Sunday, September 18, 2016

Show-Me Missouri Democratic Party Super Minority Veto Session Debriefing



Xenia Deli inspires a quick look back at the veto session according to our favorite Missouri Super-Minorty . . . 2nd favorite if we're counting Filipinos . . .

Missouri House Democrats: LEGISLATURE OVERRIDES ANOTHER 13 NIXON VETOES

Missourians could soon need government-issued photo identification to exercise their constitutional right to vote. Carrying a concealed firearm, however, will require no documentation whatsoever.

Imposing new legal barriers to voting while further easing the state’s already lax laws on the possession and use of guns topped the agenda of the Missouri General Assembly’s annual veto on Sept. 14, but the Republican-dominated legislature took one final opportunity to run up the score against Gov. Jay Nixon, a Democrat who is leaving office after his final term ends in January, by overriding 13 of his vetoes from earlier this year.

Nixon has been prolific in exercising the veto power during his nearly eight years as governor, rejecting a total of 159 bills. While Nixon was overridden just twice in his first term, Republicans have held veto-proof majorities in both legislative chambers for most of his second, which resulted in another 47 bill overrides, for 49 total. Overrides require 23 votes in the Senate and 109 in the House of Representatives.

Despite pleas from Missouri law enforcement groups that it would put the lives of both officers and the public in danger, Republicans overruled Nixon’s rejection of legislation that will allow Missourians to carry concealed firearms without a permit – or undergoing the safety training and background checks currently required to get one. The measure, Senate Bill 656, also makes it easier to invoke self-defense as a legal justification for using deadly force, along with numerous other changes to gun laws.

Although Republicans overrode the veto on the photo voter ID measure, House Bill 1631, it won’t actually become law unless Missouri voters approve a companion constitutional amendment later this fall. GOP lawmakers have been seeking to impose a photo voter ID requirement for a decade as a means of suppressing Democratic voters but have been thwarted by a 2006 Missouri Supreme Court decision holding that such a requirement violates the voting rights provision of the state constitution.

Amendment 6 on the Nov. 8 statewide ballot asks voters to grant lawmakers the constitutional power to impose a photo voter ID requirement. There has never been a reported case of voter impersonation fraud in Missouri, which is the only type of fraud a photo ID requirement could prevent. However, key Democratic constituencies, including racial and ethnic minorities, are among the groups most likely to not have a photo ID. As a result, a photo ID requirement could disenfranchise thousands of legally registered, and mostly Democratic, voters . . .
###############

There's more . . . Read the rest of it here . . .

You decide . . .

5 Comments:

Anonymous said...

No of this repetitive barking matters. No matter what the law or constitutional amendment actually says the libtard and crooked ass state supreme court will change anything they wish any way they wish. Libtards have no respect for the will of the people unless it serves their agenda. Jesus, surely the minorities are at least smart enough to figure that out.

Anonymous said...

We're smart enough to know that Republicans hate us.

Silvestor orgalthorp said...

"Suppressing democratic voters"?????
So only democrats must show a photo ID?
I forgot, the argument against voter ID is that only democrats are too stupid or incapable to get one

Anonymous said...

TOP PHOTO

I entered a Deli through the rear once and got the best seat in the house!!!

Anonymous said...

Don't people have to have ID to exercise their constitutional right to buy a firearm? Is that why downtown blacks buy theirs on the black market?