Monday, May 12, 2008

Kansas City Wastes Energy!!!



We're at the end of the era of cheap oil and what's clear to me is that Kansas City is woefully behind the times when it comes to some of our landmarks and conservation efforts.

In particular, the new(ish) addition to the Nelson-Atkins Museum - The Bloch Building is one of the most egregious examples of backward, wasteful and impractical designs in the Kansas City area. The building is obviously intended to be viewed with the lights on when the sun goes down and the structure is illuminated long after museum hours are over. High ceilings and long, empty corridors not only waste space but also energy to heat and cool. The structure, which looks like one of those prefabricated buildings according to many, seems to have been conceived in a long ago era when fuel was relatively cheap but as of late the building has little in common with the much more recent green movement among more progressive architects.

In fact, the wasteful use of light, space and energy by the Bloch Building is akin to another Kansas City tradition that abuses kilowatt hours in a gross display of consumerism and celebration of a district that was founded on restrictive racial covenants . . . The Plaza Lights.



The target audiences are different but the waste of energy seems the same. Whether it's for art's sake or in order to celebrate the birth of baby Jesus and luxury goods - Leaving the lights on half the night is simply unacceptable when retail energy prices will remain high from now until a time when they invent an anti-gravity machine that runs off good vibes.



Sadly, environmentalists, art lovers and Kansas City cheerleaders ignore one of the most obvious year-round signs of waste because it looks pretty they're afraid to challenge fellow liberals or point out the hypocrisy of seemingly forward thinking art aficionados. But make no mistake, the Bloch Building is not only a disaster because of the pedestrian, prefab design but also because it requires a substantial amount of energy to even look halfway presentable . . . If Kansas City was truly making an effort to go "green" there would be a request to at least turn off the lights in the Bloch Building at closing time rather than several hours later.

Unfortunately, like so many others in Kansas City, the supporters of the Bloch Building like to make a big show of their philanthropy but don't really care when the best interests of people and the planet diverge from keeping up appearances.

Put simply, as long as The Bloch Building remains illuminated after hours . . . Art lovers in this town are killing the planet and the people of Kansas City.

Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Lenses" my arse.
We really got buggered but good in that deal.

5/12/2008 11:07:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Your post shows that you know nothing about the design and energy efficiency of the Bloch Building.

As usual -- blathering on about something you don't understand.

5/12/2008 11:08:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

So keeping the lights on at night is energy efficient?
Maybe those lights are windmill powered?
Methinks that this "energy efficiency" is being touted by a d-bag.

5/12/2008 11:36:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

So keeping the lights on at night is energy efficient?
Maybe those lights are windmill powered?
Methinks that this "energy efficiency" is being touted by a d-bag.

5/12/2008 11:36:00 AM  
Anonymous chet, aquarium enthusiast said...

My tiger barbs are terrorizing the fuck out of my community tank. And now I can't even catch the little bastards and try to restore order.
They are truly the mafia of tropical fish.
The only fish they don't bother is my albino catfish.

5/12/2008 11:39:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I prefer Bleeding-Heart Tetras

5/12/2008 11:53:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Do you know how snack-cakes are made. Talk about killing the planet. Hypocrite.

5/12/2008 11:55:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

And the town's premier enviro architecture firm -- BNIM -- collaborated on this environmentally unsound project (Bloch building).

This is what you can do when money is no object: design an ugly building that wastes energy and is no more attractive at night than the inflatable tennis dome across the street. If you're lucky, the New York Times will run a review that doesn't totally repudiate the monstrosity, and local cheerleaders can heave a sigh of relief.

5/12/2008 12:35:00 PM  
Blogger May said...

On top of all that lots of the Bloch building is completely empty, wasted, space. It's ridiculous.

5/12/2008 02:05:00 PM  
Anonymous DKC said...

Have you noticed that in ALL the reviews praising this piece of architectural doo doo that the building is NEVER pictured in the daytime?

5/12/2008 02:17:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Inside, it has a fricking beautiful staircase ... that goes to the staff's offices, not galleries.

5/12/2008 03:51:00 PM  
Blogger The Steve that everyone likes said...

You know I never thought about all the energy being wasted because the building looks good with the lights on Tony. You make a good point.

5/12/2008 05:23:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

It's almost as much energy as is wasted on this blog.

5/12/2008 09:45:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The building seems to make good use of the available ambient light during the day...perhaps that offsets the otherwise excessive use of energy from dusk till twilight? I have no idea. I haven't seen their energy bill. But then again, neither has Tony.

5/12/2008 09:53:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Turn the lights off when you leave the room. That's pretty basic knowledge.

5/13/2008 12:01:00 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home