Saturday, February 16, 2019

Double Talk: Kansas Congresswoman Sharice Davids Votes For Border Wall Funding Compromise Despite Her Previous Opposition

VERY IMPORTANT fact check and update on the rookie Rep. just a bit behind the curve when it comes to vague political language that keeps our elected officials making return trips to the nation's capital. Take a look:

Davids votes for border wall funding

Earlier this month, U.S. Rep. Sharice Davids said she would not vote for border wall money. But she voted for the bill.

20 comments:

Anonymous said...


Maybe it's because of my e-mail. Her people stand on every street corner ranting how the white man stole their country but yet they want an open boarder. It makes sense she would want a wall that's what their beef has been all along, right.

Anonymous said...

Kind of hard to know if she actually understands what she voted for. She wasn't elected for brains or any other real qualification.

Anonymous said...

When she was asked why sh voted as she did she looked at the reporter and said, "I voted on something?"

Anonymous said...

Deer in the headlights.

Anonymous said...

I wrote her a letter saying I wanted her to support it. She replied, OK.

Anonymous said...

The walking diversity check box faces a dilemma in government.

Anonymous said...

It's okay, untwist 'em fellahs - this vote means nothing except that the Government is going to keep running - Mexico is going to pay for the Wall, remember?

Anonymous said...

I thought Dems wanted open borders? That's what I read on here and my overlords tell me to think on Fox. Have I been bullshitted?

Anonymous said...

^^^^ no, you’re just stupid

Anonymous said...

10:16 yeah, the so-called 'Native Americans' love to talk about White People atrocities right up until the conversation moves to the atrocities natives were committing on each other long before the Whites landed here and suddenly the topic changes...

Anonymous said...

Is Angela K ok with Sharice’s decision? She’s Sharice’s chief dingleberry.

NicK Beach said...

because she is a phony

Anonymous said...

This was a smart vote for the freshman legislator. Maybe she’s not such a lightweight after all. Try and collect some federal dollars for broke-ass kck please! Compromise with the administration in order to funnel pork projects here. If she strikes a conciliatory tone she may have a future. It was Dennis Moore’s seat before so a Democrat can make a home here.
-Radish

Anonymous said...

She's being schooled every day that Democrats march in (goose) step. If she ever wants to have a committee assignment she will do as she's told.

Anonymous said...

Radish:
Davids couldn't carry Dennis Moore's socks.
But giver her a break. A week has seven whole days and it's really really hard to try to keep track of all those things.
She's a terrible embarrassment and it will only get worse as time goes on.
Fortunately, the voters of the Kansas 3rd District will have to suffer just a bit less than two years and Davids will be long gone.
The gravity of stupidity and plain old common sense will prevail.
Facts are stubborn things.

Anonymous said...

Mommy! Buy me another coffeshop! Not everyone is constantly celebrating my awesome diversity anymore!

Anonymous said...

The real money is the National Emergency money - is she going to go after Trump for that?

Anonymous said...

She voted to fund border security and ICE, proving the trolls wrong about her positions.

So now that she has taken a reasonable vote, the only thing left is to insult her gender and mock her race and heritage.

Keep it up guys and she's going to win by 9 points again.

Anonymous said...

The mere ,mention of her or AOC triggers the snowflake incel cult45 members on here. Every single time it works. Keep it up TKC, it is hilarious to read comments from 50 year old virgins on here.

Anonymous said...

What's hilarious is what's in AOC's wacky Green New Deal. For added humor, watch how Pelosi continues to smash the Junior Communista club flat when they step out of line.

No one who is so hate-obsessed about Trump, or is so desperate to create strawmen describing people that disagree with the increasingly radical left, has any business talking about triggers. ;)