeller to Explain How his Family’s No-Bid Fee Office Isn’t Illegal

KANSAS CITY, Mo. - Jason Kander today called on Rep. Shane Schoeller to explain to Missourians how his family business’s ownership of the Nixa fee office at the same time he was serving in the legislature does not violate Missouri’s conflict of interest laws.

The Schoeller Group managed the fee office in Nixa from 2006 until 2010. According to publicly available documents, The Schoeller Group continued to manage the Nixa fee office after Representative Schoeller was sworn into office in 2007, which appears to violate RSMO 105.456. When the process of awarding fee offices was opened up to competition instead of cronysim, The Schoeller Group lost the contract.

“Shane Schoeller may have violated Missouri law by serving in the legislature at the same time his family operated a no-bid fee office for the state,” said Rep. Jason Kander. “From all the publicly available documents, it appears that The Schoeller Group improperly managed the Nixa fee office from 2007-2010. I am calling on Representative Schoeller to release all of the documents relating to the fee office so Missourians can determine if The Schoeller Group’s management of the fee office violated state law.”


The Schoeller Group L.L.C., which was founded by Representative Schoeller and is now owned by his wife, Mendie Giles Schoeller, was awarded the Nixa Contract Office by Governor Matt Blunt - Schoeller's former boss - without a competitive bidding process in 2005. Representative Schoeller ran for and won a seat in the Missouri General Assembly in 2006, entering office on January 3, 2007.

State law (below) prohibits members of the Missouri General Assembly or their spouses from performing any service for the state that pays $1,500 a year or more unless it is part of a publicly bid contract and the legislator or their spouse was the lowest bidder. This prohibition also applies to businesses where the member or spouse own more than ten percent of the company.
As a result, on the day Representative Schoeller became a member of the Missouri House of Representatives, all of the relevant factual predicates for application of Section 105.456.2 were met:

1) Shane Schoeller was a member of the General Assembly.

2) His spouse, Mendie Giles Schoeller, owned more than 10% interest in The Schoeller Group L.L.C.

3) The Schoeller Group L.L.C. provided services to the state (operated the Nixa Fee Office) for consideration in excess of $1,500 per year.

4) The contract to operate the Nixa Fee Office was awarded without the benefit of a competitive procurement process.


Timeline of Events

October 14, 2003: Shane Schoeller files Articles of Organization with the Secretary of State’s office to start The Schoeller Group, L.L.C.

March 17, 2005: Department of Revenue informs Mendie Schoeller that she has been tentatively selected as the Contract Agent for the Nixa Fee Office.

April 12, 2005: Mendie Schoeller submits business plan for operation of Nixa Fee Office.

April 13, 2005: The Schoeller Group L.L.C.’s registered agent is changed from Shane Schoeller to Mendie Schoeller. In The Schoeller Group’s bid to keep the office in 2010, Mendie Schoeller wrote “In April 2005, sole ownership was transferred to Mendie Giles Schoeller…" No public record exists suggesting the Schoellers have separated or divorced, making this distinction meaningless as a practical matter.

January 3, 2007: Shane Schoeller is sworn in as a State Representative, making section 105.456.2 applicable to both him and his spouse, Mendie Schoeller. As of this date, because they received the Nixa Fee Office without the benefit of a competitive bid, it became illegal for Shane Schoeller, his spouse, or their LLC to continue to operate the office.

January 3, 2007 – January 6, 2010: The Schoeller Group L.L.C. operates the Nixa Contract Office in violation of section 105.456.2. In this time period, the Nixa Office processed approximately 184,298 transactions worth $612,101 in processing fees, which exceeds the $1,500 per year allowed by section 105.456.2.

January 7, 2010: Department of Revenue announces Alternative Opportunities, Inc. won the competitive bid for the Nixa office. The Schoeller Group was the only other bidder for the office.

