MUST READ!!! ANONYMOUS XIX BREAKS DOWN DR. MELINDA COLEMAN'S SUNSHINE LAW DEMAND AND VOW TO KEEP FIGHTING!!!



TKC Note: Kansas City mainstream media is scuttling coverage of the Maryville Daisy Rape Aftermath but KICK-ASS INTERNETS DENZIENS keep us apprised of their take on the ensuing drama. Check it:

Dr. Melinda Coleman's Latest . . .

The latest from Melinda Coleman. It seems she has moved her media circus to the UK. Anonymous has ventured into a couple of rape cases in the past few years. This one may be the last. Many, old school Anons, myself included are beginning to think Melinda Coleman's has some serious mental issues. Losing her husband, then the issue with her daughter, the scorn from a community, the isolation, the house burning, now the suicide and the latest is Melinda Coleman seems seriously ill. We are not convinced this isn't a ploy to garner publicity. Something we suggested in late October to no avail.

We have a number of chat logs with Coleman where we caught her in lies so now it looks like this whole event was about a girl not wanting to face the wrath of a psycho mom. Highway Patrol reported that Daisy slid off the road and wrecked her Hummer. Then suddenly she tried to commit suicide. Several people said on social media wrote that they had seen her and she was fine. Once again, was she afraid of what "psycho mom" would do to her?

Something stinks here. The video of Matthew Barnett *boinking* her daughter doesn't prove anything unless she was screaming stop, don't do this. Eyewitness accounts, and police reports don't back up that contention. Many feel for Coleman, her daughter, and her family but also are beginning to believe she is "bat shit nuts". Stay tuned..........

AnonymousXIX
#############

Reference:

UK Daily Mail: 'I'm not finished fighting, not at all': Daisy Coleman's mother vows to use 'sunshine law' to prove daughter's alleged rapist was cleared for political reasons

Comments

  1. I personally don't care if she was mentally retarded ... you don't take a child... let me say that again ... you do not take a child and use her for sex. everyone is splitting hairs on this issue and Jean being a woman should be ashamed of herself for "cutting a deal" with what would be considered a "grown man" for having sex with a child, it doesnt matter if she was heard screaming "your hitting that spot big daddy! go deeper!" she was an under aged child and he had sex with her .. he should be on the predators list and sitting in a prison cell... to say that because she was to drunk to remember is not a defense for not prosecuting, this is right up there with "we couldnt charge the revrund because he wont cooperate and tell us where the money is" or "we're not going to charge him with drug possession because its going to be legal eventually" this is a town without any law any longer ... shame on you fucking animals and I hope for those of you that condone this that something very similar happens in your life.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I'll skip this one

    ReplyDelete
  3. Kids are off limits, even if they look older.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Mom's a publicity seeking ho.

    ReplyDelete
  5. @10:31 so her child is fair game to be raped? what the fuck is wrong with you? I would be a publicity ho too if I wasn't getting justice, first they use the mentality of she was passed out so theres no real evidence that she said "no" ... she's a baby you fucking animal, she's under age and cant make that decision where an adult is concerned... what a mental dysfunctional retard you are making a comment like that ... just because you don't like a person doesn't give their "Rights" any less value, if that were the case you shouldn't have any at all

    ReplyDelete
  6. Finally, an entry with 4 out of the first five comments being thoughtful and reasoned. OMG.

    The cum guy and 4 racists must have slept in today.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Daisy's a victim, but shouldn't someone ask why she had access to booze and was so unsupervised as to be out all night? In short, where was grizzly mom when all this happened?

    ReplyDelete
  8. Grizzly Mom was to busy promoting her new hot sexy bikini body and tats to notice her 13 year old daughter was dressing up like she was auditioning for girls gone wild or maxim magazine and posting the pics on Facebook for the entire community to see and sneaking out of the house when she wasn't noticing to hangout without jackass boys with IQ's of about 20.

    It's really quite simple to see.

    ReplyDelete
  9. @10:51 couldn't the same be asked about where were the parents at the house where the party took place? who bought the alcohol? what liquor store sold it to them? where was the supervision at the house where the rape took place? all good questions but I think the better question is "where were this girls rights to not be raped?" when she was intoxicated with alcohol given to her by older people and what about the other girl that was also raped .. the witness? what about her? you see...everyone is more concerned about why this child's parents weren't there than jean peters letting a man walk on rape of a minor and if you don't view this as wrong, maybe you need to have a look at your child or grandchild and ask yourself if its okay. This is why KC is what it is today... there is no fair treatment under the law anymore here ... and we let these cancers run our cities anyway they like and do nothing and say nothing about it

    ReplyDelete
  10. The bottom line said: Young ladies don't put yourself in a position to be compromised. Sin will take you farther than you want to go, leave you longer than you want to stay and cost you more than you want to pay.

