Monday, November 27, 2017

New York Times Announces Upcoming Kansas Comeback To Talk Deadly Hate Crimes

Let's not forget that this year started off with a bang and some dude targeting minorities whilst shouting alt-right campaign rhetoric. Accordingly, the New York Times is on its way back to JoCo in order to continue the conversation about real world hateration and its impact. Take a look:

A Reporter Returns to Kansas to Discuss Hate Crimes and Identity

During the summer, The Times published my story on the life of Sunayana Dumala, whose husband was killed in February. An Indian immigrant, Srinivas Kuchibhotla was fatally shot and his friend wounded at a neighborhood bar by a man who witnesses said screamed racial slurs and demanded to know their immigration status.

23 Comments:

Indian Creek Hate Crime Victims said...

Huh..., no follow up here?

Anonymous said...

Indian creek was a mass murder race crime and where’s The NY Times at on this one?

Anonymous said...

What about the 5 people killed at 129th and Wornall in a Black on White race hate crime just 2 years ago?

Oh..., sorry, they are white victims.

Anonymous said...

Killa city, the hot bed of race crimes, it’s probably 1000 times worse in ny. Are they gonna speak about the black on white hate crimes or just another blame whitey for everything report

Jeffery Flanagan said...

Well, since you asked, here is what is going on in New York in 2009.

No stats from Bill Deblowsio since then that I can find.

Here are the crime data that Progressives doesn’t want people to know: blacks committed 66 percent of all violent crimes in the first half of 2009 (though they were only 55 percent of all stops and only 23 percent of the city’s population). Blacks committed 80 percent of all shootings in the first half of 2009. Together, blacks and Hispanics committed 98 percent of all shootings. Blacks committed nearly 70 percent of all robberies. Whites, by contrast, committed 5 percent of all violent crimes in the first half of 2009, though they are 35 percent of the city’s population (and were 10 percent of all stops). They committed 1.8 percent of all shootings and less than 5 percent of all robberies. The face of violent crime in New York, in other words, like in every other large American city, is almost exclusively black and brown. Any given violent crime is 13 times more likely to be committed by a black than by a white perpetrator.

I am still dead in a black on white hate crime that the media and Progressives want you to forget while they wail and gnash their teeth over Emmit Till.

You're welcomd.

Anonymous said...

The guy thought they were Iranians, which would have made the hate justifiable. It’s not his fault.

Anonymous said...

Hey chuck, where did you steal this from?

Anonymous said...

7:56, unless you were born with knowledge beyond how to suckle, everything you know (or in your case, think you know) came from some other source. It does not matter whether somebody else made the point before you; it only matters whether it is true or not true. Knee jerk ad hominems aside, do you have data, information or a rational argument that contradict the post? Hint: remarks that include "geezer" and/or "pants shitting" do not qualify as rational arguments.

Anonymous said...

Kansas is a shit-hole. Filled with rural idiot geezers who have more guns than common sense. Anyone with an IQ over 60 and more than two teeth, has long since vacated that God forsaken waste land. All that's left are comic-book villains like Scamin' Sammy, Candy-ass Kobach, and the blunder twins the Koch brothers. The people that live there deserve to live there. They couldn't function anywhere else. They need to be quarantined there for life.

Anonymous said...

@8:20-the problem with being a thief of others work is that everything you post is to be taken with a grain of salt. In other words-you're "Fake news." Every little statistic, every gratuitous phrase, and every redundant word you post is in essence a lie. What matters is that you and everything you write is fake. Call that an "ad hominem" attack if you will, but if the shoe fits chuck...wear it.

Anonymous said...

^^^^^^Are you really that fucking stupid?

Anonymous said...

I have two guns. You have zero balls. I fuck women. You suck dick.

Anonymous said...

^^You are also and uneducated moron, likely living in a trailer, and broke as fuck. But we gathered that from your post.

Anonymous said...

8:38, that shoe does not fit. And you make no sense. Even a comment that is copied verbatim from some other source is accurate if the source is accurate. Statistics taken from somewhere else (which most are) have no more or less validity than in the original work. That being understood, and with specific reference to the post that so displeased you: prove any part of it wrong.

Anonymous said...

Don't piss off Chuck Stalker, or he'll grab a pistol and go full Mark Devid Chapman on your ass.

Anonymous said...

Who is Mark Devid Chapman? Poor Chuck, in here talking to himself again.

Anonymous said...

Doesn't the New York Times have their own crimes to investigate? Go home yanky fucks.

Anonymous said...

He said Yanky, holy fucking shit I hope that no one is actually that dumb.

Anonymous said...

Poor Chuck Stalker 4:34, he really is delusional and ignorant.

chuck said...

You ignorant Progressive Parasite piece of shit.

I worked 10 hours today, just got on the computer.

All day long, you have held conversations with yourself you dumb fuckin piece of parasitic filth.


Fuck you Anonymous, Progressive, white, liberal cunts.

Anonymous said...

Maybe if you had amounted to something other than a worthless piece of racist white-trash chuck, you wouldn’t have had to work 10 hours today!

Anonymous said...

Obviously the New York Times is well aware of the FACT that we don't have a newspaper in KC. Unfortunately you can bet at least 25,000 people in New York City used the "N" word yesterday and the Times didn't have a single thing to report on that.

Anonymous said...

Chuck Stalker 8:04 is the KC version of Byron - an inbred mooching moron.