The Star Snubs Latino Veterans



Let’s start this post with a little background . . . This is a joke site. Nearly every day I scan KC headlines and make fun of the news. Sometimes I make people laugh, sometimes I annoy them and every so often I offend. But I frequently caution that readers shouldn’t take anything on this blog too seriously. The same can’t be said of KC’s daily newspaper.

Recently, The Star featured a photograph of Mexican-American Veterans with the caption, “Oh Say Can You See.” Undoubtedly, this was an allusion to a lame grade school joke about a kid going to a baseball game and sitting on top of a flag pole:

A kid named Jose goes to the ballgame without a ticket. When he gets there, the tickets are sold out. He sneaks in and climbs the flagpole and watches the game from there. When he gets home his dad says "How was the game?" Jose says "Fine, Dad, but I had to sit on the flagpole because I didn't have a ticket." "Could you see from up there?" "Oh ya. Everybody was nice about it, too. They all turned around and said 'Jose can you see?'" (Link)

Clearly, some bored caption writer at The Star believes that Mexican-American Veterans deserve to be honored with juvenile humor rather than respect.

This offhanded caption is telling in much the same way that drunken remarks often reveal true feelings. This snide caption says (in so many words) that even Latinos who have served this country are to be regarded with no more distinction than any other Hispanic with a commonplace name.

The caption writer might have been more honest if he or she would have simply written, “They all look the same to me.” And in the end, this sentiment is all too representative of The Star’s boilerplate, fill in the blank coverage regarding local Latinos. Latinos in KC are either portrayed as being somehow involved in a hat dance or they are the subject of sappy reports regarding the hardships of undocumented workers. Ironically, the typical neglect of local Latino issues in the pages of The Star is almost welcome when faced with their stereotypical reporting.

Still, a question lingers in my mind: Am I being too sensitive about this off handed slight? Then I think that there’s no way that The Star would publish something similar to this regarding African-American Veterans. And even more than thirty years down the line, making a local white Vet angry will earn you a face full of tobacco juice. No, The Star should know better and their careless snub of Mexican-American Veterans is indicative of their shoddy coverage of KC’s Latino community.

There is more to Latinos in KC than Cinco De Mayo and the restaurants on the Boulevard but you wouldn’t know this by reading the The Star. Dos Mundos and The KC Hispanic News provide the only real insight into the lives of local Latinos but that kind of ghettoization still leaves the larger readership of The Star with gross misconceptions regarding an ever increasing segment of KC’s population.

Time and again The Star has failed to provide decent coverage of Kansas City’s minority communities. Their failures are made clear not only with a one-sided outsider's view regarding people of color in this town but also with their ineptness in dealing with topics in which race plays a factor.

Every now and then The Star makes half-hearted gestures at inclusion. However, looking at the new multi-million dollar facility that will soon house the publication it’s clear that providing decent reporting on all of KC’s citizens is not nearly as much of a priority as maintaining a local news monopoly.

But still, there’s a chance that The Star will claim ignorance. The caption writer may contend that the reference was unintentional. In any event, my complaints stand. Let The Star prove their concern for KC’s Latino community with more local Latinos employed in their offices and a more accurate view of the Latino community in their pages. Until this city’s largest daily paper offers a more thorough view of the people of color in this town, the only joke worth laughing at is their coverage.

Comments

  1. I think you might be reading too much into something that might not be there. It’s like something I wrote before where old words and sayings are lost to today’s youth. How many white twenty-one year olds do you think know that picininny is a black slur or why some older black people won’t get caught dead eating fried chicken in a Denny’s? Do you really think some young reporter really knew the racial meaning behind “oh say can you see”? I know what you’re saying but don’t look for shit that’s not there? Otherwise I got your back on everything

    ReplyDelete
  2. In all honesty, I'd never heard that joke before today. That, of course, doesn't mean that the caption writer at the Star doesn't know the joke, but ...

    I think you make a valid point about the Star's coverage of Latinos and I hope that posts like this force them to think about what they're writing (or what they're NOT writing).

    ReplyDelete
  3. Tony, Tony, Tony...

    Calm down man.

    Granted, the Stars coverage of Latinos isn't the most flattering at times, but I think you're reading too much into this.

    Latino Veterans... the first line of the first stanza of the National Anthem... I see it as patriotic. Yeah, I've heard the joke before, but I didn't think of that when I saw the picture and caption. Then again, I'm not Latino.

    I look for lots of hidden agendas, but I don't see one there.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Dude, I gotta agree with death and the others, you might be assuming too much. The headline writer probably doesn't even know about that joke. The Star has some of the cheesiest headlines around, so I could see them writing this for anything related to the flag, patriotism, military, etc. I think you give the Star too much credit to assume that they did this on purpose.

    A couple of weeks ago I had a conversation with someone about the phrase "Jew them down" in regards to negotiating with a used car salesman. She was a smart, well-educated liberal who had no idea the phrase was anti-Semitic. At first she didn't even believe it was spelled J-E-W, she insisted it was J-O-O.

    Anyway, I love me a good conspiracy theory and I usually don't mind hatin' on the local media - but I just don't see anything nefarious in this case.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I hope you also emailed your post about the Star's photo caption to their reader rep (for as much good as that will do....but they should at least have to respond to you).

    I hadn't heard the joke before, so I wouldn't have made the connection. (Then again, I didn't know what a lawn jockey was until my roommate was surprised at seeing one in a real estate photo online.)

    I think you tie the connection--and it's obvious that there at least is one, whether or not it was intentional/conscious--in well to valid points about their coverage.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I'm with Mustang. Doesn't really matter what a particular individual will read into that headline -- The Star believes itself a major metropolitan publication, and the headline should have never made it to print. Someone should have caught it.

    But -- and let me apologize in advance for my common language; I just don't have the energy for tact today -- it's a cracker rag. It's written by Midwestern crackers for Midwestern crackers, and expecting any kind of cultural diversity (or sensitivity even) from it is, well, like my mother always said, "wish in one hand, shit in the other; see which one fills up faster."

    It's just not gonna happen. It's one of the whitest, blandest papers I've ever encountered. Its vision is almost incomparably narrow. Viva la JOCO!

    Reecie

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

TKC COMMENT POLICY:

Be percipient, be nice. Don't be a spammer. BE WELL!!!

- The Management