KANSAS VAMPIRE COPS WILL RUN "NO REFUSAL" CHECKPOINTS THIS WEEKEND!!!
Here's a very real and frightening look at the decline of Democracy and Freedom in Kansas.
GET READY FOR A "NO REFUSAL" CHECKPOINT IN KANSAS WHEREIN AUTHORITIES CAN DEMAND BLOOD IF PEOPLE REFUSE TO COOPERATE!!!
Let's get this straight for the cheap seats . . .
NO MATTER THE CIRCUMSTANCES THERE IS NO GOVERNMENT IN THE WORLD THAT HAS THE RIGHT TO DEMAND BLOOD!!!
The fact that this is Kansas political reality reveals that Freedom and or Liberty is quickly vanishing as an American ideal.
There is no defense of this . . . Not for the children, not for safety, not to rid the streets of drunk driving - A state that claims to be pro-life should understand that human blood is sacred and demanding it is nothing less than horrific . . . Taking licenses away is a perfectly reasonable solution to drivers who won't comply with a breath test . . .
Again . . .
AUTHORITIES DEMANDING BLOOD IS NOTHING LESS THAN UNAMERICAN AND SIGN OF THIS NATION IN DECLINE!!!
LINKS
Salina police to pursue 'no refusal' on DUI cases
Officers to pursue blood samples
Salina and Saline County officers to pursue search warrants to get blood for DUI refusals
Posts
27 Comments:
Nice pic.
i smell a lawsuit in the making.
Where;s your tea party anti- gubmint shrieking right wingers now, Kansas?
Shame on Kansas
When you sign for your driver's license you sign consent to a blood draw. You signed your blood hoarding liberties away in order to drive.
These mother-fuckers keep getting reelected, so let the assholes that vote for them hold their arms out and shut the fuck up.
Driving is a privilege, not a right.
wait till they start enforcing the NDAA. Signed by both Rebubs and Dumocrats.
2:47 - this isn't about driving, this is about blood.
Go ahead and take away the driving privileges of drunks. you don't have any right to take blood.
...and we worry about middle east terrorists taking away our freedoms?
I can kind of understand DUI Checkpoints, thought I disagree with them. I do not understand how this is acceptable.
The police act with the approval of the public. Robert Peel, one of the fathers of policing, laid this out in his nine fundamental principals. This is absurdly inappropriate.
It's only new to Kansas.
Part of New World Order, Globalist, UN Agenda 21.
Wait until they take your car and you have to ride the 'toy train' and will live downtown packed in like rats.
Google: UN Agenda 21 and watch the videos...wake up call.
I feel the same way I feel about forced inoculations. You bring your needle, I'll bring my 45. We'll be see who makes the bigger hole.
Good thing this wasn't in effect when Kevin Yoder was pulled over.
How did Congressman Fratboy get out of that?
Agendy 21. Obammy is taking our cars. He already took our guns!!!
New World Order is coming. Toy trains with chains.
The NEW WORLD ORDER is around the corner boys and girls.. Read about it at infowars dot com
DUI checkpoints = search without probable cause.
Read the numbers in the paper. Every time, it's a couple 100 pulled over, and only a couple arrests.
It says refusal to take a breath test, OR blood test.
I think giving the govt. carte blanche to take your blood, through fiat or law is nuts and I am a libertarian conservative.
No blood.
No government foul.
You are a misleading, dishonest person, "Tony".
The officers have to obtain a warrant first...same as they always have! This isn't a case of "get pulled over- automatically give blood". It only applies if you've been drinking and driving, AND you refuse a breath-test. You consented to the breath test when you decided to drive- drunk or sober.
Nothing's changed- just that the police are pursuing their legal options. And if you're driving drunk, in my opinion- you deserve whatever you get.
It has everything to do with driving!
It could easily be 65 out of 100, if everyone was chemically breath checked.
Sixteen other states have similar laws making it a crime to refuse a blood alcohol test.
Starting in July, 2012, the penalty for refusing a breathalyzer will be the same as if you are convicted for a DUI.
The new law is misguided because of the current penalties for refusing the breath test are already extremely severe.
Refuse the breath test in Kansas, already before this new law they would get a one year suspension followed by one year of ignition interlock even on a first offense
Prosecutors point out those who refuse to blow often avoid a conviction and still drive on a suspended license.
They may not have a license but that’s not stopping them from going out and drinking and driving
First time offenders can still refuse the breathalyzer without facing a criminal penalty but the second time you’re pulled over, if you refuse to blow, you’ve basically already convicted yourself of a DUI.
Where is KC Checkpoint?
"Lamer said that as of July 1 a driver who meets certain criteria, such as a previous DUI conviction or a previous refusal of a DUI test, can be charged for refusing a breath or blood test."
A few of these comments come close. Driving isn't a right.
I feel that when you apply the rule of "someone who has been previously convicted of DUI" there shouldn't be any qualms over this. If you've already proven that you are incapable of handling yourself as a safe functioning member of society, then you better damn well prove that you deserve to be behind the wheel of a 2,000+ pound machine that barrels down the road.
And what if you are not drunk, but have a medical condition. I believe there was a story, last year, where some diabetic died in police custody at a traffic stop, like one of those waiting on the medical supena. excuse the spelling. So you folks are willing for more non-drunken drivers to get poked by dirty needles, remember police budgets, by non-medical personal, remember hospital budgets, just to get a supposed drunk driver off the road. Remember they are violating your rights of free travel, of access to your medical supplies, just because they can. And there are medical conditions that appear to the non-medical as drunkenness. Such as diabetes, some medications you may take appear as alchol byproducts in the blood. Some foods such as poppy seed muffins appear in your blood as pot,pcp, and speed.
Remember you can be arrested for those. And now you have to prove you are innocent, not them prove you are guilty. Thats how the laws are now.
James before you show how stupid you are,you best know the law you are bitching about.
The law very clearly states only trained medical staff can draw the blood.
Plus anyone who has a medical condition so severe to cause conditions as possible drunkness they need to have medical alert necklace or braclets on them.
While poppy seeds might show up in a test they sure not going to make you drunk.
Simple solution to the whole issue is don't drink and drive. Then nobody will be sticking you with needles.
And if you live in Kansas you best read the laws very well before you go get your drivers lic renewed because if you don't like them then I suggest you don't get one or at least get off your ass and start a grass roots protest group to ty and change it all. But doubt you will do so.
Life is just plain bizarre. It’s hard enough earning a living and making our way in the world, without failing mandatory drug tests when you haven’t done any drugs to warrant the result. I’m talking about eating poppy seeds and hemp foods. Yes, they can indeed cause you to fail a drug test. This does not happen often, but it does in fact occur from time to time.
Most people who eat poppy seed bagels will not fail opiate tests. And most people who eat hemp foods will not fail marijuana tests. This is due to the incredibly low volume of psychoactive compounds fond in these foods. But occasionally somebody will fail a drug tests when they have done no drugs at all, and this can be due to eating commonly available foods, like a poppy seed bagel or a hemp seed energy bar.
I personally believe that we live in an alarmist time when drug testing is way out of hand. But that is not the issue here. If you eat poppy seeds or hemp snacks, you may possibly fail a drug tests. If this happens, you may lose your job. This is unfair in any case, but you will have to do some fighting to rectify things.
Post a Comment