An interesting anonymous e-mail: > Within the political machine of Jackson County lies > a dirty little secret that no one ever wants to talk > about. What is it? That ballot tampering is alive > and well, and may perhaps come into play on April > 4th. > > The Proof is Out There > > How can one prove that ballot tampering has > occurred? More on that in a moment. > > First, some background. > > The Kansas City portion of Jackson County still > uses punch card ballots. While most other election > boards in Missouri have long ago made the switch to > more accurate systems, the April 4th election in > Jackson County will be the last such election to use > this outdated system. In Florida in the year 2000, > there was an outcry for better systems after heavy > Democratic precincts found their many of their > ballots cast were difficult to count. > > Why hasn’t a similar outcry been made in the heavy > Democratic areas of Kansas City? > > Quite simply, because punch card ballots are easy > to tamper with and most likely, certain powerful > political insiders, like it that way. > > How to Tamper with a Punch Card Ballot > > In the punch card system, if a person punches two > holes on the same question or office, the vote is > not counted and the ballot is labeled as a > “discard.” You can only punch one hole per election > item. > > Now, say a person has a stack of ballots cast, > that have yet to be counted and let’s say they want > person A to win over person B. By using a long > stick pin or other similar device, the tamperer > would run the pin through the stack right where the > hole for person A would be punched. Any ballot that > had already been marked for person A would be > unaffected, but any ballot that had been marked for > person B would now have two holes punched, making > the ballot now a “discard.” > > Obviously, a tamperer wouldn’t do this to all of a > precinct’s ballots, that would raise obvious > suspicion, but a few ballots here, a few ballot > there, who will notice, right? > > The Devil is in the Data > > Let’s draw this to a close. Tampering evidence > can be found by looking for precincts that have an > abnormally high rate of “discards”. For example, > let’s say 19 out of 20 precincts have a 1% rate of > discards, but for some reason, the remaining > precinct has a 3% rate of discards. This would be > statistical evidence of tampering, since all > precincts are using the exact same equipment and > procedures. > > This evidence exists in the data from previous > Kansas City, Jackson County elections. Certain > precincts consistently report abnormally high rates > of discards. > > Will tampering come into play on April 4th? > > What do you think? > > Why are there more people registered to vote than > there are people of voting age living in Jackson > County?