NEW YORK TIMES DENOUNCES GUN RIGHTS 656 BILL VETO OVERRIDE AND CALLS MISSOURI: THE SHOOT-ME STATE!!!
MUST READ from the nation's paper of record offers a SCATHING critique of this week's statehouse defense of 2nd Amendment rights against arbitrary crackdowns . . . While we may not agree, it's always good to be acknowledged. Take a peek from a safe distance: Missouri: The Shoot-Me State
Well who the fuck is the New York Times other than a pack of left wing millennial shit heels wishing they were significant? Other than Tony and a few aspiring wannabe journalist nobody gives a rats ass what opinion oozes out of some freaking news rag. Perhaps the New York Times should concentrate on why enforcement of their strict gun laws has been a complete failure over the past decade. Perhaps the pussy brats at NYT should scrutinize the failures of NYC to account for the money they have wasted criminalizing honest citizens and accomplishing NO significant reductions in violent crimes. Perhaps the NYT should work as hard influencing their local libtard crony politicians rather than piss and moan about Missouri where the melting pot shit heads have no influence whatsoever.
ReplyDeleteI would fuck the Grey Lady in her ass and come on her tits.
ReplyDeleteThen I would shoot the cunt.
Just be happy with shooting your wad
DeleteNew York Times has influence in Kansas City only on New Years Eve. The rest of the year people be like.... Who?
ReplyDeleteIt was stupid. Bitching about the NYT won't change that.
ReplyDeleteWhat the times was afraid to say was that it was motivated by racial fear/hatred.
It is motivated by racial realism, fool.
ReplyDeleteThe Times is loathe to recognize the gigantic negro problem here and what measures must be taken to resolve the issue.
it'll be a non-event in practice.
ReplyDeleteThe 800 pound gorilla in the room on this issue are the 200 to 300 pound gorillas roaming American cities carrying guns.
ReplyDeleteWe are off the fucking rails when we start allowing carry without any requirement for training.
ReplyDeleteNothing to do with 2nd A., and everything to do with common sense.
This from a ex-bartender that has seen way too much of the human condition.
Hey bartender give me another drink
DeleteIf you haven't had any training, have never been in the military, are not comfortable with firearms or firearms safety you would be off the rails to fuck with a firearm. However, there are millions of veterans, ex cops, retired Feds, well practiced, experienced shooters and others who can do pretty damn well without being forced to pay some certified dip shit to explain where not to point a gun, how to used a safety, a decocker and when to shoot a shit heel.
ReplyDeleteI agree to the extent that if you don't know what you are doing leave guns alone, but then folks generally don't gravitate towards things where they have no interest in learning about them. A dumb ass who should not possess a gun will generally manage to shoot his own ass and/or disrupt his gene pool so I'm not getting too damn hormonal about this aspect. Now some nappy headed cracked up motherfucker in a sloppy ass 96 Olds? That guy is a thug and it is already illegal for him to have a gun.
Unfortunately the libtards have been so worried about thier pastor getting his hands on a gun and shooting his thumb off they have totally ignored going after the active felons cruising the streets with firearms who should never have a gun. You would think a mayor who believes that law abiding citizens will make the streets more dangerous would have pushed to get the illegal guns off the streets and there just isn't much of an initiative in KC to stop law breaking by the yard apes.
I guess I just don't grasp the logic of how spending years doing little to nothing about violent criminals with guns results in havoc that is only created by honest folks with guns. The science behind the conclusion only convinces me more that the real dumb ass in all this is the mayor himself.