Monday, March 26, 2007

"Do I vote for some dude or some chick."

The best analysis I've read of the 4th District race I've read so far. Really, this is more reflective of how people really decide how to vote than anything I've read from pundits AND it's still more articulate than the electronic signal from the computer chip in the back of the head that signals members of local political clubs and PACs on how to vote.

5 Comments:

Anonymous said...

I have not received any negative ads from Gamble. On the other hand Gottstein continues to promote untruths about her opponent in order to win the election. Also, if you have seen her at forums, she cannot answer a question without looking it up in her notebook. Imagine whatching that on channel 2 if she gets elected.

Tony said...

I don't ever want to imagine watching Channel 2, ever.

Anonymous said...

The Gottstein campaign sent out a flier today that intentionally lies about Gamble.

A pathetic lie. It says that Gamble has wasted millions of our dollars when, in fact, not one dollar has been spent, and Gamble isn't even associated with the TIF in question.

This is as bad as campaigning gets. Gottstein should be run out of town.

Anonymous said...

It's bad, but so is John Sharp out in the sixth. He's accused his opponent of being under federal indictment for misspending COMBAT funds. How lame. With everything else going on in the county, that certainly would have made headlines. Then he has the audacity to accuse his opponent of negative campaigning.

Heycameraman said...

Tony, did you just call me articulate? :-)you for forgot to mention that i'm also clean.