    ReplyDelete
  11. High level politics in Missouri and Kansas are about backroom deals. That's a fact.

    Promises of support and funds to ambitious attorneys and friendly judges are common practice.

    If you find yourself on the other side of this group, it works on your mind and health.

    To a point you act crazy. You know the truth, but no one will help you. If this were your daughter, and these bought and paid for political hacks did little or nothing, how would you respond?

    The facts; support for future election or re-elections for attorneys and judges know the game plan and rule accordingly.

    No money or power, you're screwed.

    ReplyDelete
  12. The victim & her mother have been tried & found guilty. Nothing new here. It happens all the time.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Daisy is a slut. Her Mom is crazy. And that guy who fucked het made her cum hard.

    End of story.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Carl, Mission Hills1/12/14, 12:08 PM

    Ok most you people are acting like idiots and here's why. First too many different people who are in charge of charging people with breaking the law and dealing with these charges have all came to the same point of thought here. No evidence no charges. Hell even the Missouri Highway Patrol also pointed that out. That Barnett boy was charged with the one law he did for sure break. But remember they were all kids no matter how you want to look at it. Plus the mother and the daughter said they were fine with the charges being brought up. Now if you whiners don’t like that, then go have a word with the mother. Now a week later they are not happy with the charges. All they had to do was say no but as one can see they didn't. Maybe mom and daughter don't understand what the word no means till later on when they change their minds. But as I have said many times and will say many more times. "How come no parents were charged with anything?" Look at how many parents was involved with this case. Look at how many kids was a part of this case. And not a one parent has been made to answer to anything. You know the more this goes on and the more actions I see of mom and daughter I am beginning to see a child 13 or not who just might have been saying, “Hell yes let’s get drunk and damn I want me some dick.” Harsh as that may sound it happens every day all across this country. You ever stop and think how many kids go out at night under age 18 wanting to get laid? You might just be surprised at how many of those kids are girls as well. So all you complainers sitting on your asses screaming about this case I ask, "What about all the cases that happen every week you don't hear about, or are they not important?" What about all the 13 year old girls and boys out there having sex all the time? Nobody is dragging those kids into court. I remember many kids in Jr High having sex and that wasn't all that many years ago. None of them did jail time. The right charges was made in this case and you who think not then need to start in your own neighborhoods trying to change what is happening under your own eye's if these kind of things bother you that much. The events of that night was all so wrong by many people but remember they was kids and kids do stupid things, that’s why us adults are suppose to be teaching them. And if we fail at that then maybe the courts need to deal with us for being piss poor parents.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Tony I am so god damn tired of seeing Byron Funkhouser’s shit on these posts all the time. He is ruining your site. He is not from around here and adds nothing to this local blog. His insight is hateful as a rule and does not reflect the views of people or events of Kansas City. He has gotten to the point he only posts to incite and anger people for his own benefit.

    ReplyDelete
  16. I have to keep saying it is not illegal in MO for a 17 year old and a 14 year old to have sex! It is not stat rape under the law. Period. The only issue here was consent.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Carl makes many great points and some that made even me stop and think about only because he is right and I for one have chosen to ignore what is really happening in our world today. So in that case I am in a way guilty of not looking out for our children today. People such as Byron yell nothing but hatred as a means to dealing with the issue instead of as Carl said getting off his ass and starting to do something about it in his own neighborhood. I doubt people such as Byron would do such. It’s easier to avoid the real issue and instead mouth off statements of hate rather than trying to act like he is a real man with concerns who will put forth some effort.

    ReplyDelete
  18. 12:29 I'm no law professor but I do believe you are right the point that many bring up is the alcohol point. But wasn't there another question over rather Daisy was drinking at home with her friend while mother was in the house prior to sneaking out? So at that point was not the mother breaking the law? Carl is right why wasn't the mom charged with that? Who did the kids get the booze from?

    ReplyDelete
  19. Follow Melinda Mueller Coleman on Facebook for some enlightenment...you will then understand where "bat shit crazy" came from

    ReplyDelete
  20. Nancy doesn't know me. The victim & her mother were tried & found guilty. The boy had alcohol, but no one is talking about that. They are only talking about the victim.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Good job Byron you just proved Nancy's point.

    Daisy had alcohol before leaving the house in front of mom but nobody wants to talk about that either.

    You just got bitch slapped.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Oh Nancy, please I don't think you're a bitch. I hope you understand what I meant there.

    ReplyDelete
  23. 11:15: Wading through your overwrought post is a challenge, but if I understand what you're saying, you ask "where (sic) were this girls (sic) rights to not be raped?" when (sic) she was intoxicated with alcohol given to her by older people and what about the other girl that was also raped ...?"

    This is certainly a good question or questions as the case may be, but was she "given" alcohol or did she take it? Did someone force her to get blackout drunk? Doesn't a person--even someone 13 years old--bear some responsibility for his or her own choices? I agree with Carl. People who know more details about this particular case than we do have ruled.