Chapter 105

Public Officers and Employees--Miscellaneous Provisions Section 105.456

Prohibited acts by members of general assembly and statewide elected officials, exceptions. 2. No sole proprietorship, partnership, joint venture, or corporation in which a member of the general assembly, governor, lieutenant governor, attorney general, secretary of state, state treasurer, state auditor or spouse of such official is the sole proprietor, a partner having more than a ten percent partnership interest, or a coparticipant or owner of in excess of ten percent of the outstanding shares of any class of stock, shall:

(1) Perform any service for the state or any political subdivision thereof or any agency of the state or political subdivision for any consideration in excess of five hundred dollars per transaction or one thousand five hundred dollars per annum unless the transaction is made pursuant to an award on a contract let or sale made after public notice and competitive bidding, provided that the bid or offer accepted is the lowest received.
###

Comments

  1. Kander is getting desperate.

    ReplyDelete
  2. shut up Talboy

    ReplyDelete
  3. What does Kander think about unsolicited bulk e-mail?

    ReplyDelete
  4. I don't care about these kids and their election. I don't even know what they're running for nor do I care. But what kind of douchebag asks someone to defend themselves by saying, "how is this NOT illegal?"

    How about Kander shut up and explain how it IS illegal if he's so worried about it?

    News flash for Kander, the way it works in this country is its up to the accuser to prove it.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Kander is going negative even before he has spent a dime of his fortune to introduce himself? Not a good sign for Kander.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Kander is upset because Jeremy LaFever took his state rep seat and is now one of the (if not the) most powerful and well-respected politician in Kansas City. LaFever is like Pendergast but without any of Pendergast's bad qualities. LaFever is an intelligent, well spoken, and very accomplished individual who has his constitutents' interest at heart. He is precisely the type of politician we need in office. This guy left a very successful career in the private sector to run for office. We are fortunate that he made that sacrifice.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Why would you drop any political story on the same day as the first Presidential Debate?

    ReplyDelete
  8. Who has the hard-on for LaFaver?

    ReplyDelete
  9. Is it true that Jason Kander wears suits that are too small because Diana likes to cross-dress in them?

    ReplyDelete
  10. Typical crooked Republican. Good for Kander for trying to make him spill the facts.

    ReplyDelete
  11. LaFever does not buy cheap suits. Because of all the money he made as an entrepreneurial businessman in the private sector, he can afford expensive suits. LaFever is a very sharp dresser. And though he could afford to buy lots of luxury items, LaFever gives a lot of his money away to charity. A philanthropic politician. That's nice for a change.

    ReplyDelete
  12. You go, Jason!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  13. Desperate times call for desperate measures, Kander you douche.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Kander is not desperate, but he should hire LaFever.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Fees office gigs always cause trouble.

    ReplyDelete
  16. LaFever never causes trouble.

    ReplyDelete
  17. What job did Mr. LaFever do prior to politics?

    ReplyDelete
  18. Successful businessman and philanthropist.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Holy shit, this is getting rough.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Does this apply to susan Montee and the St Joe license office also?

    ReplyDelete
  21. EXCELLENT POINT!

    ReplyDelete
  22. I've got LaFever Fever. It's contagious.

    ReplyDelete
  23. LaFever should run for Lt. Governor.

    ReplyDelete
  24. 8:49 - Hold your horses. LaFever will run statewide but give him a few years to season. I agree, however, that LaFever will put Missouri back on the map. He is a true and heroic leader.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Is LaFerve the next Chris Moreno - a guy who will be obsessed about in TKC for weeks to come!?!

    ReplyDelete
  26. Wow, the lafaver campaign is hitting this website hard. Who is he? Is he from KC? What entrepreneurial job are you talking about? Kander is a lawyer from kc with a degree from Georgetown- I am not sure lafaver has done much of anything except move to kc a few years ago, get an okay job with a non profit, and start handing out signs. I don't think lafaver has a fourth of the intellectual ability of Kander.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

TKC COMMENT POLICY:

Be percipient, be nice. Don't be a spammer. BE WELL!!!

- The Management