Local newsrooms are full of scumbags: Media blackout on plan to increase Kansas City earnings tax demonstrates middle class bias of most reporters!!!



There is an effort underway to increase Kansas City's earnings tax, it's only a matter of time before the public discovers the plan already in the works. TKC reported it first.

One of my reporter buddies who constantly tips me about local newsroom gossip told me that my EXCLUSIVE STORY (!!!) yesterday made waves with one of his favorite female newsies. Timid broad that she is, she asked permission to follow-up on the news TKC broke with actual (useless) quotes and research. Her assignment editor told her: "You don't want to pay higher taxes do you?" and then gave her some pointless event to cover related to traffic or a house fire.

Unfortunately, local news organizations don't like reporting tax increases in much the same way that they shy away from covering bad economic news in general or crime in minority neighborhoods - It's depressing, people don't like watching it and the audience makes its feelings known by switching the channel. It's always safer to broadcast perv stories or investigate the important difference between Tex-Mex vs. Authentic Mexican cuisine (actual local news item yesterday).

Anyhoo . . . The fact that the media isn't too curious about the issue is one of the many signs that they can't relate to any struggle not directly impacting the middle-class and their mostly suburban audience.

Still, the plan to increase the earnings tax is solid because it's a progressive tax and the only way to make the affluent suburbanites working in this town PAY THEIR FAIR SHARE!!!

Opponents of the tax increase are probably some of the most immoral people in the Kansas City area, here's why:

  • JoCo and over-privileged people in KC don't want any of the white elephants cut, they are raising hell over proposed cutbacks to The Zoo, all of the empty museums and Liberty Memorial.

  • These are the same JoCo people who want Kansas City and Jackson County to pay for the Stadiums but would reject a bi-state increase overwhelmingly - They did last time around.

  • Rather than skimp on any of this town's amenities - WHICH THEY DON'T PAY FOR - JoCo and suburbanites from around the area want the people of Kansas City to lose out on services that would undoubtedly decline if Funkhouser carries out his massive City Hall purge.

  • Put simply, this is yet another way in which JoCo people and suburbanites want Kansas City to pay for their entertainment . . . This time at the cost of City Hall jobs. Of course, more affluent people in Kansas City proper are also averse to paying higher taxes because they would be paying more and they are seldom reliant on the same City Services which are more frequently doled out to po'folk.

    The answer to this dilemma that the local media has disseminated is either silence or straight out contempt.

    Yael T. Abouhalkah is nothing more than Funkhouser's cheerleader at The Star and he not only casually dismisses the impending cuts to City services and THE PEOPLE WHO MIGHT LOSE THEIR JOBS at City Hall but also doesn't mention an earnings tax increase which is the most effective and immediate solution to the current budget crunch.

    Similarly, Channel 9 has went on record in opposition to any tax increase.

    The bias here is obvious and City Hall employees, po'folk and people relying on City Services will predictably suffer the most at the hands of corporate media. In this situation, as in most others, the tenure of Mayor Funkhouser has revealed that he was never serious about his campaign promises and he has consistently worked against Kansas City's poor and minority communities in order to support his popularity in the suburbs while maintaining the status quo.

    Comments

    1. Go get'em T.

      Way to keep the reporters in this town honest.

      ReplyDelete
    2. Whenever I bring my rich, white, JoCo ass to your crap ass town to spend money on beers, then I support your horribly run municipality. You're lucky that JoCo hasn't created anything comparable so that I can stop going there.

      ReplyDelete
    3. hey, i wanna see tony post a picture of his own manboobs...what's the deal? maybe he can post a picture of himself in a thong. or how about his fat-mouth mom? all things being equal, of course...

      ReplyDelete
    4. So now you're for higher taxes Tony?

      I don't understand, you didn't support the Stadium Tax or any other tax in recent memory.

      ReplyDelete
    5. You're really trying your best to make a tax debate interesting jerko.

      Give it up. This town's money is fucked and I'm not jerking wit cha.

      ReplyDelete
    6. Uh, actually, not only do we also pay the 1% for working in KCMO, but we also get taxed by MO and KS for working in KCMO. So our fair share is being paid.

      ReplyDelete
    7. Tony will always want more.

      ReplyDelete
    8. Study shows that city earnings tax actually drains your area of affluence. No problem, I suppose, if your Tony. More "po folk" to defend on his blog:

      "The cross-state evidence indicates that a city with a one-percent earnings tax rate will, on average, have a five-percentage-point lower city-to-MSA income ratio than a city with no earnings tax. Thus, the evidence points to a substantial relocation occurring in those cities that adopt an earnings tax.

      The economics is quite straightforward. By adopting an earnings tax, a city gives businesses and residents an incentive to locate production outside the city. People go where they will obtain the highest after-tax return on their labor or investments. In order to raise the return, people locate more productive capacity outside the city limits in order to avoid the tax burden.

      This incentive effect can account for why the city share of per capita income is smaller in cities with earnings taxes than without."

      --"How an earnings tax harms cities like St. Louis and Kansas City". From the Show Me Institute's website:
      http://showmeinstitute.org/docLib/200704111_smi_study_11.pdf

      ReplyDelete
    9. peachiegirlie you made me throw up my taco when you told tony to post a pic of his mom in a thong. please dont post that

      ReplyDelete
    10. peachiegirlie you made me throw up my taco when you told tony to post a pic of his mom in a thong. please dont post that

      ReplyDelete
    11. Why do so many people in KC "rely" on these "social services" from city hall? I root for the underdog, am extremely sympathetic to the working class (I can't stress working enough), and love KC, yet I would oppose the tax because KCMO has proved time and time again that they do not know how to effectively use tax $$ wisely (ie. TIF, Funky's trip to China).

      ReplyDelete
    12. Yeah, no more money for Shoe-less Gloria. She has taken enough.

      ReplyDelete
    13. The earnings tax is not a progressive tax you moron. Currently, it is 1% of income earned. It does not change based on your income.

      Why do you keep saying that affluent suburbanties should pay their fair share....THEY ARE! you retard. All those leeches that live off the city services are the ones who pay nothing.

      I made a living for myself from scratch, so can they. Why do you insist that those who work hard to earn a good living should be rewarded by ponying up more of their money to degenerates of this city.

      For CHRIST SAKE Tony, you have a City Manager who is ripping off the residents by the tune of millions of dollars and you want suburbanites to pay more?

      Perhaps we should petition to have our nice wealthy neighborhoods annexed into Liberty and let them manage our services.

      You're such a big man titty putz

      ReplyDelete
    14. Don't forget. The only reason Tony wants this tax is so his anti-Funkhouser sources will remain employed and continue to feed him stories from City Hall.

      I'm done with KC, MO if this earnings tax increases. Study after study shows these taxes do nothing but promote further sprawl by pushing the middle class out to the suburbs (and this includes me).

      ReplyDelete
    15. Tony

      You post this picture of this woman wrapped in this newspaper periodically and it gives me lift off. Who is she and where did you get this photo.

      I didn't read the rest of your post after the photo, so I don't know what it says. I'm sure you're right.

      ReplyDelete
    16. That's Sienna Miller. It's probably from some magazine.

      ReplyDelete

    Post a Comment

    TKC COMMENT POLICY:

    Be percipient, be nice. Don't be a spammer. BE WELL!!!

    - The Management