    ReplyDelete
  24. And Byron, yes the boy did have alcohol, but he seems not to have gotten blackout drunk. Remember Daisy was so out of it she wasn't even able to get inside her house. If she and her mother have been tried and found guilty, it's of being amazingly stupid. Carl's right. Why wasn't grizzly mom charged with at least negligence? Was she any less guilty of child endangerment than the alleged rapist?

    ReplyDelete
  25. Sometimes when I see the things that Byron says I think the surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe is that none of it has tried to contact us.

    ReplyDelete
  26. My brother is an idiot deal with it people

    ReplyDelete
  27. 1:27 We cool, I knew what you meant.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Anon 1:17

    Absurd. I did not get bitch slapped. Nancy is entitled to her opinion just like I am. I don't expect people here to agree with anything I say.

    Daisy was raped. The boy got off because of who his father was. Most of the other comments here are the same old blame the victim.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Anonymous said...
    Tony I am so god damn tired of seeing Byron Funkhouser’s shit on these posts all the time. He is ruining your site. He is not from around here and adds nothing to this local blog. His insight is hateful as a rule and does not reflect the views of people or events of Kansas City. He has gotten to the point he only posts to incite and anger people for his own benefit.

    1/12/14, 12:27 PM

    Tony, I second this comment and many readers agree!!
    Ban Byron the Welfare Thief and Proven Liar!

    ReplyDelete
  30. Rape my ass. Drive over 5 state lines and you get five different versions of what a rape is and five different versions of the age of sexual consent (some being as low as 14). If you were going to force the letter of the law in every case half the cops and prosecutors in this country would be in prison and a writ of man damus would be filled every 10 minutes. If any of these shit house lawyers think they could get a jury to convict on felony rape I'd like to see them pull it off.

    Has anyone ever caught this mother communicating that she or her daughter might have done something wrong the day of this incident? How many times was the girl home drunk? When was the last decade the mother actually checked the girls text messages and cell phone content? Why does the mother blame the boys for leaving her daughter out in the yard when her best friend walked in the house and just left the girl out in the yard? Why was the information on the cell phone deleted? Could it be that there was a history of content that would make the girl look even worse? After all the phone was not in the possession of the alleged offender why would a victim delete it?

    Folks can say what they will about the letter of the law, but I submit that this was no average 14 year old. I would suggest that if this thing had gone to trial this kid would have looked like a Manhattan party girl and her life was already one big mess. How many other 17 year old males had she been with and placed in peril? The prosecutors are not idiots. If they could see that this case sucked to hell and back I doubt there was much chance of pulling the wool over the juries eyes. Just how many tax payer dollars do we need to spend proving this girl was no saint?

    All I see here is a girl who just wants this drama to end and a nutty mother who wants it to never end. How sad.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Carl, Mission Hills1/12/14, 2:38 PM

    2:33 I enjoy your points as well. Nice level thinking and over all look at it.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Ms. 2:29

    For the hundredth time. I am not a "welfare thief" nor am a "proven liar".

    This is a free speech forum & Tony doesn't have the technology to ban anyone, even if he wanted to, which he doesn't.

    Blame the victim continues ...

    Gutless Baker took the easy way out, rather then let a jury decide.

    ReplyDelete
  33. Honestly dude we get it, you have voiced your opinion, multiple times for weeks. She is as innocent as a newborn baby and incapable of a lie.

    Go fuck off now fake funkhouser white knight

    ReplyDelete
  34. Anon 9:33, the very first comment, said it all. Whether she's a saint or not is irrelevant.

    ReplyDelete
  35. 12:27 and 2:29 many agree with your thoughts regarding Byron.


    Byron, listen up idiot. This blog is not about YOU.

    Cool it Byron or you will be history.

    ReplyDelete
  36. Byron doesn't steal welfare!!!!
    He scams the disablity system!
    Get it right!

    ReplyDelete
  37. OMG, I've been threatened by an internet tough guy! LOL.

    More experts in disability law ...

    ReplyDelete
  38. Don't worry Byron. You are tall and have never lost a fight.

    ReplyDelete
  39. The special prosecutor obviously didn't have a solid enough case to go for forcible rape.
    Also, Daisy originally stated that she couldn't remember anything that happened, but later changed her story to say she was raped. Sounds like maybe she changed her story after being pressured by her psycho mom

    ReplyDelete
  40. 2:33- EXACTLY!

    ReplyDelete
  41. you all are guilty of fantasy child porn

    ReplyDelete
  42. "Anon 9:33, the very first comment, said it all. Whether she's a saint or not is irrelevant."

    So why are you still discussing it, Byron?

    ReplyDelete
  43. Byron doesn't exist

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

TKC COMMENT POLICY:

Be percipient, be nice. Don't be a spammer. BE WELL!!!

- The Management